Advertisement

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 322–349 | Cite as

Northern Iroquoian Ethnic Evolution: A Social Network Analysis

  • John P. HartEmail author
  • William Engelbrecht
Article

Abstract

Ethnicity is one kind of social relationship that archaeologists explore. The evolution of the northern Iroquoian ethnic landscape in New York, southern Ontario, and the St. Lawrence Valley has been of long-standing interest to archaeologists. Since MacNeish’s (1952) pottery typology study, the predominant model for this evolution has been cladistic. Collar decoration served as a means of signaling attributes of the potter and pottery users that mirrored other more visible signals. We use social network analysis to determine whether pottery collar decoration data best fit MacNiesh’s cladistic or an alternative rhizotic model. The results better fit the rhizotic model.

Keywords

Northern Iroquoian ethnicity Social network analysis Signaling theory Ethnogenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank a number of colleagues who have provided data, copies of reports, draft manuscripts, theses or dissertations, and/or for pointing us to useful literature, as well as for thoughts on Iroquoian pottery. These include Kathleen Allen, Susan Bamann, Ethan Cochrane, Wayne Lenig, R. G. Matson, David Smith, and Ronald Williamson. We thank Jennifer Birch, Ethan Cochrane, Dean Snow, John Terrell, and Ronald Williamson for their thoughtful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. We thank Susan Winchell-Sweeney for the GIS work that allowed the production of Figs. 1 and 3, Jennifer Birch, Eric Jones, Wayne Lenig and Archaeological Services Inc. for providing data that facilitated this work, and Jackie Nadeau for assistance with generation of the distance matrix.

References

  1. Abel, T. J. (2001) The Clayton Cluster: Cultural dynamics of a late prehistoric village cluster in the upper St. Lawrence Valley. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The University at Albany–SUNY. UMI International, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  2. Abler, T., & Tooker, E. (1978). Seneca. In B. G. Trigger (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Northeast (Vol. 15, pp. 505–517). Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, K. M. (1992) Iroquois ceramic production: a case study of household level organization. In G. J. Bey III, & C. A. Pool (Eds.), Ceramic production and distribution: An integrated approach. Boulder: Westview Special Studies in Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, K. M. (2001). Appendix F: Native ceramic attribute description. In M. L. Sempowski & L. P. Saunders (Eds.), Dutch Hollow and Gactory Hollow: The advent of Dutch trade among the Seneca, Part Three (pp. 867–878). Research Records No. 24. Rochester, New York: Rochester Museum and Science Center.Google Scholar
  5. Bamann, S. E. (1993). Settlement nucleation in Mohawk Iroquois prehistory: An analysis of site sequence in the lower Otstungo drainage of the Mohawk Valley. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University at Albany. Ann Arbor, Michigan: UMI International.Google Scholar
  6. Baumann, T. (2004). Defining ethnicity. The SAA Archaeological Record, 4(4), 12–14.Google Scholar
  7. Barth, F. (1969). Introduction. In F. Barth (Ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries (pp. 9–38). Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Beauchamp, W. M. (1900). Aboriginal occupation of New York. New York State Museum Bulletin 32. Albany: The University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
  9. Birch, J. (2010). Coalescent communities in Iroquoian Ontario. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Anthropology, McMaster University.Google Scholar
  10. Blau, H., Campisis, J., & Tooker, E. (1978). Onondaga. In B. G. Trigger (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Northeast (Vol. 15, pp. 491–499). Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  11. Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E. A. (2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borgatti, S. P. (2002). NetDraw: Graph visualization software. Cambridge: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  13. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Cambridge: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  14. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Lablanca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 892–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowser, B. J. (2000). From pottery to politics: An ethnoarchaeological study of political factionalism, ethnicity, and domestic pottery style in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brandão, J. A. (Ed.). (2003). Nation Iroquoise: A seventeenth-century ethnography of the Iroquois (Translated by Brandão J.A., & Ritch, K. J). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brumbach, H. J. (1975). “Iroquoian” ceramics in “Algonkian” territory. Man in the Northeast, 10, 17–28.Google Scholar
  18. Brumbach, H. J. (1985). Ceramic analysis and the investigation of matrilocality at the Smith Mohawk village site. North American Archaeologist, 6, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brumbach, H. J. (1995). Algonquian and Iroquoian ceramics in the Upper Hudson River drainage. Northeast Anthropology, 4, 55–66.Google Scholar
  20. Brumbach, H. J., & Jarvenpa, R. (1989). Ethnoarchaeological and cultural frontiers: Athapaskan, Algonquian and European adaptations in the central subarctic. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Campisi, J. (1978). Oneida. In B. G. Trigger (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Northeast (Vol. 15, pp. 481–490). Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  22. Carr, C. (1995a). Building a unified middle-range theory of artifact design: Historical perspectives and tactics. In C. Carr & J. E. Neitzel (Eds.), Style, society, and person: Archaeological and ethnological perspectives (pp. 151–170). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  23. Carr, C. (1995b). A unified middle-range theory of artifact design. In C. Carr & J. E. Neitzel (Eds.), Style, society, and person: Archaeological and ethnological perspectives (pp. 171–258). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  24. Chafe, W. L., & Foster, M. K. (1981). Prehistoric divergences and recontacts between Cayuga and the other northern Iroquoian languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 47, 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chilton, E. A. (1996). Embodiments of choice: Native American ceramic diversity in the New England interior. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  26. Cochrane, E. E. (2009). Evolutionary explanation and the record of interest: Using evolutionary archaeology and dual-inheritance theory to explain the archaeological record. In S. S. Shennan (Ed.), Pattern and process in cultural evolution (pp. 113–132). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Cochrane, E. E., & Lipo, C. P. (2010). Phylogenetic analyses of Lapita decoration do not support branching evolution or regional population structure during colonization of Remote Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 365, 3889–3902.Google Scholar
  28. Cohen, R. (1978). Ethnicity: Problem and focus in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 7, 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cowgill, G. A. (1990). Why Pearson's r is not a good similarity coefficient for comparing collections. American Antiquity, 55, 512–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dennis, M. (1993). Cultivating a landscape of peace: Iroquois–European encounters in seventeenth-century America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Emerson, J. N. (1956). Understanding Iroquois pottery in Ontario. Toronto: The Ontario Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
  32. Engelbrecht, WE (1971) A stylistic analysis of New York Iroquois pottery. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  33. Engelbrecht, W. E. (1974a). The Iroquois: Archaeological patterning on the tribal level. World Archaeology, 6, 52–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Engelbrecht, W. E. (1974b). Cluster analysis: A method for the study of Iroquois prehistory. Man in the Northeast, 7, 57–70.Google Scholar
  35. Engelbrecht, W. E. (1978). Ceramic patterning between New York Iroquois sites. In I. Hodder (Ed.), The spatial organisation of culture (pp. 141–152). Great Britain: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  36. Engelbrecht, W. E. (1980). Inferring prehistoric social organization in the Northeast. In J. A. Moore (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Northeastern Archaeology (pp. 109–122). Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  37. Engelbrecht, W. E. (1984). The Kleis site ceramics: An interpretive approach. In M. K. Foster, J. Campisi, & M. Mithun (Eds.), Extending the rafters: Interdisciplinary approaches to Iroquoian studies (pp. 325–339). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  38. Engelbrecht, W. E. (1985). New York Iroquois political development. In W. Fitzhough (Ed.), Cultures in contact: The European impact on native cultural institutions in eastern North America, A.D. 1000–1800 (pp. 163–183). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  39. Engelbrecht, W. E. (1995). The case of the disappearing Iroquoians: Early contact period superpower politics. Northeast Anthropology, 50, 35–59.Google Scholar
  40. Engelbrecht, W. E. (1996). Appendix A: Ceramic code and data. In L. E. Sullivan (Ed.), Reanalyzing the Ripley site: Earthworks and late prehistory on the Lake Erie plain. New York State Museum Bulletin 489 (pp. 129–153). Albany: The University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
  41. Engelbrecht, W. E. (1999). Iroquoian ethnicity and archaeological taxa. In R. F. Williamson & C. M. Watts (Eds.), Taming the taxonomy: Toward a new understanding of Great Lakes archaeology (pp. 51–59). Toronto: Eastend Books (in association with the Ontario Archaeological Society, Inc.).Google Scholar
  42. Engelbrecht, W. E. (2003). Iroquoia: The development of a native world. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Fenton, W. N. (1952). The training of historical ethnologists in America. American Anthropologist, 54, 328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fenton, W. N. (1978). Northern Iroquoian culture patterns. In B. G. Trigger (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Northeast (Vol. 15, pp. 296–321). Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  45. Fenton, W. N., & Tooker, E. (1978). Mohawk. In B. G. Trigger (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Northeast (Vol. 15, pp. 466–480). Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  46. Finlayson, W. D. (1998). Iroquoian peoples of the land of rocks and water, A.D. 1000–1650: A study in settlement archaeology, 4 volumes. London, Ontario: London Museum of Archaeology, Special Publication 1.Google Scholar
  47. Fox, W. A., & Garrad, C. (2004). Hurons in an Algonquian land. Ontario Archaeology, 77(78), 121–134.Google Scholar
  48. Galle, J. E. (2010). Costly signaling and gendered social strategies among slaves in the eighteenth-century Chesapeake: An archaeological perspective. American Antiquity, 75, 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Garrad, C., & Heidenreich, C. E. (1978). Khionontateronon (Petun). In B. G. Trigger (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Northeast (Vol. 15, pp. 394–397). Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  50. Gehring, C. T., & Starna, W. (1988). A journey into Mohawk and Oneida country, 1634–1635: The journal of Harmen Meyndertsz van den Bogaert. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hart, J. P. (1999). Another look at “Clemson’s Island. Northeast Anthropology, 57, 19–26.Google Scholar
  52. Hart, J. P., & Brumbach, H. J. (2003). The death of Owasco. American Antiquity, 68, 737–752.Google Scholar
  53. Hart, J. P., & Brumbach, H. J. (2009). On pottery change and northern Iroquoian origins: An assessment from the Finger Lakes region of Central New York. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Houghton, F. (1920). History of the Buffalo Creek Reservation. Publications of the Buffalo Historical Society, 24, 3–184.Google Scholar
  55. Jenkins, R. (2003). Rethinking ethnicity: Identity, categorization, and nationalism. In J. Stone & R. Dennis (Eds.), Race and ethnicity: Comparative and theoretical approaches (pp. 59–71). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Jones, S. (1997). The archaeology of ethnicity: Constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Jordan, K. A. (2008). The Seneca restoration 1715–1754: An Iroquois local political economy. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  58. Kintigh, K. (2010) Tools for quantitative archaeology. Retrieved 26 May 2010 from http://tfqa.com/doc/index.html.
  59. Kroeber, A. L. (1948). Anthropology (revised edition). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  60. Kuhn, R. (1996). A comparison of Mohawk and Onondaga projectile point assemblages. Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology, 12, 27–34.Google Scholar
  61. Latta, M. A. (1976) The Iroquoian cultures of Huronia: A study of acculturation through archaeology. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  62. Lenig, D. (1965). The Oak Hill Horizon and its relation to the development of Five Nations Iroquois culture. Buffalo: New York State Archaeological Association.Google Scholar
  63. Lennox, P. A. & Fitzgerald, W. R. (1990) The culture history and archaeology of the Neutral Iroquoians. In C. J. Ellis & N. Ferris (Eds.), The archaeology of southern Ontario to A.D. 1650. Occasional Publication of the London Chapter, Ontario Archaeological Society No. 5, pp. 405–456.Google Scholar
  64. Lipo, C. P. (2006). The resolution of cultural phylogenies using graphs. In C. P. Lipo, M. J. O'Brien, M. Collard, & S. Shennan (Eds.), Mapping our ancestors: Phylogenetic methods in anthropology and prehistory (pp. 89–108). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  65. Lizee, J. M. (1994) Cross-mending ceramic typologies. Paper presented at the 1994 Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Anthropological Association, Geneseo, New York. Retrieved 16 May 2011 from http://archnet.asu.edu/archives/ceramic/exchange/exchange.html.
  66. Lounsbury, F. G. (1978). Iroquoian languages. In B. G. Trigger (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, Northeast (Vol. 15, pp. 334–344). Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  67. MacDonald, R. I., & Williamson, R. F. (2001). Sweat lodges and solidarity: The archaeology of the Hubbert Site. Ontario Archaeology, 71, 29–71.Google Scholar
  68. MacNeish, R. S. (1952). Iroquois pottery types: A technique for the study of Iroquois prehistory. National Museum of Canada Bulletin No. 124. Ottawa: Canada Department of Resources and Development.Google Scholar
  69. Martelle, H. A. (2002) Huron potters and archaeological constructs: Researching ceramic micro-stylistics. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  70. McElreath, R., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). Shared norms and the evolution of ethnic markers. Current Anthropology, 44, 122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mizoguchi, K. (2009). Nodes and edges: A network approach to hierarchisation and state formation in Japan. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Moore, J. H. (1994). Putting anthropology back together again: The ethnogenetic critique of cladistic theory. American Anthropologist, 96, 925–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Morgan, L. H. (1904). League of the Ho-De-No-Sau-Nee, or Iroquois. A new edition, with additional matter, edited and annotated by Herbert M. Lloyd. Two volumes in one. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.Google Scholar
  74. Munson, J. L., & Macri, M. J. (2009). Sociopolitical network interactions: A case study of the Classic Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 28, 424–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Murdock, G. P. (1981). Atlas of world cultures. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  76. Niemczycki, M. A. P. (1984). The origin and development of the Seneca and Cayuga tribes of New York State. Research Records No. 17. Rochester, New York: Rochester Museum and Science Center.Google Scholar
  77. Perrelli, D. J. (2009). Iroquoian social organization in practice: A small-scale study of gender roles and site formation in western New York. In L. E. Miroff & T. D. Knapp (Eds.), Iroquoian archaeology & analytic scale (pp. 19–50). Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
  78. Pradzynski, A. (2010) McNair ceramic analysis. Unpublished manuscript. Ontario: Archaeological Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  79. Pratt, P. P. (1976). Archaeology of the Oneida Iroquois, vol. 1. Occasional Publications in Northeastern Anthropology, No. 1. George’s Mills, New Hampshire: Man in the Northeast, Inc.Google Scholar
  80. Ramsden, P. G. (1977). A refinement of some aspects of Huron ceramic analysis. Mercury Series, Paper no. 63. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.Google Scholar
  81. Ritchie, W. A. (1952). The Chance horizon: An early stage of Mohawk Iroquois cultural development. New York State Museum Circular 29. Albany: The University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
  82. Robertson, D. A. & Williamson, R. F. (2002) Middle Iroquoian cultural evolution: Similar trajectories within different contexts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Archaeological Association, Ottawa, MayGoogle Scholar
  83. Shennan, S. J. (1997). Quantifying archaeology (2nd ed.). Eidenburgh: Eidenburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Shennan, S. J. (2002). Learning. In J. P. Hart & J. E. Terrell (Eds.), Darwin and archaeology: A handbook of key concepts (pp. 183–200). Westport: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  85. Shennan, S. J., & Steele, J. (1999). Cultural learning in hominids: A behavioral ecological approach. In H. O. Box & K. R. Ginson (Eds.), Mammalian social learning: Comparative and ecological perspectives (pp. 367–388). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Smith, D. G. (1980). An analytical approach to the seriation of Iroquoian pottery. Unpublished MA thesis, Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
  87. Smith, D. G. (1997). Archaeological systematics and the analysis of Iroquoian ceramics: A case study from the Crawford Lake area, Ontario, Canada. Bulletin 15. London, Ontario: London Museum of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  88. Snow, D. R. (1994). The Iroquois. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  89. Snow, D. R. (2009). The multidisciplinary study of human migration: Problems and principles. In P. N. Peregrine, I. Peiros, & M. Feldman (Eds.), Ancient human migrations: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 6–20). Salt Lake City: Santa Fe Institute, University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
  90. Steckley, J. (2007). The words of the Huron. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Taché, K. (2005). Explaining Vinette I pottery variability: The view from the Batiscan site, Québec. Canadian Journal of Archaeology, 29, 165–233.Google Scholar
  92. Tehrani, J. J., & Riede, F. (2008). Towards an archaeology of pedagogy: Learning, teaching and the generation of material culture traditions. World Archaeology, 40, 316–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Terrell, J. E. (2010). Social network analysis of the genetic structure of Pacific islanders. Annals of Human Genetics, 74, 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Thwaites, R. G. (Ed.) (1896–1901) The Jesuit relations and allied documentation: travels and explorations of the Jesuit missionaries in New France, 1610–1791, 73 vols. Cleveland: Burrows Brothers.Google Scholar
  95. Trigger, B. G. (1981). Prehistoric social and political organization: An Iroquoian case study. In D. R. Snow (Ed.), Foundations of northeastern archaeology (pp. 1–50). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  96. Tuck, J. A. (1970). Iroquois cultural development in central New York. PhD Dissertation, Syracuse University. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
  97. Tuck, J. A. (1971). Onondaga Iroquois prehistory: A study in settlement archaeology. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Warrick, G. A. (2000). The precontact Iroquoian occupations of southern Ontario. Journal of World Prehistory, 14, 415–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Warrick, G. A. (2008). A population history of the Huron-Petun, A.D. 500–1650. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Weber, C. J. (1971). Types and attributes in Iroquois pipes. Man in the Northeast, 2, 51–65.Google Scholar
  101. Williams, G. C. (1992). Natural selection: Domains, levels, and challenges. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Williamson, R. F. (1990). The early Iroquoian period of southern Ontario. In C. J. Ellis & N. Ferris (Eds.), The archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650 (pp. 291–320). Occasional Publication 5. London: London Chapter, Ontario Archaeological Society.Google Scholar
  103. Williamson, R. F., Austin, S. J., & Thomas, S. C. (2003). The archaeology of the Grandview site: A fifteenth century Iroquoian community on the north shore of Lake Ontario. Arch Notes, 8(5), 5–49.Google Scholar
  104. Williamson, R. F., & Pfeiffer, S. (2003). Studying the bones of the ancestors. In Williamson, R. F., & Pfeiffer, S. (Eds.), Bones of the ancestors: The archaeology and osteobiography of the Moatfield ossuary (pp. 5–18). Mercury Series Archaeology Paper 163. Gatineau, Quebec: Canadian Museum of Civilization.Google Scholar
  105. Williamson, R. F., & Powis, T. G. (1998). Parsons site ceramic vessels. Ontario Archaeology, 65(66), 53–71.Google Scholar
  106. Williamson, R. F., & Robinson, D. A. (1994). Peer polities beyond the periphery: Early and Middle Iroquoian regional interaction. Ontario Archaeology, 58, 27–43.Google Scholar
  107. Wojtowicz, R. B. (2005). Ceramic vessel analysis. In Robinson, D. A. (Ed.), The 1999 stage 2–4 assessment of part of the Jarrett-Lahmer site (AlGv-18), Lot 17, Concession 5 (WYS), former Township of Vaughan, City of Vaughan, Regional Municipality of York, Ontario (pp. 44–67). Prepared for the Heritage Operation Unit, Ministry of Canada, Toronto by Archaeological Services, Inc., Toronto.Google Scholar
  108. Wojtowicz, R. (2006a). Ceramic artifacts. In Robinson, D. A. (Ed.), The stage 4 salvage excavation of the Baker site (AkGu-15), Lot 11, Concession 2 (WYS), Block 10, O.P.A. 400, Former Township of Vaughn, City of Vaughn, Regional Municipality of York, Ontario (pp. 31–53). Prepared for the Heritage Operation Unit, Ministry of Canada, Toronto by Archaeological Services, Inc., Toronto.Google Scholar
  109. Wojtowicz, R. (2006b). Ceramic artifact analysis. In The archaeology of the Dykstra site (BbGw-5), a report on stage 4 excavations at the Holly secondary planning area (43 T-92026), part of the northwest half of Lot 2, Concession 12, City of Barrie, Simcoe County, Ontario (pp. 19–44). Prepared for the Heritage Operation Unit, Ministry of Canada, Toronto by Archaeological Services, Inc., Toronto.Google Scholar
  110. Wojtowicz, R. B. (2010a) Hope site (AlGv-199) ceramic analysis. Unpublished manuscript. Toronto: Archaeological Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  111. Wojtowicz, R. B. (2010b) Walkington 2 site (AlGu-341) ceramic analysis. Unpublished manuscript. Toronto: Archaeological Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  112. Wright, J. V. (1966). The Ontario Iroquois tradition. Bulletin 210. Ottawa: National Museum of Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research and Collections DivisionNew York State MuseumAlbanyUSA
  2. 2.Anthropology DepartmentBuffalo State CollegeBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations