Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 173–174 | Cite as

Is it realistic to consider vitamin D as a follicular and serum marker of human oocyte quality?

  • Mauro CozzolinoEmail author
Letter to the Editor

Over the past decade, vitamin D has been spotlighted in many research fields. Nevertheless, numerous publications suggest that its influence on reproductive health is still ambiguous. One of the hypothesis on the importance of vitamin D on the outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technologies arises from their possible effects on endometrial receptivity and immune-modulating effects.

In Ciepiela et al.’s study, the authors demonstrated that patients with vitamin D < 20 ng/ml in follicular fluid had greater probability of having positive hCG; suggesting that vitamin D in follicular fluid could play a role in oocyte development and embryo quality [1]. Having found no significant differences of serum levels between patients with vitamin D < 20 ng/ml or > 20 ng/ml in terms of age, the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of mature MII oocytes, the number of cycles with no available embryo for embryo transfer, and percentage of top quality embryos, Ciepiela et al.’s results are very...

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to warmly thank Mr. Herman David Lòpez Jìmenez (Translinguo Global) for reviewing the use of the English language of the manuscript and for valuable linguistic advice that greatly improved the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ciepiela P, Dulęba AJ, Kowaleczko E, Chełstowski K, Kurzawa R. Vitamin D as a follicular marker of human oocyte quality and a serum marker of in vitro fertilization outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jul;35(7):1265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Powe CE, Evans MK, Wenger J, Zonderman AB, Berg AH, Nalls M, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein and vitamin D status of black Americans and white Americans. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1991–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Magli MC, Crippa A, Muzii L, Boudjema E, Capoti A, Scaravelli G, et al. Head birefringence properties are associated with acrosome reaction, sperm motility and morphology. Reprod BioMed Online. 2012 Mar;24(3):352–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sakkas D, Ramalingam M, Garrido N, Barratt CL. Sperm selection in natural conception: what can we learn from mother nature to improve assisted reproduction outcomes? Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):711–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piccolomini MM, Bonetti TC, Motta E, Serafini PC, Alegretti JR. How general semen quality influences the blastocyst formation rate: analysis of 4205 IVF cycles. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2018;22:89–94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Valenciano de InfertilidadIVI-RMA MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations