Journal of Bioeconomics

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 145–167 | Cite as

Neuroeconomics as a Natural Extension of Bioeconomics: The Shifting Scope of Standard Economic Theory

Open Access
Article

Synopsis

Neuroeconomics rightly has been claimed to be a natural extension of bioeconomics. One of the things bioeconomics investigates is what behavioral dispositions and what behavioral patterns evolutionary processes have produced. Neuroeconomics extends this to the study of evolved mechanisms that are at work in decision-making at the neural level of the brain. The paper argues that in another respect neuroeconomics and bioeconomics are discontinuous, however. Bioeconomics maintains that the applicability of standard economic theory’s constrained maximization framework is not confined to human behavior. The constrained maximization framework is believed to be suitable to describe behavior throughout the animal kingdom. By contrast, despite some minor internal disagreements all neuroeconomists seem to agree that human behavior is predicted poorly by standard economic theory in several social and economic situations. Neuroscience is believed to hold out the hope of an advanced understanding of when and why this is the case.

Keywords

Constrained maximization Evolutionary biology Natural selection Neuroscience 

JEL Classification

A12 B25 B52 

References cited

  1. Becker, Gary S. 1976. Altruism, egoism, and genetic fitness: economics and sociobiology. Journal of Economic Literature: 817–826.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett Max R., Peter M. S. Hacker (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Berns Gregory S. (2003). Neural game theory and the search for rational agents in the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26(2): 155–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camerer, Colin F. 2003a. Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton University Press (Russell Sage Foundation), Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  5. Camerer Colin F. (2003b). Strategizing in the brain. Science 300: 1673–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camerer, Colin F. 2005. Neuroeconomics: what is neuroeconomics? (Found on: http://www.hss.caltech. edu/∼camerer/web_material/n.html. Consulted May 2005).Google Scholar
  7. Camerer Colin F., George Loewenstein, Drazen Prelec (2004). Neuroeconomics: why economics needs brains. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106(3): 555–579.Google Scholar
  8. Camerer Colin F., George Loewenstein, Drazen Prelec (2005). Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature 43(1): 9–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chorvat Terence R., Kevin McCabe (2005). Neuroeconomics and rationality. Chicago-Kent Law Review 80: 101–121Google Scholar
  10. Coase Ronald H. (1976). Adam Smith’s view of man. Journal of Law and Economics 19: 529–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coase, Ronald H. 1978. Comment (on Ghiselin 1978). American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 68: 244–245.Google Scholar
  12. Dawkins, Richard. 1995. God’s utility function. Pp. 111–155 in River out of Eden. Phoenix, London.Google Scholar
  13. Dopfer Kurt (ed). (2005) The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank Robert H. (1988). Passions within reason. W.W. Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Frank Robert H. (2004). What price the moral high ground? Ethical dilemmas in competitive environments. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghiselin Michael T. (1974). The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. Berkeley and Los Angeles. University of California Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghiselin Michael T. (1978). The economy of the body. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 68: 233–237Google Scholar
  18. Gigerenzer Gerd, Peter M. Todd, & ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford.Google Scholar
  19. Glimcher Paul W. (2002). Decisions, decisions, decisions: choosing a biological science of choice. Neuron 36: 323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glimcher Paul W. (2003). Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain: the science of neuroeconomics. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Glimcher Paul W., Aldo Rustichini (2004). Neuroeconomics: the consilience of brain and decision. Science 306: 447–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glimcher, Paul W., Michael C. Dorris & Hannah M. Bayer. 2005. Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice. 52: Games and Economic Behavior 213–256.Google Scholar
  23. Gul, Faruk & Wolfgang Pesendorfer. 2005. The case for mindless economics (Working paper, http://www.dklevine.com/archive/refs4784828000000000581.pdf).Google Scholar
  24. Hirshleifer, Jack. 1977a. Economics from a biological viewpoint. Journal of Law and Economics: 1–52.Google Scholar
  25. Hirshleifer, Jack. 1977b. Shakespeare vs. Becker on altruism: the importance of having the last word. Journal of Economic Literature: 500–502.Google Scholar
  26. Hirshleifer Jack (1978). Competition, cooperation, and conflict in economics and biology. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 68: 238–243Google Scholar
  27. Hodgson Geoffrey M. (1997). The ubiquity of habits and rules. Cambridge Journal of Economics 21(6): 663–684Google Scholar
  28. Hodgson Geoffrey M (1998). The approach of evolutionary economics. Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 166–192Google Scholar
  29. Hodgson Geoffrey M. (2000). Evolution and institutions: on evolutionary economics and the evolution of economics. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  30. Kacelnik, Alex. 2006. Meanings of rationality. Pp 87–106 in S. Hurley & M. Nudds (ed.) Rational Animals? Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Kahneman Daniel (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review 93(5): 1449–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kysar, Douglas A. (Rapporteur). 2006. Group report: are heuristics a problem or a solution? Pp. 103–140 in C. Engel & G. Gigerenzer (ed.) Heuristics and the Law. MIT Press, Cambridge. (Other participants: Peter Ayton, Robert H. Frank, Bruno S. Frey, Gerd Gigerenzer, Paul W. Glimcher, Russell Korobkin, Donald C. Langevoort & Stefan Magen.)Google Scholar
  33. Landa Janet T., Michael T. Ghiselin (1999). The emerging discipline of bioeconomics: aims and scope of the Journal of Bioeconomics. Journal of Bioeconomics 1: 5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Landa Janet T., Xiao T. Wang (2001). Bounded rationality of economic man: decision making under ecological, social, and institutional constraints. Journal of Bioeconomics 2001(2–3): 217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Loasby Brian J. (1999). Knowledge, institutions, and evolution in economics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Mäki Uskali (2002). Explanatory ecumenism and economics imperialism. Economics and Philosophy 18(2): 235–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marr David (1982). Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  38. Maynard Smith John (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  39. Mayr Ernst (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science 134: 1501–1506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Metcalfe Stanley (1998). Evolutionary economics and creative destruction. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Nelson Richard R., Sidney Winter (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Montague Read P., Gregory S. Berns (2002). Neural economics and the biological substrates of valuation. Neuron 36: 265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Powell Kendall (2003). Economy of the mind. PloS Biology 3: 312–315Google Scholar
  44. Platt Michael L., Paul W. Glimcher (1999). Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex. Nature 400(6741): 233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Robson Arthur J. (2001). Why would nature give individuals utility functions?. Journal of Political Economy 109: 900–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenberg Alex (2005) Lessons from biology for philosophy of the human sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35(1): 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ross Don (2006). The economic and evolutionary basis of selves. Cognitive Systems Research 7: 246–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ross, Don. 2007. Integrating the dynamics of multi-level economic agency. In H. Kincaid & D. Ross (ed.) Oxford Handbook Philosophy of Economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  49. Samuelson Larry (1997). Evolutionary games and equilibrium selection. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Schweber Silvan S. (1968). Darwin and the political economists: divergence of character. Journal of the History of Biology 13: 195–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith Vernon (2003). Constructivist and ecological rationality in economics: Nobel Prize Lecture 2002. American Economic Review 93(3): 465–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sober Elliott, David Sloan Wilson (1998). Unto Others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Tullock Gordon (1971a). The coal tit as a careful shopper. The American Naturalist 105: 77–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tullock Gordon (1971b). Biological externalities. Journal of Theoretical Biology 33: 379–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tullock, Gordon. 1979. Sociobiology and economics. Atlantic Economic Journal: 1–10.Google Scholar
  56. Vromen Jack J. (1995). Economic evolution: an enquiry into the foundations of new institutional economics. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Vromen Jack J. (2003). Why the economic conception of human behavior might lack a biological basis. Theoria 48: 297–323Google Scholar
  58. Vromen Jack J. (2004a). Conjectural revisionary economic ontology: outline of an ambitious research agenda for evolutionary economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 11(2): 213–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vromen Jack J. (2004b). Taking evolution seriously: what difference does it make for economics?. In: Davis J., Marciano A. & Runde J. (ed). The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 102–131Google Scholar
  60. Weibull Jürgen W. (1995). Evolutionary game theory. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson Edward O. (1975). Sociobiology: the new synthesis. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson, Edward O. 1977. Biology and the social sciences. Daedalus: 127–140.Google Scholar
  63. Wilson Edward O. (1998). Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Alfred A. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Witt Ulrich (1991). Economics, sociobiology, and behavioral psychology on preferences. Journal of Economic Psychology 12: 557–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Witt Ulrich (1999). Bioeconomics as economics from a Darwinian perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics 1: 19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Witt Ulrich (2003). The evolving economy: essays on the evolutionary approach to economics. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  67. Young H. Peyton (1998). Individual strategy and social structure: an evolutionary theory of institutions. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  68. Zak Paul J. (2004). Neuroeconomics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 359: 1737–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zak, Paul J. & Arthur T. Denzau. 2001. Economics is an evolutionary science. Pp. 31–65 in S. A. Peterson & A. Somit (ed.) Evolutionary Approaches in the Behavioral Sciences: Toward a Better Understanding of Human Nature. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  70. Zak Paul J., Stephen Knack (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal 111(470): 295–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentErasmus UniversityRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations