Augmenting Phenomenology: Using Augmented Reality to Aid Archaeological Phenomenology in the Landscape
Explorations of perception using GIS have traditionally been based on vision and analysis confined to the computer laboratory. In contrast, phenomenological analyses of archaeological landscapes are normally carried out within the particular landscape itself; and computer analysis away from the landscape in question is often seen as anathema to such attempts. This paper presents initial research that aims to bridge this gap by using augmented reality (AR). AR gives us the opportunity to merge the real world with virtual elements, including 3D models, soundscapes, and social media. In this way, aspects of GIS analysis that would usually keep us chained to the desk can be experienced directly in the field at the time of investigation.
KeywordsPhenomenology GIS Augmented reality Archaeological theory
- Archeoguide (2010) ‘ARCHEOGUIDE’. http://archeoguide.intranet.gr/. Accessed 14 Apr 2010.
- ARToolKit (2010). ‘ARToolKit Home Page’. http://www.hitl.washington.edu/artoolkit/. Accessed 14 Apr 2010.
- Bender, B. (1995). Landscape: politics and perspectives. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bender, B., Hamilton, S., & Tilley, C. (2007). Stone worlds: narrative and reflexivity in landscape archaeology. California: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
- Bernardes, J. (2008). Augmented reality games. In O. Leino, H. Wirman, & A. Fernandez (Eds.), Extending experiences. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press.Google Scholar
- Breeze, D. J. (2006). J. Collingwood Bruce’s handbook to the Roman wall (14th ed.). Newcastle upon Tyne: Society of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
- Citroen (2010). ‘NEW CITROËN DS3 official website’. http://www.ds3.citroen.com/uk/#/virtual-reality/. Accessed 12 Jan 2010.
- Crytek (2010). ‘Crytek | CryENGINE2’ http://www.cryengine2.com/. Accessed 14 Apr 2010.
- Gaffney, V., Stancic, Z., & Watson, H. (1996). Moving from catchments to cognition: tentative steps toward a larger archaeological context for GIS anthropology. In M. S. Aldenderfer & H. D. G. Maschner (Eds.), Anthropology, space, and geographic information systems (pp. 132–154). US: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–82). US: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Gillings, M. & Goodrick, G. (1996) Sensuous and Reflexive GIS Exploring Visualisation and VRML. Internet Archaeology 1(1).Google Scholar
- Hallmark (2010). Hallmark | augmented reality. http://www.hallmark.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/article%7C10001%7C10051%7C/HallmarkSite/Cards/AUGMENTED_REALITY. Accessed 12 Jan 2010.
- Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262–271.Google Scholar
- Humphrey, N. (1976). The social function of intellect. In P. P. G. Bateson & R. A. Hinde (Eds.), Growing points in ethology (pp. 303–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. (1999). Archaeological theory: an introduction. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Llobera, M. (1996). Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity, 70(269), 612–622.Google Scholar
- Lombard, M. and T. Ditton (1997). At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(2).Google Scholar
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of perception. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented-reality: a class of displays on the reality–virtuality continuum. Proceedings of Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2531, 282–292.Google Scholar
- Mlekuz, D. (2004). Listening to landscapes: modelling past soundscapes in GIS. Internet Archaeology 16.Google Scholar
- Neves, J., & Camara, A. (2005). Virtual environments and GIS. In P. A. Longley, M. F. Goodchild, D. J. Maguire, & D. W. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems—principles, techniques, management and applications (pp. 557–565). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Ohta, Y., & Tamura, H. (1999). Mixed reality: merging real and virtual worlds. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Renfrew, C. (1997). Virtual archaeology. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.Google Scholar
- Schnabel, M.A. et al., (2007). From virtuality to reality and back. In Proceedings of the IASDR 2007 Conference. International Association of Societies of Design Research. Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
- Shanks, M. (2005). ‘The science question in archaeology’. http://documents.stanford.edu/michaelshanks/77. Accessed 17 Sept 2009.
- Shanks, M. (2008). Post-processual archaeology and after. In R. A. Bentley, H. Maschner, & C. Chippindale (Eds.), Handbook of archaeological theories (pp. 133–147). New York: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
- Thomas, J. (2008). On the ocularcentrism of archaeology. In V. Jorge & J. Thomas (Eds.), Archaeology and the politics of vision in a post-modern context (pp. 1–12). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
- Tilley, C. (1997). A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths and monuments. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
- Tilley, C., Hamilton, S., & Bender, B. (2000). Art and the re-presentation of the past. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(1), 35–62.Google Scholar
- Turner, P. (2007). The intentional basis of presence. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Workshop on Presence (pp.127–134).Google Scholar
- Woolliscroft, D. (2001). Roman military signaling. London: NPI Media Group.Google Scholar