1.
Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1995)
MATHGoogle Scholar2.
Acciarri, A., Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Palmieri, M., Rosati, R.: QuOnto: Querying Ontologies. In: Proc. of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2005) pp. 1670–1671 (2005)
3.
Arenas, M., Bertossi, L.E., Chomicki, J.: Consistent query answers in inconsistent databases. In: Proc. of the 18th ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Symp. on Principles of Database Systems (PODS’99) pp. 68–79 (1999)
4.
Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\mathcal{EL}\) envelope. In: Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005) pp. 364–369 (2005)
5.
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F., (Eds.): The description logic handbook: Theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA (2003)
MATHGoogle Scholar6.
Borgida, A., Brachman, R.J.: Conceptual modeling with description logics. In [5], chapter 10, pp. 349–372 (2003)
7.
Borgida, A., Brachman, R.J., McGuinness, D.L., Resnick, L.A.: CLASSIC: a structural data model for objects. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pp. 59–67 (1989)
8.
Bravo, L., Bertossi, L.: Logic programming for consistently querying data integration systems. In: Proc. of the 18th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003), pp. 10–15 (2003)
9.
Calì, A., Lembo, D., Rosati, R.: On the decidability and complexity of query answering over inconsistent and incomplete databases. In: Proc. of the 22nd ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Symp. on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 2003), pp. 260–271 (2003a)
10.
Calì, A., Lembo, D., Rosati, R.: Query rewriting and answering under constraints in data integration systems. In: Proc. of the 18th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003), pp. 16–21 (2003b)
11.
Calvanese, D.: Reasoning with inclusion axioms in description logics: algorithms and complexity. In: Proc. of the 12th Eur. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI’96), pp. 303–307 (1996)
12.
Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Poggi, A., Rosati, R.: Linking data to ontologies: the description logic DL-LiteA. In: Proc. of the 2nd Workshop on OWL: experiences and directions (OWLED 2006) (2006a)
13.
Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: DL-Lite: tractable description logics for ontologies. In: Proc. of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2005), pp. 602–607 (2005)
14.
Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Data complexity of query answering in description logics. In: Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 2006), pp. 260–270 (2006b)
15.
Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Can OWL model football leagues?. In: Proc. of the 3rd Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED 2007) (2007)
16.
Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M.: Answering queries using views over description logics knowledge bases. In: Proc. of the 17th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000) pp. 386–391 (2000)
17.
Chen, P.P.: The entity-relationship model: toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Syst.
1(1), 9–36 (1976)
CrossRefGoogle Scholar18.
De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Poggi, A., Rosati, R.: On the update of description logic ontologies at the instance level. In: Proc. of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2006) (2006)
19.
Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.: Deduction in concept languages: from subsumption to instance checking. J. Log. Comput.
4(4), 423–452 (1994)
MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar20.
Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.:
\({\cal AL}\)-log: integrating datalog and description logics. J. Intell. Inf. Syst.
10(3), 227–252 (1998)
CrossRefGoogle Scholar21.
Duschka, O.M., Genesereth, M.R., Levy, A.Y.: Recursive query plans for data integration. J. Log. Program.
43(1), 49–73 (2000)
MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar22.
Fan, W., Siméon, J.: Integrity constraints for XML. In: Proc. of the 19th ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Symp. on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 2000), pp. 23–34 (2000)
23.
Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic. In: Proc. of the 12th Int. World Wide Web Conf. (WWW 2003), pp. 48–57 (2003)
24.
Hustadt, U., Motik, B., Sattler, U.: Data complexity of reasoning in very expressive description logics. In: Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2005), pp. 466–471 (2005)
25.
Johnson, D.S., Klug, A.C.: Testing containment of conjunctive queries under functional and inclusion dependencies. J. Comput. Syst. Sci.
28(1), 167–189 (1984)
MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar26.
Levy, A.Y., Rousset, M.-C.: Combining horn rules and description logics in CARIN. Artif. Intell.
104(1,2), 165–209 (1998)
MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar27.
Ortiz, M.M., Calvanese, D., Eiter, T.: Characterizing data complexity for conjunctive query answering in expressive description logics. In: Proc. of the 21st Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2006) (2006)
28.
Poggi, A., Lembo, D., Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Linking data to ontologies. Submitted for publication (2007)
29.
Rosati, R.: On the decidability and finite controllability of query processing in databases with incomplete information. In: Proc. of the 25th ACM SIGACT SIGMOD SIGART Symp. on Principles of Database Systems (PODS 2006), pp. 356–365 (2006)
30.
Vardi, M.Y.: The complexity of relational query languages. In: Proc. of the 14th ACM SIGACT Symp. on Theory of Computing (STOC’82), pp. 137–146 (1982)