Bio-economic modeling of fishing activities in Kenya: the case of Lake Naivasha Ramsar site
Lake Naivasha fishery has been one of the most known sources of protein for most fringe communities in and around Naivasha. About 4000 livelihoods depend on the lake’s fishery resource, both directly and indirectly, thus pose concerns on the future sustainability. The ultimate aim of this study was to explore efforts, costs and optimum levels of fishery exploitation in Lake Naivasha. The study relied on fish landings and fishing effort statistics recorded between 1980 and 2017 by Fisheries Department. Data was analyzed using Gordon Schaefer’s model and excel operating software. A regression model was run to develop graphs that explained the relationship between total costs, total revenues, harvests and number of boats. Consequently to the main aim, the study sought to determine the total costs of fishing along with revenues generated. Findings show an increase in number of operational boats from twenty-six (26) in 1980 to fifty boats (50) in 2013. Thereafter, fishing boats increased significantly to one hundred and seventy-six (176) by 2017. Such a significant and unprecedented increase in efforts adversely affected natural fish stock and brooders of the major fish species in the fishery. Information in this paper will inform decisions on resource economics and management of fishing activities in Lake Naivasha, Kenya.
KeywordsBio-economic modeling Maximum sustainable yield Maximum economic yield Total cost (TC) Effort (E) Harvest (H) Catch per unit effort (CPUE) Poverty Lake Naivasha
We are highly indebted to the Fisheries Department and Staff of Kenya’s Marine and Fisheries Research Institute who provided relevant data and information used in this paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest or whatsoever.
- Anjana, M. (2007). Eco-biology and fisheries of Whelk, Babylonia Spirata (Linnaeus, 1758) and Babylonia Zeylanica (Bruguiere, 1789) along Kerala Coast, India. Doctoral thesis, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute. Retrieved from http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/10774/.
- Armstrong, C. W., Eide, A., Flaaten, O., Heen, K., & Kaspersen, I. W. (2014). Rebuilding the northeast arctic cod fisheries—Economic and social issues. Arctic Review on Law and Politics,5, 11–37.Google Scholar
- Bayliff, W. H. (2001). Status of blue fin tuna in the Pacific Ocean. IATTC Stock Assessment Report 1, La Jolla California, USA. Retrieved from https://www.iattc.org/PDFFiles/SpecialReports/_English/No-13-2001-BAYLIFF,%20WILLIAM%20H_Organization,%20functions,%20and%20achievements%20of%20the%20Inter-American%20Tropical%20Tuna%20Commission.pdf.
- Flaaten, O. (2011). Fisheries Economics and Management. N-9037 (1st ed.). Tromso, Norway: Norwegian College of Fishery Science. http://www.ub.uit.no/munin/bitstream/handle/10037/2509/book.pdf?sequence=1%0AISBN.
- Milner, S. B. (1954). Research efforts of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission and its primary purpose. Pan American Fisherman, 8(8), 2–33.Google Scholar
- Mohsin, M., Mu, Y. T., Noman, M., Hengbin, Y., & Mehak, A. (2018). Estimation of maximum sustainable harvest levels and bioeconomic implications of Babylonia spirata fisheries in Pakistan by using CEDA and ASPIC. Oceanography & Fisheries,7(3), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Njiru, J., Waithaka, E., Mugo, J., & Morara, G. (2015). Fish kills in lake Naivasha, Kenya: What was the probable cause? International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies,3(1), 179–184.Google Scholar
- Palm, W. J. (1975). Fishery regulation via optimal control theory. Fishery Bulletin,73(4), 830–837.Google Scholar
- Press, C. (2010). The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery author(s): H. Scott Gordon Source: The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 62, No. 2 (Apr., 1954): pp. 124–142. Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable.Google Scholar
- Sønvisen, S. A., Johnsen, J. P., & Vik, J. (2011). The norwegian coastal employment system: What it was and what it is. Maritime Studies, 10(1), 31–56.Google Scholar
- South, F. O. R., Rflp, S. A., & Joseph, L. (2013). Facilitating co-management in small-scale fisheries: Processes and experiences of the Regional Fisheries Livelihoods Programme in Sri Lanka. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
- Squires, D., & Vestergaard, N. (2009). Technical change and the commons (pp. 1–79). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Waithaka, E., Boera, P., Morara, G., Nzioka, A., Mutie, A., & Keyombe, J. L. (2019). Trends in fishing on Lake Naivasha and their implications for management. African Journal of Tropical Hydrobiology and Fisheries,15, 9–15.Google Scholar
- Yongo, E. O., Morara, G., Ojuok, J., Nyamweya, C., & Ojwang, W. (2013). Socio-economic aspects of fisheries management in Lake Naivasha. African Journal of Tropical Hydrobiology and Fisheries,13, 27–32.Google Scholar