Advertisement

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 440–461 | Cite as

Modelling Temporal Uncertainty in Archaeological Analysis

  • Enrico R. CremaEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses the problem of temporal uncertainty in archaeological analysis and how it affects archaeological interpretation. A probabilistic method is proposed as a potential solution for modelling and quantifying time when high levels of uncertainty restricts temporal knowledge and scientific datings are unavailable, while Monte Carlo simulation is suggested as a means to formally integrate such knowledge into actual analysis. A case study focusing on counts of prehistoric hunter–gatherer pithouses in Mid-Holocene Japan provides an example of how uncertainty can be problematic and bias the results of the most straightforward archaeological analysis and how the coupling of a probabilistic and simulation-based approach nonetheless offers a useful solution. The discussion that follows also addresses the need for more robust and quantifiable ways to illustrate the chronological flow of our archaeological narratives.

Keywords

Temporal uncertainty Monte Carlo methods Chronology Jomon Population dynamics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Andrew Bevan and Mark Lake for constantly supporting my work, with useful suggestions and comments on different versions of the manuscript. Eva Jobbova also commented an early version of the manuscript pointing out what was necessary to enhance its clarity. Fujio Kumon has kindly provided the raw data for Fig. 11b. Special thanks go to the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful and supporting comments and critiques on many aspects of the paper. The Graduate School Research Scholarship of UCL has supported the project financially. Any errors and inconsistencies remain my own.

Supplementary material

10816_2011_9122_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (286 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 285 kb)

References

  1. Adhikari, D. P., Kumon, F., & Kawajiri, K. (2002). Holocene climate variability as deduced from the organic carbon and diatom records in the sediments of Lake Aoki, central Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, 108, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, G. (2007). Time perspectives, palimpsests and the archaeology of time. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 26, 198–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bocquet-Appel, J.-P., Naji, S., Linden, M. V., & Kozlowski, J. K. (2009). Detection of diffusion and contact zones of early farming in Europe from the space-time distribution of 14C dates. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 807–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buck, C. E., Cavanagh, W. G., & Litton, C. D. (1996). Bayesian approach to interpreting archaeological data. Chirchester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Collard, M., Edinborough, K., Shennan, S., & Thomas, M. G. (2010). Radiocarbon evidence indicates that migrants introduced farming to Britain. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 866–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crema, E. R. (in press). Aoristic approaches and voxel models for spatial analysis. In E. Jerem, F. Redő & V. Szeverényi (Eds.), On the road to reconstructing the past. In Proceedings of the 36th annual conference on computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology. Budapest: Archeolingua.Google Scholar
  7. Crema, E. R., Bevan, A., & Lake, M. (2010). A probabilistic framework for assessing spatio-temporal point patterns in the archaeological record. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 1118–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability: a critical introductory treatment (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Fukusawa, H., Yamada, K., & Kato, M. (1999). High-resolution reconstruction of paleoenvironmental changes by using Varved Lake Sediments and Loess-Paleosik Sequences in East Asia Japan [Koshonenko oyobi resu – kodojyotaisekibutsu ni yoru chikyukankyohendo no kouseidofukugen], Bulletin of the National History Musuem [Kokuritsu RekishiMinzokuHakbutsukan KenkyuHoukoku], 81, 463–481, (In Japanese with English Abstract and Title).Google Scholar
  10. Habu, J. (2001). Subsistence-settlment systems and intersite variability in the Moroiso phase of the Early Jomon Period of Japan. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory.Google Scholar
  11. Habu, J. (2002). Jomon collectors and foragers: regional interactions and long-term changes in settlement systems among prehistoric hunter-gatherers in Japan. In B. Fitzhugh & J. Habu (Eds.), Beyond foraging and collecting: evolutionary change in hunter-gatherer settlement systems (pp. 53–72). New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. Habu, J. (2008). Growth and decline in complex hunter-gatherer societies: a case study from the Jomon period Sannai Maruyama site. Japan, Antiquity, 82, 571–584.Google Scholar
  13. Holdaway, S., & Wandsnider, L. (Eds.). (2008). Time in archaeology: time perspectivism revisited. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  14. Imamura, K. (1992). Demography and related trends of the late Early Jomon in the Kanto region [Jomonzenkimatsu no Kanto ni okeru Jinkogenshyo to soreni kanrensuru shyogenshyo]. In: Committee for the Professor Itaru Yoshida memorial book [Yoshida Itaru Sensei Koki Kinenen Ronbunshu Kanko Kai] (Eds.), The Archaeology of Musashino: collected essay for the memorial of Professor Itaru Yoshida [Musashino no Koukogaku: Yoshida Itaru Sensei Koki Kinenen Ronbunshu] (pp. 85–115), Tokyo: Committee for the Professor Itaru Yoshida memorial book [Yoshida Itaru Sensei Koki Kinenen Ronbunshu Kanko Kai], (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  15. Imamura, K. (1996). Prehistoric Japan: New perspectives on insular East Asia. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  16. Imamura, K., (1997). Population dynamics and pithouse counts of Jomon period [Jomon jidai no jyukyoatosu to jinko no hendo]. In Fujimoto, I. (ed.) The Archaeology of Buildings [Hashira no Kokogaku]. (pp. 45–60), Tokyo: Douseisha, (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  17. Izquierdo, L. R., Izquierdo, S. S., Galán, J. M., & Santos, J. I. (2009). Techniques to understand computer simulations: Markov chain analysis. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 12, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/6.html.
  18. Johnson, I. (2004). Aoristic analysis: seeds of a new approach to mapping archaeological distributions through time. In K. F. Ausserer, W. Börner, M. Goriany, & L. Karlhuber-Vöckl (Eds.), [Enter the past] the E-way into the four dimensions of cultural heritage: CAA2003 (pp. 448–452). Oxford: Archaeopress. BAR International Series 1227.Google Scholar
  19. Karlsson, H. (Ed.). (2001). It’s about time: the concept of time in archaeology. Göteborg: Bricoleur Press.Google Scholar
  20. Keally, C. T. (2004). Bad science and the distortion of history: radiocarbon dating in Japanese archaeology. Sophia International Review, 26, 1–16.Google Scholar
  21. Kobayashi, K. (2008). Calendar dates of Jomon period [Jomonjidai no rekinendai]. In Y. Kosugi, Y. Taniguchi, Y. Nishida, W. Mizunoe, & K. Yano (Eds.), The measure of history: methods for the research of Jomon chronology [Rekishi no monosashi: Jomon jidai kenkyu no hennen taikei] (pp. 257–269). Tokyo: Douseisha (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  22. Kudo, Y. (2007). The temporal correspondences between the archaeological chronology and environmental changes from 11,500 to 2,800 cal BP on the Kanto plain, eastern Japan. The Quaternary Research, 46, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lake, M. W., & Woodman, P. E. (2003). Visibility studies in archaeology: a review and case study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 689–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lyman, R. L., & O'Brein, M. J. (2006). Measuring time with artifacts: a history of methods in American archaeology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mayewski, P. A., Rohling, E. E., Stager, J. C., Karlen, W., Maasch, K. A., Meeker, L. D., et al. (2004). Holocene climate variability. Quaternary Research, 62, 242–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murray, T. (Ed.). (1999). Time in archaeology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Nishino, M. (2005). Subsistence-settlement system and large shell-middens of Eastern Tokyo Bay [Tokyowanhigashigan No Oogatakaizuka Wo Sasaeta Seisankyoujyuyoshiki]. In: Meiji University Graduate School of Arts and Letters Department of Archaeology [Meijidaigaku bungakubu koukogaku kenkyushitsu] (Eds.), Regional Culture and Archaeology 1 [Chiiki to Bunka No Koukogaku I] (pp. 695–711). Tokyo: Department of Archaeology, Meiji University, (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  28. Okamura, M. (2005).Cultural Research Management of Contemporary Japan [Gendai nihon no maizobunkazaiseigyo]. In: Narabunkazaikekyujo [Nara National Research Institute for Cultural Properties], M. Sahara, & W. Steinhaus (Eds.), Archaeology of Japan [Nihon no Koukogaku] (pp. 736–742). Tokyo: Gakuseisha, (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  29. Plog, F. T. (1973). Diachronic anthropology. In C. L. Redman (Ed.), Research and theory in current archeology (pp. 181–198). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Premo, L. (2004). Local spatial autocorrelation statistics quantify multi-scale patterns in distributional data: an example from the Maya lowlands. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31, 855–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ramenofsky, A. F. (1998). The illusion of time. In A. F. Ramenofsky & A. Steffen (Eds.), Unit isues in archaeology: measuring time, space, and material (pp. 74–84). Utah: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ratcliffe, J. H. (2000). Aoristic analysis: the spatial interpretation of unspecifed temporal events. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14, 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Robert, C.P. & Casella, G. (2004) Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (2nd Ed.), New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  34. Rowley-Conwy, P. (2001). Time, change, and the archaeology of hunter-gatherers: how original is the 'Original Affluent Society'. In C. Panter-Brick, R. H. Layton, & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Hunter-gatherer: an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 39–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sinn, H.-W. (1980). A rehabilitation of the principle of insufficient reason. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 94, 493–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spaulding, A. C. (1960). The dimensions in archaeology. In G. E. Dole & R. L. Carneiro (Eds.), Essays in the science of culture (pp. 437–456). New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.Google Scholar
  37. Surovell, T. A., & Brantingham, P. J. (2007). A note on the use of temporal frequency distributions in studies of prehistoric demography. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 1868–1877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Suzuki, Y. (2006). Research on settlements of Jomon Period [Jomonjidai shuraku no kenkyu]. Tokyo: Yuzankaku.Google Scholar
  39. Taylor, R. E., & Aitken, M. J. (Eds.). (1997). Chronometric dating in archaeology. London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  40. Uchiyama, J. (2008) Vertical landscape or horizontal landscape? The prehistoric long-term perspectives on the history of the East Asian Inland Seas, in: A. Schottenhammer (Ed.), The East Asian "Mediterranean": Maritime Crossroads of Culture, Commerce and Human Migration, (pp. 25–53) Wiesbaden:Harrassowitz VerlagGoogle Scholar
  41. Uchiyama, J. (2002). The environmental troublemaker's burden?: Jomon perspectives on foraging land use change. In C. Grier, J. Kim, & J. Uchiyama (Eds.), Beyond affluent foragers: rethinking hunter–gatherer complexity (pp. 136–168). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  42. Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., He, Y., Kong, X., An, Z., et al. (2005). The Holocene Asian monsoon: links to solar changes and North Atlantic climate. Science, 308, 854–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Archaeology, UCLLondonUK

Personalised recommendations