Journal of Bioeconomics

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 257–266 | Cite as

Regional culture and adaptive behavior of physicians

Open Access
Article

Abstract

We examine the possibility that regional differentiation of occupations may shed light on how professional behavior adapts to environmental change. Based on the relative prevalence of occupational categories, we defined five geographic regions within the 48 contiguous United States. 77 psychometric, demographic and cultural metrics that covaried significantly with geographic regions by ANOVA were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA), from which three primary clusters emerged. A panel of judges scored the occupations in these clusters for three primary characteristics: generation of variance (Va), reconciliation of variance with institutional procedures (Re) or implementation of standard institutional practice (Pr). By plotting composites of the clustered elements in a 3-dimensional (Va, Re, Pr) matrix, substantially overlapping regional composites emerged for psychological, cultural and occupational metrics. Based on this putative psychological and cultural differentiation of geographic regions, we asked whether adaptive change in physician—and, by extension, of other professional—behavior might be more strongly correlated with intrinsic (e.g. psychological) or extrinsic (e.g. cultural) factors. Based on significant regional differences in patient behavior and minimal regional differences in physician psychology, we suggest that extrinsic factors may play a more direct role in changing professional behavior than intrinsic factors.

Keywords

Physician Adaptive behavior Regional culture Evolution of occupations Socioeconomic evolution 

JEL Classification

O18 

Supplementary material

10818_2011_9115_MOESM1_ESM.xls (44 kb)
ESM 1 (XLS 44 kb)

References

  1. Boschma R. A., Frenken K. (2006) Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography. Journal of Economic Geography 6: 273–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eagle N., Macy M., Claxton R. (2010) Network diversity and economic development. Science 328: 1029–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hogg R. V., Ledolter J. (1987) Engineering statistics. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Marengo L., Dosi G. (2005) Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 58(2): 303–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mascarenhas D., Singh B. K., Singh A. H., Veer S. V. (2007) Early adoption of new drug treatments: The role of continuing medical education and physician adaptivity. Critical Pathways in Cardiology 6: 30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Simmie J., Martin R. (2010) The economic resilience of regions: Towards an evolutionary approach. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3: 27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sokal R. R., Rohlf F. J. (1962) The comparison of dendrograms by objective methods. Taxon 11: 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Storper M., Scott A. J. (2009) Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography 9: 147–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mayflower Organization for Research and EducationSunnyvaleUSA
  2. 2.Computational and Life Sciences InitiativeEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations