Advertisement

Journal of Bioeconomics

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 17–40 | Cite as

Guanxi: Personal connections in Chinese society

  • Bingyuan HsiungEmail author
Article

Abstract

Guanxi is known to be an important feature of Chinese society, and while studies of the subject are voluminous, the present study attempts to explore two critical aspects that tend to be neglected. First, previous studies have mostly dealt with guanxi in business activities, but we analyze the meanings of guanxi in the context of ordinary people. More importantly, even though guanxi has routinely been attributed to Confucianism, it begs the more fundamental question of why Chinese society has developed Confucianism and why the latter has become the dominant ideology over the centuries. We provide a plausible account of this important question from both sociological and economic perspectives. Secondly, we illustrate the general implications of guanxi in Chinese society, in particular relating guanxi to the development of democracy and of the rule of law. Consequently, its significance in Chinese society is actually more important than what has been suggested in the literature. Finally, we present some preliminary empirical evidence, based on survey results, of the importance of guanxi in contemporary Chinese society.

Keywords

Guanxi Tools Familial relations-guanxi nexus Five cardinal virtues 

JEL Classification

O53 O29 P49 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alon I. (2003) Chinese culture, organizational behavior, and international business management. Praeger, Westport, CTGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedict R. (1946) The Chrysanthem and the sword. Riverside Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Carniero R.L. (1970) A theory of the origin of the state. Science 169: 733–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chung W.K., Hamilton G.G. (2001) Social logic as business logic: Guanxi, trustworthiness, and the embeddedness of Chinese business practices. In: Applebaum R.P., Felstiner W.L.F., Gessner V. (eds.) Rules and networks: The legal culture of global business transactions. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 325–346Google Scholar
  5. Coase R.H. (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coase, R.H. (1990). The firm, the market and the law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coleman J.S. (1990) Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Davies H., Leung T.K.P., Luk S.T.K., Wong Y.H. (1995) The benefits of ‘guanxi’—the value of relationships in developing the Chinese market. Industrial Marketing Management 24: 207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies H., Leung T.K.P., Luk S.T.K., Wong Y.H. (2003) Guanxi and business practices in the People’s Republic of China. In: Alon I. (ed.) Chinese culture, organizational behavior, and international business management. Praeger, Westport, CT, pp 41–56Google Scholar
  10. Fan Y. (2002) Questioning guanxi: Definition, classification and implications. International Business Review 11(5): 543–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farh J.L., Earley P.C., Lin S.C. (1997) Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3): 421–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fei, X.T. (1948/1992). From the soil, the foundations of Chinese society. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Translated by G. Hamilton & Z. Wang. Xiangtu Zhongguo. Shanghai: Observer).Google Scholar
  13. Gold, T., Guthrie, D., Wank, D. (eds.) (2002) Social connections in China. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Grainger S. (2003) Organizational guanxi in China’s hotel sector. In: Alon I. (ed.) Chinese culture, organizational behavior, and international business management. Praeger, Westport, CT, pp 57–72Google Scholar
  15. Granovetter M.S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Granovetter M.S. (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory 1: 201–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Granovetter M.S. (1985) Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Granovetter M.S. (2005) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(1): 33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guthrie D. (1998) The declining significance of guanxi in China’s economic transition. The China Quarterly 154: 254–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsiao R.L. (2003) Technology fears: Distrust and cultural persistence in electronic marketplace adoption. Strategic Information Systems 12: 169–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsiung B.Y. (2001) A methodological comparison of Ronald Coase and Gary Becker. American Law and Economics Review 3(1): 186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang K.K. (1987) Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology 92(4): 945–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hwang K.K. (1999) Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2: 163–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hwang K.K. (2000) Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 30(2): 155–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hwang K.K. (2003) In search of a new paradigm for cultural psychology. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 6: 287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hwang K.K. (2005) A philosophical reflection on the epistemology and methodology of indigenous psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 8(1): 5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Khan, M.H., Jomo, K.S. (eds.) (2000) Rents, rent-seeking and economic development: Theory and evidence in Asia. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. King A.Y.C. (1991) Kuan-hsi and network building: A sociological interpretation. Daedalus 120(2): 63–84Google Scholar
  29. Kuran T. (2004) The economic ascent of the Middle East’s religious minorities: The role of Islamic legal pluralism. Journal of Legal Studies 33: 475–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Landa, J.T. (1981). A theory of the ethnically homogeneous middleman group: An institutional alternative contract law. Journal of Legal Studies, 10, 349–362. (Collected in Landa, J.T. (1994). Trust, ethnicity, and identity: Beyond the new institutional economics of ethnic trading networks, contact law, and gift-exchange (pp. 101–114). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar
  31. Landa J.T. (1998) The co-evolution of markets, entrepreneurship, laws, and institutions in China’s economy in transition: A new institutional economics perspective. University of British Columbia Law Review 32(2): 391–421Google Scholar
  32. Landa J.T. (2001) Coasean foundations of a unified theory of Western and Chinese contractual practices and economic organizations. In: Appelbaum R.P., Felstiner W.L.F., Gressner V. (eds.) Rules and networks: The legal culture of global business transactions. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 347–362Google Scholar
  33. Landes D.S. (1998) The wealth and poverty of nations: Why are some so rich and others so poor?. W.W. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee R.E. (2003) It doesn’t matter: ‘Mei guanxi,’ cultural difference, and business opportunity in the People’s Republic of China. In: Alon I. (ed.) Chinese culture, organizational behavior, and international business management. Praeger, Westport, CT, pp 73–84Google Scholar
  35. Li S. (2004) From relations to rules: A theoretical explanation and empirical evidence. In: Chaihark H., Bell D.A. (eds.) The politics of affective relations: East Asia and beyond. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, pp 217–230Google Scholar
  36. Lin N. (2001) Guanxi: A conceptual analysis. In: So A.Y., Lin N., Poston D. (eds.) The Chinese triangle of mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: Comparative institutional analysis. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, CT, pp 153–166Google Scholar
  37. Luo Y. (1997) Guanxi: Principles, philosophies, and implications. Human Systems Management 16(1): 43–51Google Scholar
  38. Nathan A.J. (1993) Is Chinese culture distinctive?—a review article. Journal of Asian Studies 52(4): 923–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. North D.C. (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Olson M. (1993) Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review 87(3): 567–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peerenboom R. (2006) Democracy, rule of law and administrative law reform in China. In: Zhao S.S. (ed.) Debating political reform in China: Rule of law vs democratization. M. E. Sharpe, New York, pp 58–78Google Scholar
  42. Posner R. (2003) Law, pragmatism, and democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  43. Potter P.B. (2002) Guanxi and the PRC legal system: From contradiction to complementarity. In: Gold T., Guthrie D., Wank D. (eds.) Social connections in China. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Putnam R.D., Leonardi R., Nanetti R.Y. (1993) Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  45. Ramseyer M.J. (1997) Odd markets in Japanese history: Law and economic growth. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun, C. (1984). Toward a rich and courteous society. Taipei: Commonwealth Publishing (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  47. Tollison, R.D., Congleton, R.D. (eds.) (1995) The economic analysis of rent seeking. Edward Elgar, Brookfield, VMGoogle Scholar
  48. Xin K.R., Pearce J.L. (1996) Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal 39(6): 1641–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yeung I.Y.M., Tung R.L. (1996) Achieving business success in confucian societies: The importance of guanxi. Organizational Dynamics 25(2): 54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business ManagementChina University of TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Zhejiang UniversityZhejiangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations