Advertisement

Negative strain rate sensitivity and the critical nature of type A bands in the Portevin-Le Chatelier effect

  • G. AnanthakrishnaEmail author
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Describing spatio-temporal features of the Portevin-Le Chatelier (PLC) effect is a particularly difficult task as it arises from the interaction of the collective modes that have widely separated time scales. Using a dynamical approach we provide a new interpretation for the two most important features of the PLC effect, namely the negative Strain Rate Sensitivity (SRS) of the flow stress and the critical nature of type A band that is reflected in the power law statistics for stress drops in this region. Within the scope of Ananthakrishna’s model, using the slow manifold approach applicable to multiple time scale dynamical systems, we show that the two stable branches of the negative SRS can be identified with two subset of dislocation mechanisms that have physically appealing meaning. The method also allows us to visualize dislocation configurations corresponding to the different band types. While most dislocations are in the pinned state corresponding to type C and B bands, that for the type A are at the edge of unpinning thus explaining the origin of its critical nature of the propagating band.

Keywords

The Portevin-Le Chatelier effect Negative SRS Band types Relaxation oscillations Chaos Power law Slow manifold Criticality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kubin L.P., Fressengeas C. and Ananthakrishna G. (2002). Collective behaviour of dislocations. In: Nabarro, F.R.N. and Deusbery, M.S. (eds) Dislocations in Solids, vol. 11, pp 101–192. North-Holland, Amsterdam CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ananthakrishna, G.: Statistical and dynamical approaches to collective behavior of dislocations. In: Hirth, J. (ed.) Dislocations in Solids, vol. 13, pp. 81–223. North-Holland (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ananthakrishna G. and Valsakumar M.C. (1982). Repeated yield drop phenomena: a temporal dissipative structure. J. Phys. D 15: L171–L175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rajesh S. and Ananthakrishna G. (2000). Relaxation oscillations and negative strain rate sensitivity in the Portevin-Le Chatelier effect. Phys. Rev. E 61: 3664–3674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ananthakrishna G. and Valsakumar M.C. (1983). Chaotic flow in a model for repeating yielding. Phys. Lett. A 95: 69–72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ananthakrishna G. et al. (1999). Crossover from chaotic to self-organized critical dynamics in jerky flow of single crystals. Phys. Rev. E 60: 5455–5462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bharathi M.S. et al. (2001). Multifractal burst in the spatio-temporal dynamics of jerky flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87: 165508–165511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abarbanel H.D.I. (1996). Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data. Springer-Verlag, New York Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bak, P., Tang, C., Wiesenfeld, K.: Self-organised criticality: an explanation of 1/f noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381–384 (1987); Self-organised criticality. Phys. Rev. A 38, 364–374 (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang S., McCormick P.G. and Estrin Y. (2001). The morphology of Potevin-Le Chatelier bands: finite element simulation for Al-Mg-Si. Acta Mater. 49: 1087–1094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hähner P., Ziegenbein A., Rizzi E. and Neuhäuser H. (2002). Spatiotemporal analysis of Portevin-Le Chatelier deformation bands: theory, simulation, and experiment. Phys. Rev. B 65: 134109 (1–20) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kok S., Bharathi M.S., Beaudoin A.J., Fressengeas C., Ananthakrishna G., Kubin L.P. and Lybyodkin M. (2003). Spatial coupling in jerky flow using polycrystal plasticity. Acta Mater. 51: 3651–3662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bharathi M.S. and Ananthakrishna G. (2002). Chaotic and power law states in the Portevin-Le Chatelier effect. Europhys. Lett. 60: 234–240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ananthakrishna G. and Bharathi M.S. (2004). A dynamical approach to the spatiotemporal aspects of the Portevin-Le Chatelier effect: chaos, turbulence and band propagation. Phys. Rev. E 70: 026111 (1–15) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bekele M. and Ananthakrishna G. (1997). High order amplitude equation for steps on creep curve. Phys. Rev. E 56: 6917–6928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Milik A. et al. (1998). Geometry of mixed-mode oscillations in the 3-d autocatalator. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 8: 505–519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajesh S. and Ananthakrishna G. (2000). Incomplete approach to homoclinity in a model with bent-slow manifold geometry. Physica D 140: 193–212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials Research Centre and Centre for Condensed Matter TheoryIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations