Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 311–325 | Cite as

Structure and reaction based evaluation of synthetic accessibility

Original paper

Abstract

De novo design systems provide powerful methods to suggest a set of novel structures with high estimated binding affinity. One deficiency of these methods is that some of the suggested structures could be synthesized only with great difficulty. We devised a scoring method that rapidly evaluates synthetic accessibility of structures based on structural complexity, similarity to available starting materials and assessment of strategic bonds where a structure can be decomposed to obtain simpler fragments. These individual components were combined to an overall score of synthetic accessibility by an additive scheme. The weights of the scoring function components were calculated by linear regression analysis based on accessibility scores derived from medicinal chemists. The calculated values for synthetic accessibility agree with the values proposed by chemists to an extent that compares well with how chemists agree with each other.

Keywords

De novo design Reaction center Similarity search Synthetic accessibility 

References

  1. 1.
    Baber JC, Feher M (2004) Mini-Rev Med Chem 4:681Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barone R, Chanon M (2001) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bertz SH (1981) J Am Chem Sci 103:3599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendrickson JB, Huang P, Toczko AG (1987) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 27:63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boda K, Johnson AP (2006) J Med Chem 49:5869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pförtner M, Sitzmann M, Gasteiger J (eds) (2003) Computer-assisted synthesis design by WODCA. Handbook of chemoinformatics. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 1447–1507Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Molecular Networks GmbH, WODCA Synthesis design by retro-synthetic analysis, http://www.molecular-networks.com/software/wodca/Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson AP, Marshall C, Judson PN (1992) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 32:411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Myatt G (1994) Computer aided estimation of synthetic accessibility. PhD thesis, School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, LeedsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shannon C, Weaver W (1949) Mathematical theory of communications. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gasteiger J, Jochum C (1979) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 19:43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corey E, Cheng X-M (1989) The logic of chemical synthesis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Warren S (1982) Organic synthesis: the disconnection approach. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Willett P (1998) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38:983Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gasteiger J, Ihlenfeldt WD, Fick R, Rose JR (1992) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 32:700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ihlenfeldt WD, Gasteiger J (1994) J Comp Chem 15:793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Molecular Networks GmbH, MOSES C++ software library, http://www.molecular-networks.com/software/moses/Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewell XQ, Judd DB, Watson SP, Hann MM (1998) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38:511CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krisztina Boda
    • 1
  • Thomas Seidel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Johann Gasteiger
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer-Chemie-CentrumUniversität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Angewandte SynthesechemieTechnische Universität WienViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations