Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

, Volume 20, Issue 12, pp 763–771 | Cite as

A marriage made in torsional space: using GALAHAD models to drive pharmacophore multiplet searches

Original Paper

Abstract

Pharmacophore multiplets are useful tools for 3D database searching, with the queries used ordinarily being derived from ensembles of random conformations of active ligands. It seems reasonable to expect that their usefulness can be augmented by instead using queries derived from single ligand conformations obtained from aligned ligands. Comparisons of pharmacophore multiplet searching using random conformations with multiplet searching using single conformations derived from GALAHAD (a genetic algorithm with linear assignment for hypermolecular alignment of datasets) models do indeed show that, while query hypotheses based on random conformations are quite effective, hypotheses based on aligned conformations do a better job of discriminating between active and inactive compounds. In particular, the hypothesis created from a neuraminidase inhibitor model was more similar to half of 18 known actives than all but 0.2% of the compounds in a structurally diverse subset of the World Drug Index. Similarly, a model developed from five angiotensin II antagonists yielded hypotheses that placed 65 known antagonists within the top 0.1–1% of decoy databases. The differences in discriminating power ranged from 2 to 20-fold, depending on the protein target and the type of pharmacophore multiplet used.

Keywords

GALAHAD Molecular alignment Pharmacophore Pharmacophore multiplets Tuplets Virtual screening 

Abbreviations

ATII

Angiotensin II

CHDPA

Chapman and Hall Dictionary of Pharmaceutical Agents

GA

Genetic algorithm

GALAHAD

Genetic automated molecular overlays

ROC

Receiver Operating Characteristic

WDI

World Drug Index

References

  1. 1.
    Mason JS, Good AC, Martin EJ (2001) Curr Pharm Des 7:567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marshall GR (1993) ESCOM, Leiden, pp 80Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin YC (1993) NIDA Res Monogr 1134:84Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tuplets™, SYBYL® and UNITY® are distributed by Tripos Inc., 1699 S. Hanley Rd., St. Louis, MO 63144, USA (http://www.tripos.com)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abrahamian E, Fox PC, Naerum L, Christensen IT, Thogersen H, Clark RDJ (2003) Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    GALAHAD™ is distributed by Tripos Inc., 1699 S. Hanley Rd., St. Louis, MO 63144, USA (http://www.tripos.com)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark RD, Abrahamian E, Strizhev A, Wolohan PRN, Abrams C (2005) In: proceedings of the 230th ACS national meeting. COMP, Washington, DC, Abstract No. 137Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark RD, Abrahamian E, Abrams C, Brandt P, Gustavsson A-L, Homan E, N, Metwally E, Richmond NJ, Strizhev A, M, Wirstam M, Wolohan P GALAHAD: a genetic algorithm with linear assignment for hypermolecular alignment of datasets (in preparation)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richmond NJ, Abrams CA, Wolohan PRN, Abraharnian E, Willett P, Clark RD (2006) J Comput Aided Mol Des (in press)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Steindl T, Langer TJ (2004) Chem Inf Comput Sci 44:1849–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC (1995) J Comput Aided Mol Des 9:532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MDDR is distributed by Prous Scientific (http://www.prous.com)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The WDI is distributed by Thomson. The 2005 edition was used hereGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clark RD (1997) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clark RD, Langton WJ (1998) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38:1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    CONCORD® was developed by Pearlman RS, Rusinko A, Skell JM, Balducci R at the University of Texas, Austin, TX and is available exclusively from Tripos Inc., 1699 S. Hanley Road, St. Louis, MO 63144, USA (http://www.tripos.com)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cottrell SJ, Gillet VJ, Taylor R, Wilton DJ (2004) J Comput Aided Mol Des 18:665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hurst TJ (1994) Chem Inf Comput Sci 34:190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor NR, Cleasby A, Singh O, Skarzynski T, Wonacott AJ, Smith PW, Sollis SL, Howes PD, Cherry PC, Bethell R, Colman P, Varghese J (1998) J Med Chem 41:798CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Informatics Research CenterTripos Inc.St. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations