Journal of Bioeconomics

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 217–242

When doing nothing is something. How task allocation strategies compromise between flexibility, efficiency, and inactive agents


DOI: 10.1007/s10818-015-9205-4

Cite this article as:
Charbonneau, D. & Dornhaus, A. J Bioecon (2015) 17: 217. doi:10.1007/s10818-015-9205-4


We expect that human organizations and cooperative animal groups should be optimized for collective performance. This often involves the allocation of different individuals to different tasks. Social insect colonies are a prime example of cooperative animal groups that display sophisticated mechanisms of task allocation. Here we discuss which task allocation strategies may be adapted to which environmental and social conditions. Effective and robust task allocation is a hard problem, and in many biological and engineered complex systems is solved in a decentralized manner: human organizations may benefit from insights into what makes decentralized strategies of group organization effective. In addition, we often find considerable variation among individuals in how much work they appear to contribute, despite the fact that individual selfishness in social insects is low and optimization occurs largely at the group level. We review possible explanations for uneven workloads among workers, including limitations on individual information collection or constraints of task allocation efficiency, such as when there is a mismatch between the frequency of fluctuations in demand for work and the speed at which workers can be reallocated. These processes are likely to apply to any system in which worker agents are allocated to tasks with fluctuating demand, and should therefore be instructive to understanding optimal task allocation and inactive workers in any distributed system. Some of these processes imply that a certain proportion of inactive workers can be an adaptive strategy for collective organization.


Task allocation Inactivity Organization of work Decentralized complex systems Social insects Resource allocation 

Funding information

Funder NameGrant NumberFunding Note
Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (US)
  • 1045239
Division of Environmental Biology (US)
  • 1262292
Division of Integrative Organismal Systems (US)
  • 1455983

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations