Journal of Bioeconomics

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 159–163 | Cite as

Domestication experiments reveal developmental link between friendliness and cognition

Article

Abstract

The goal of economics is to understand human preferences. Most research focuses on adult humans and does not take an evolutionary approach. In biology experimental evolution has been able to shift the preferences of animals. As an example, artificial selection for friendly behavior toward humans results in a syndrome of changes that strongly resembles differences between wild and domestic animals. These domestication experiments have revealed precise genetic and neurobiological systems that are altered by the selection and linked through expanded windows of development. Similar evolutionary experiments selecting for a range of social, risk or discounting preferences could push economics toward consilience with biology. Prospects for a unified theory of economic behavior would be drastically improved.

Keywords

Domestication Artificial selection Prosociality Social preferences Decision making Self domestication 

References

  1. Albert, F. W., Shchepina, O., Winter, C., Römpler, H., Teupser, D., Palme, R., Ceglarek, U., Kratzsch, J., Sohr, R., & Trut, L. N. (2008). Phenotypic differences in behavior, physiology and neurochemistry between rats selected for tameness and for defensive aggression towards humans. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 413–421.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, F. W., Somel, M., Carneiro, M., Aximu-Petri, A., Halbwax, M., Thalmann, O., Blanco-Aguiar, J. A., Plyusnina, I. Z., Trut, L., Villafuerte, R., Ferrand, N., Kaiser, S., Jensen, P., & Paabo, S. (2012). A comparison of brain gene expression levels in domesticated and wild animals. PLoS Genet, 8, e1002962.Google Scholar
  3. Belyaev, D., Plyusnina, I., & Trut, L. (1985). Domestication in the silver fox (Vulpes Fulvus Desm): Changes in physiological boundaries of the sensitive period of primary socialization. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 13, 359–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Browne, J. (2011). Charles Darwin: The power of place. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  5. Burnham, T. (2017). She who understands the fruit fly would do more for economics than Adam Smith: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Bioeconomics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-017-9268-5.
  6. Carre, J. M., McCormick, C. M., & Hariri, A. R. (2011). The social neuroendocrinology of human aggression. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 935–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cieri, R. L., Churchill, S. E., Franciscus, R. G., Tan, J., & Hare, B. (2014). Craniofacial feminization, social tolerance, and the origins of behavioral modernity. Current Anthropology, 55, 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin, C. (1868). The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: O. Judd.Google Scholar
  10. Gariépy, J.-L., Bauer, D. J., & Cairns, R. B. (2001). Selective breeding for differential aggression in mice provides evidence for heterochrony in social behaviours. Animal Behaviour, 61, 933–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gogoleva, S., Volodin, J., Volodina, E., & Trut, L. (2008). To bark or not to bark: vocalizations by red foxes selected for tameness or aggressiveness toward humans. Bioacoustics, 18, 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hare, B. (2017). Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 155–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N., Schepina, O., Stepika, A., Wrangham, R., & Trut, L. (2005). Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology, 15, 226–230.Google Scholar
  14. Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2005a). The emotional reactivity hypothesis and cognitive evolution: Reply to Miklósi and Topál. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 464–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2005b). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hare, B., Wobber, V., & Wrangham, R. (2012). The self-domestication hypothesis: Evolution of bonobo psychology is due to selection against aggression. Animal Behaviour, 83, 573–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hare, B., & Woods, V. (2013). The genius of dogs: Discovering the unique intelligence of man’s best friend. London: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Hernádi, A., Kis, A., Turcsán, B., & Topál, J. (2012). Man’s underground best friend: Domestic ferrets, unlike the wild forms, show evidence of dog-like social-cognitive skills. PLoS ONE, 7, e43267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kagawa, H., Suzuki, K., Takahasi, M., & Okanoya, K. (2014). Domestication changes innate constraints for birdsong learning. Behavioural Processes, 106, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: Evidence for “fast mapping”. Science, 304, 1682–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maclean, E. L., Matthews, L. J., Hare, B. A., Nunn, C. L., Anderson, R. C., Aureli, F., Brannon, E. M., Call, J., Drea, C. M., & Emery, N. J. (2012). How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology. Animal Cognition, 15, 223–238.Google Scholar
  22. Montoya, E. R., Terburg, D., Bos, P. A., & van Honk, J. (2012). Testosterone, cortisol, and serotonin as key regulators of social aggression: A review and theoretical perspective. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Plyusnina, I., Oskina, I., & Trut, L. (1991). An analysis of fear and aggression during early development of behaviour in silver foxes (Vulpes vulpes). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 32, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sánchez-Villagra, M. R., Geiger, M., & Schneider, R. A. (2016). The taming of the neural crest: A developmental perspective on the origins of morphological covariation in domesticated mammals. Royal Society Open Science, 3, 160107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, B. P., & Litchfield, C. A. (2010). Dingoes (Canis dingo) can use human social cues to locate hidden food. Animal Cognition, 13, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Theofanopoulou, C., Gastaldon, S., O’Rourke, T., Samuels, B. D., Messner, A., Martins, P. T., Delogu, F., Alamri, S. & Boeckx, C. (2017). Comparative genomic evidence for self-domestication in Homo sapiens. bioRxiv, 125799.Google Scholar
  27. Trut, L. (1999). Early Canid Domestication: The Farm-Fox Experiment Foxes bred for tamability in a 40-year experiment exhibit remarkable transformations that suggest an interplay between behavioral genetics and development. American Scientist, 87, 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trut, L., Oskina, I., & Kharlamova, A. (2009). Animal evolution during domestication: The domesticated fox as a model. Bioessays, 31, 349–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilkins, A. S., Wrangham, R. W., & Fitch, W. T. (2014). The “domestication syndrome” in mammals: A unified explanation based on neural crest cell behavior and genetics. Genetics, 197, 795–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wobber, V., & Hare, B. (2009). Testing the social dog hypothesis: Are dogs also more skilled than chimpanzees in non-communicative social tasks? Behavioural Processes, 81, 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wobber, V., Hare, B., Koler-Matznick, J., Wrangham, R., & Tomasello, M. (2009). Breed differences in domestic dogs’(Canis familiaris) comprehension of human communicative signals. Interaction Studies, 10, 206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Duke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations