Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 99–111 | Cite as

Single blastomeres as a source of mouse embryonic stem cells: effect of genetic background, medium supplements, and signaling modulators on derivation efficiency

  • Marta Vila-Cejudo
  • Ot Massafret
  • Josep Santaló
  • Elena IbáñezEmail author
Embryo Biology
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the role of the genetic background, the culture medium supplements, and the presence of modulators of signaling pathways on mouse embryonic stem cell derivation from single blastomeres from 8-cell embryos.

Methods

Mice from permissive and non-permissive genetic backgrounds, different culture media supplements, knockout serum replacement (KSR) and N2B27, and the presence or absence of 2i treatment were used to derive mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) from single blastomeres isolated from 8-cell embryos and from control embryos at the blastocyst stage. After the sixth passage, the putative mESC were analyzed by immunofluorescence to assess their pluripotency and, after in vitro differentiation induction, their ability to differentiate into derivatives of the three primary germ layers. Selected mESC lines derived from single blastomeres in the most efficient culture conditions were further characterized to validate their stemness.

Results

In control embryos, high mESC derivation efficiencies (70–96.9%) were obtained from permissive backgrounds or when embryos were cultured in medium complemented with 2i regardless of their genetic background. By contrast, only blastomeres isolated from embryos from permissive background cultured in KSR-containing medium complemented with 2i were moderately successful in the derivation of mESC lines (22.9–24.5%). Moreover, we report for the first time that B6CBAF2 embryos behave as permissive in terms of mESC derivation.

Conclusions

Single blastomeres have higher requirements than whole blastocysts for pluripotency maintenance and mESC derivation. The need for 2i suggests that modulation of signaling pathways to recreate a commitment towards inner cell mass could be essential to efficiently derive mESC from single blastomeres.

Keywords

Mouse embryonic stem cells ESC derivation ESC culture Blastomere 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Jonatan Lucas for his technical assistance with feeder cell culture, the staff from Servei Estabulari from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona for animal care, and Salvador Bartolomé for his assistance and advice in the design of the qPCR experiments.

Funding

This work has been supported by Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (AGL2014-52408-R) and Generalitat de Catalunya (2014 SGR-524). MVC was beneficiary of a PIF-UAB fellowship and OM is beneficiary of a FI fellowship from the Generalitat de Catalunya.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

Mouse care and procedures were conducted according to the protocols approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal and Human Research of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and by the Departament d’Agricultura, Ramaderia, Pesca I Alimentació of the Generalitat de Catalunya (ref. 8741).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Biswas A, Hutchins R. Embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2007;16:213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Weinberger L, Ayyash M, Novershtern N, Hanna JH. Dynamic stem cell states: naive to primed pluripotency in rodents and humans. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol Nature Publishing Group. 2016;17:155–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981;292:154–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. PNAS. 1981;78:7634–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282:1145–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eistetter HR. Pluripotent embryonal stem cell lines can be established from disaggregated mouse morulae. Development. 1989;31:275–82.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tesar PJ. Derivation of germ-line-competent embryonic stem cell lines from preblastocyst mouse embryos. PNAS. 2005;102:8239–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee K-H, Chuang C-K, Guo S-F, Tu C-F. Simple and efficient derivation of mouse embryonic stem cell lines using differentiation inhibitors or proliferation stimulators. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21:373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Delhaise F, Bralion V, Schuurbiers N, Dessy F. Establishment of an embryonic stem cell line from 8-cell stage mouse embryos. Eur J Morphol. 1996;34:237–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klimanskaya I, Chung Y, Becker S, Lu SJ, Lanza R. Human embryonic stem cell lines derived from single blastomeres. Nature. 2006;444:481–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung Y, Klimanskaya I, Becker S, Marh J, Lu S-J, Johnson J, et al. Embryonic and extraembryonic stem cell lines derived from single mouse blastomeres. Nature. 2006;439:216–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chung Y, Klimanskaya I, Becker S, Li T, Maserati M, Lu SJ, et al. Human embryonic stem cell lines generated without embryo destruction. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:113–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    González S, Ibáñez E, Santaló J. Influence of E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion on mouse embryonic stem cells derivation from isolated blastomeres. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2011;7:494–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wakayama S, Hikichi T, Suetsugu R, Sakaide Y, Bui H-T, Mizutani E, et al. Efficient establishment of mouse embryonic stem cell lines from single blastomeres and polar bodies. Stem Cells. 2007;25:986–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lorthongpanich C, Yang SH, Piotrowska-Nitsche K, Parnpai R, Chan AWS. Development of single mouse blastomeres into blastocysts, outgrowths and the establishment of embryonic stem cells. Reproduction. 2008;135:805–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    González S, Ibáñez E, Santaló J. Establishment of mouse embryonic stem cells from isolated blastomeres and whole embryos using three derivation methods. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:671–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taei A, Hassani SN, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Nokhbatolfoghahai M, Masoudi NS, et al. Enhanced generation of human embryonic stem cells from single blastomeres of fair and poor-quality cleavage embryos via inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase b and Rho-associated kinase signaling. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2661–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Czechanski A, Byers C, Greenstein I, Schrode N, Donahue LR, Hadjantonakis A-K, et al. Derivation and characterization of mouse embryonic stem cells from permissive and nonpermissive strains. Nat Protoc. 2014;9:559–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kawase E, Suemori H, Takahashi N, Okazaki K, Hashimoto K, Nakatsuji N. Strain difference in establishment of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Int J Dev Biol. 1994;38:385–90.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brook FA, Gardner RL. The origin and efficient derivation of embryonic stem cells in the mouse. PNAS. 1997;94:5709–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wakayama T, Perry ACF, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature. 1998;394:369–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gao S, McGarry M, Priddle H, Ferrier T, Gasparrini B, Fletcher J, et al. Effects of donor oocytes and culture conditions on development of cloned mice embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 2003;66:126–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mallol A, Santaló J, Ibáñez E. Improved development of somatic cell cloned mouse embryos by vitamin C and latrunculin A. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wakayama T, Tabar V, Rodriguez I, Perry ACF, Studer L, Mombaerts P. Differentiation of embryonic stem cell lines generated from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer. Science. 2001;292:740–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Costa-Borges N, Gonzalez S, Santaló J, Ibáñez E. Effect of the enucleation procedure on the reprogramming potential and developmental capacity of mouse cloned embryos treated with valproic acid. Reproduction. 2011;141:789–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee K-H. Conditions and techniques for mouse embryonic stem cell derivation and culture. In: Bhartiya D, editor. Pluripotent stem cells. InTech; 2013. p. 85–115.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cheng J, Dutra A, Takesono A, Garrett-Beal L, Schwartzberg PL. Improved generation of C57BL/6J mouse embryonic stem cells in a defined serum-free media. Genesis. 2004;39:100–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chaudhry MA, Vitalis TZ, Bowen BD, Piret JM. Basal medium composition and serum or serum replacement concentration influences on the maintenance of murine embryonic stem cells. Cytotechnology. 2008;58:173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ying QL, Smith AG. Defined conditions for neural commitment and differentiation. Methods Enzymol. 2003;365:327–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith AG, Heath JK, Donaldson DD, Wong GG, Moreau J, Stahl M, et al. Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature. 1988;336:688–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williams RL, Hilton DJ, Pease S, Willson TA, Stewart CL, Gearing DP, et al. Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature. 1988;336:684–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ying Q-L, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature. 2008;453:519–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tamm C, Galitó SP, Annerén C. A comparative study of protocols for mouse embryonic stem cell culturing. PLoS One. 2013;8:e81156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hassani SN, Totonchi M, Farrokhi A, Taei A, Larijani MR, Gourabi H, et al. Simultaneous suppression of TGF-β and ERK signaling contributes to the highly efficient and reproducible generation of mouse embryonic stem cells from previously considered refractory and non-permissive strains. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2012;8:472–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ogawa K, Matsui H, Ohtsuka S, Niwa H. A novel mechanism for regulating clonal propagation of mouse ES cells. Genes Cells. 2004;9:471–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hassani S-N, Pakzad M, Asgari B, Taei A, Baharvand H. Suppression of transforming growth factor β signaling promotes ground state pluripotency from single blastomeres. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1739–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Boroviak T, Loos R, Bertone P, Smith A, Nichols J. The ability of inner-cell-mass cells to self-renew as embryonic stem cells is acquired following epiblast specification. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:516–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Batlle-Morera L, Smith A, Nichols J. Parameters influencing derivation of embryonic stem cells from murine embryos. Genesis. 2008;46:758–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nagy A, Vintersten K, Behringer R. Manipulating the mouse embryo: a laboratory manual. 3rd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harb. Lab Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chatot CL, Ziomek CA, Bavister BD, Lewis JL, Torres I. An improved culture medium support development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil Ltd. 1989;86:679–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ohtsuka S, Niwa H. The differential activation of intracellular signaling pathways confers the permissiveness of embryonic stem cell derivation from different mouse strains. Development. 2015;142:431–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bachvarova R, De Leon V. Polyadenylated RNA of mouse ova and loss of maternal RNA in early development. Dev Biol. 1980;74:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Telford NA, Watson AJ, Schultz GA. Transition from maternal to embryonic control in early mammalian development: a comparison of several species. Mol Reprod Dev. 1990;26:90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bouniol C, Nguyen E, Debey P. Endogenous transcription occurs at the 1-cell stage in the mouse embryo. Exp Cell Res. 1995;218:57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Aoki F, Worrad DM, Schultz RM. Regulation of transcriptional activity during the first and second cell cycles in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev Biol. 1997;181:296–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lu C-W, Yabuuchi A, Chen L, Viswanathan S, Kim K, Daley GQ. Ras-MAPK signaling promotes trophectoderm formation from embryonic stem cells and mouse embryos. Nat Genet. 2008;40:921–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nichols J, Silva J, Roode M, Smith A. Suppression of Erk signalling promotes ground state pluripotency in the mouse embryo. Development. 2009;136(19):3215–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Morgani SM, Canham MA, Nichols J, Sharov AA, Portero R, Ko SHM, et al. Totipotent embryonic stem cells arise in ground-state culture conditions. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1945–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gonzalez JM, Morgani SM, Bone RA, Bonderup K, Abelchian S, Brakebusch C, et al. Embryonic stem cell culture conditions support distinct states associated with different developmental stages and potency. Stem Cell Reports. 2016;7:177–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tighe A, Ray-Sinha A, Staples OD, Taylor SS. GSK-3 inhibitors induce chromosomal instability. BMC Cell Biol. 2007;8:34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Choi J, Huebner AJ, Clement K, Walsh RM, Savol A, Lin K, et al. Prolonged MEK1/2 suppression impairs the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature. 2017;548:219–23.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Weissbein U, Benvenisty N, Ben-David U. Genome maintenance in pluripotent stem cells. J Cell Biol. 2014;204:153–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gaztelumendi N, Nogues C. Chromosome instability in mouse embryonic stem cells. Sci Rep. 2014;4:1–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Vila-Cejudo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ot Massafret
    • 1
  • Josep Santaló
    • 1
  • Elena Ibáñez
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Departament de Biologia Cel·lular, Fisiologia i Immunologia, Facultat de BiociènciesUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  2. 2.Tissue Engineering UnitCentre for Genomic RegulationBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations