Journal of Bioeconomics

, 10:23 | Cite as

Accounting for economic evolution: Fitness and the population method

Article

Abstract

The theme of this paper is the general population dynamics of evolutionary processes, and, in particular, a number of accounting concepts that are central to any understanding of evolutionary processes of the variation-cum-selection retention kind. A population perspective, for example, turns out to be crucial to the study of the competitive process in economic systems defined at the level of industries, sectors and markets. Business rivalry, underpinned by differential innovative activity, is the basis of the differential survival and growth of competing economic activities and the strategies deployed to create sustainable differences in competitive selection characteristics are at the core of the capitalist dynamic interpreted as an adaptive, evolutionary process. This kind of evolutionary argument is necessarily concerned with growth rate dynamics and the explanation of the diversity of growth rates across entities in a population. However, the following discussion does not provide any causal explanation of economic evolution in terms of the determinants of growth rate differences, rather it provides a bookkeeping scheme in which different causal theories may be set and compared. Growth dynamics and structural change are the two central features of variation/selection processes within populations and I explore them in terms of three themes: namely, Logistic Growth Accounting; Competition Accounting; and, the Price Theorem. The unifying theme that links all three is their relation to the population method in evolutionary theory.

Keywords

Economic evolution Economic fitness Fisher-Price accounting 

JEL Classification

C00 L10 O10 O40 

References

  1. Alchian A.A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 58: 211–221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, E. S. (2004). Evolutionary econometrics: From Joseph Schumpeter’s failed econometrics to George Price’s general evometrics and beyond. Mimeo. DRUID, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  3. Ariew A. and Lewontin R.C. (2004). The confusions of fitness. British Journal of Philosophy 55: 347–363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey, M. N., Hulten, C., & Campbell, D. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing plants. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics 2.Google Scholar
  5. Bartelsman E.J. and Doms M. (2000). Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal micro datasets. Journal of Economic Literature 38: 569–594 Google Scholar
  6. Bouchard F. and Rosenberg A. (2004). Fitness, probability and the principles of natural selection. British Journal of Philosophy 55: 693–712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandon R.N. (1991). Adaptation and environment. Princeton University Press, New Jersey Google Scholar
  8. Carlin W., Haskel J. and Seabright P. (2001). Understanding ‘the essential fact about capitalism’: Markets, competition and creative destruction. National Institute Economic Review 175: 67–84 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen N.D., Burkhart R., Dosi G., Egidi M., Marengo L., Warglien E. and Winter S.G. (1996). Routines and other recurring action patterns of organizations: Contemporary research issues. Industrial and Corporate Change 5: 653–699 Google Scholar
  10. Dawkins R. (1986). The blind watchmaker: Why the evidence of evolution reveals a universe without design. Norton, New York Google Scholar
  11. Dopfer K., Potts J. and Foster J. (2004). Micro-meso-macro. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14: 263–280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dosi G. (2000). Innovation, organization and economic dynamics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Google Scholar
  13. Downie J. (1958). The competitive process. Duckworth, London Google Scholar
  14. Fisher R.A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. The Clarendon Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  15. Fisher J. and Pry R. (1971). A simple substitution model of technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 3: 75–88 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Foss N. and Knudsen C. (1996). Towards a competence theory of the firm. Routledge, London Google Scholar
  17. Foster J. and Metcalfe J.S. (2001). Frontiers of evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Google Scholar
  18. Frank S.A. (1998). Foundations of social evolution. Princeton University Press, New Jersey Google Scholar
  19. Gintis H. (2002). Game theory evolving. Princeton University Press, New Jersey Google Scholar
  20. Godfrey-Smith P. (2000). The replicator in retrospect. Biology and Philosophy 15: 403–423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gould S.J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Belknap Press, Harvard Google Scholar
  22. Harms W. (1996). Cultural evolution and the variable phenotypes. Biology and Philosophy 11: 357–375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hodgson G.M. and Knudsen T. (2004). The firm as an interactor: Firms as vehicles for habits and routines. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14: 281–308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hodgson, G. M., & Knudsen, T. (2004b). The limits of Lamarkism revisited. Mimeo. University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield.Google Scholar
  25. Horan B.L. (1995). The statistical character of evolutionary theory. Philosophy of Science 61: 76–95 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hull D.L. (1988). Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
  27. Knudsen T. (2004). General selection theory and economic evolution: The price equation and the replicator/interactor distinction. Journal of Economic Methodology 11: 147–173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Knudsen, T. & Hodgson, G. M. (2004). The nature and units of social selection. Paper presented at the workshop: Evolutionary concepts in economics and biology, Jena, December 2005.Google Scholar
  29. Landes D. (1998). The wealth and poverty of nations. Little Brown and Co., London Google Scholar
  30. Laurent J. and Nightingale J. (2001). Darwinism and evolutionary economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Google Scholar
  31. Lewontin R.C. (1974). The genetic basis of evolutionary change. Columbia University Press, New York Google Scholar
  32. Loasby B. (1991). Equilibrium and evolution: An exploration of connecting principles in economics. Manchester University Press, Manchester Google Scholar
  33. Lovas B. and Ghoshal S. (2000). Strategy as guided evolution. Strategic Management Journal 21: 875–896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marshall A. (1920). Principles of economics. Macmillan, London Google Scholar
  35. Matthen M. and Ariew A. (2002). Two ways of thinking about fitness and natural selection. Journal of Philosophy 99(2): 55–83 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matthen M. and Ariew A. (2005). How to understand causal relations in natural selection: Reply to Rosenberg and Bouchard. Biology and Philosophy 20: 355–364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayr, E. (1959). Typological versus population thinking. Reprinted in Mayr, E. (1976). Evolution and the diversity of life: Selected essays. Harvard: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  38. Metcalfe J.S. (1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. Routledge, London Google Scholar
  39. Metcalfe J.S. (2001). Institutions and progress. Industrial and Corporate Change 10(3): 561–586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metcalfe J.S. (2006). Entrepreneurship: An evolutionary perspective. In: Casson, M., Yeung, B. and Wadeson, N. (eds) The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurship, pp 59–90. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  41. Metcalfe J.S. and Ramlogan R. (2005). Limits to the economy of knowledge and knowledge of the economy. Futures 37: 655–674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Metcalfe, J. S., & Ramlogan, R. (2006). Creative destruction and the measurement of productivity change. Revue de l’OFCE, June, pp 373–397.Google Scholar
  43. Michod R.E. (1999). Darwinian dynamics. Princeton University Press, New Jersey Google Scholar
  44. Mokyr J. (1990). The lever of riches. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  45. Mokyr J. (2002). The gifts of Athena. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  46. Montgomery, C. (eds) (1995). Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Google Scholar
  47. Nanay B. (2002). The return of the replicator: What is philosophically significant in a general account of replication and selection. Biology and Philosophy 17: 109–121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nelson R. and Winter S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press, Harvard Google Scholar
  49. Nelson R. and Winter S.G. (2002). Evolutionary theorising in economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16: 23–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nightingale J. (1998). Jack Downie’s ‘competitive process: The first articulated population model in economics’. History of Political Economy 30: 369–408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Okashi S. (2004a). Multi-level selection and the partitioning of covariance: A comparison of three approaches. Evolution 58(3): 486–494 Google Scholar
  52. Okashi S. (2004b). Multi-level selection, covariance and contextual analysis. British Journal of Philosophy 55: 481–504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Page K.M. and Nowack M.A. (2002). Unifying evolutionary dynamics. Journal of Theoretical Biology 219: 93–98 Google Scholar
  54. Price G.R. (1970). Selection and covariance. Nature 227: 520–521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sober E. (1984). The nature of selection. MIT Press, Boston Google Scholar
  56. Sober E. and Wilson D.S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA Google Scholar
  57. Sterelny K., Smith K.C. and Dickison M. (1996). The extended replicator. Biology and Philosophy 11: 377–403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tuomi J. (1992). Evolutionary synthesis: A search for the strategy. Philosophy of Science 59: 429–438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vrba E.S. and Gould S.J. (1986). The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: Sorting and selection cannot be equated. Paleobiology 12: 217–228 Google Scholar
  60. Walsh D.M. (2003). Fit and diversity: Explaining adaptive evolution. Philosophy of Science 70: 280–301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Winter S.G. (1963). Economic “natural selection” and the theory of the firm. Yale Economic Essays 4(1): 225–272 Google Scholar
  62. Witt U. (2003). The evolving economy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Institute of Innovation ResearchThe University of ManchesterManchesterEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations