Why relevant chemical information cannot be exchanged without disclosing structures
Both society and industry are interested in increasing the safety of pharmaceuticals. Potentially dangerous compounds could be filtered out at early stages of R&D by computer prediction of biological activity and ADMET characteristics. Accuracy of such predictions strongly depends on the quality & quantity of information contained in a training set. Suggestion that some relevant chemical information can be added to such training sets without disclosing chemical structures was generated at the recent ACS Symposium. We presented arguments that such safety exchange of relevant chemical information is impossible. Any relevant information about chemical structures can be used for search of either a particular compound itself or its close analogues. Risk of identifying such structures is enough to prevent pharma industry from relevant chemical information exchange.
Kew wordsbiological activity spectra computer prediction PASS relevant chemical information reverse engineering safety exchange structure disclosing
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.http://www.cas.orgGoogle Scholar
- 2.http://www.mdl.com/products/knowledge/crossfire_beilstein/Google Scholar
- 3.http://www.chemfinder.comGoogle Scholar
- 7.Poroikov, V. and Filimonov, D. In Christoph Helma (Ed.), Predictive Toxicology, Taylor & Francis, 2005, pp. 459–478Google Scholar
- 9.Safe exchange of chemical information: can relevant chemical information be exchanged without disclosing chemical structures. Symposium in the framework of 229th␣National Spring ACS Meeting, San Diego, CA (March 13–17, 2005)Google Scholar
- 10.http://www.mdl.comGoogle Scholar
- 12.http://cactus.nci.nih.govGoogle Scholar
- 16.http://www.prestwickchemical.comGoogle Scholar
- 18.Schneier, B. Secrets and Lies: Digital Security in a Networked World. John Wiley & Sons, 2000, p. 432Google Scholar