Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 79–90 | Cite as

SNPs in ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC1 genes of the DNA repair pathway and risk of male infertility in the Asian populations: association study, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

  • Vertika Singh
  • Sandeep Kumar Bansal
  • D. V. S. Sudhakar
  • Neelabh
  • Arijit Chakraborty
  • Sameer Trivedi
  • Gopal Gupta
  • Kumarasamy Thangaraj
  • Singh RajenderEmail author
  • Kiran SinghEmail author
Genetics

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated if substitutions in the ERCC1, ERCC2, and XRCC1 genes of the DNA repair pathway correlate with non-obstructive azoospermia and male infertility.

Methods

A total of 548 azoospermic infertile males and 410 fertile controls were genotyped for XRCC1 399A > G, 280G > A, and ERCC1 C > A 3′ UTR and 541 azoospermic infertile males and 416 fertile controls were genotyped for ERCC2 751A > C using iPLEX Gold Assay. Meta-analyses were performed on XRCC1 399A > G (1022 cases and 1004 controls), ERCC1 C > A 3′ UTR (879 cases and 1059 controls), and ERCC2 751A > C (914 cases and 850 controls) polymorphisms to quantitatively estimate the significance of the association between these polymorphisms and the risk of infertility.

Results

Statistically significant association between ERCC2 751A > C SNP and male infertility was found using the codominant model (p = 0.03). Results of meta-analysis suggested a lack of correlation with male infertility risk, which could be due to pooling of studies from different ethnic populations. Due to limited the number of studies, a stratified analysis for different ethnic groups could not be performed.

Conclusion (s)

In conclusion, AA genotype of 751A > C SNP in ERCC2 correlated with a higher risk of male infertility and may contribute to an increased risk of azoospermia and male infertility in Indian men.

Keywords

DNA repair Polymorphisms Infertility Spermatogenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients for providing blood samples.

Funding information

This work was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) with grant number BSC0101 awarded to Rajender Singh and the University Grant Commission (UGC), Govt. of India grant (UGC Approval letter No: F 42-47/2013) awarded to Kiran Singh. Vertika Singh was provided SRF by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Govt. of India.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was approved by the Institutional Human Ethics Committee of the Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi approved this study (Approval letter No. Dean/2011-12/119).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

10815_2018_1339_Fig5_ESM.png (114 kb)
Supplementary figure 1

Representative gel picture showing absence of Y chromosome microdeletion in patients for eleven sets of sequence-tagged site (STS) markers (STSs: sY83, sY84, sY69, sY117, sY152, sY255, sY254, sY157, sY158, sY159, sY160). M represents molecular weight marker. (PNG 114 kb)

10815_2018_1339_MOESM1_ESM.tif (1.1 mb)
High resolution image (TIF 1095 kb)
10815_2018_1339_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (35 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 34 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Huynh T, Mollard R, Trounson A. Selected genetic factors associated with male infertility. Hum Reprod Update Oxford University Press. 2002;8:183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dohle GR, Colpi GM, Hargreave TB, Papp GK, Jungwirth A, Weidner W. EAU guidelines on male infertility. Eur Urol. 2005; 703–11.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matsuzaka Y, Makino S, Okamoto K, Oka A, Tsujimura A, Matsumiya K, et al. Susceptibility locus for non-obstructive azoospermia is localized within the HLA-DR/DQ subregion: primary role of DQB1* 0604. HLA Wiley Online Library. 2002;60:53–63.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zheng L, Wang X, Zhou D, Zhang J, Huo Y, Tian H. Association between XRCC1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and infertility with idiopathic azoospermia in northern Chinese Han males. Reprod Biomed Online. Elsevier. 2012;25:402–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakkas D, Alvarez JG. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil Steril Elsevier. 2010;93:1027–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gunes S, Al-Sadaan M, Agarwal A. Spermatogenesis, DNA damage and DNA repair mechanisms in male infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;309–19.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gu A, Ji G, Liang J, Xia Y, Lu N, Wu B, et al. DNA repair gene XRCC1 and XPD polymorphisms and the risk of idiopathic azoospermia in a Chinese population. Int J Mol Med Spandidos Publications. 2007;20:743–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jansen J, Olsen AK, Wiger R, Naegeli H, de Boer P, van der Hoeven F, et al. Nucleotide excision repair in rat male germ cells: low level of repair in intact cells contrasts with high dual incision activity in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res Oxford University Press. 2001;29:1791–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olsen A-K, Bjørtuft H, Wiger R, Holme J, Seeberg E, Bjørås M, et al. Highly efficient base excision repair (BER) in human and rat male germ cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Oxford University Press. 2001;29:1781–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sankhwar M, Sankhwar SN, Bansal SK, Gupta G, Rajender S. Polymorphisms in the XPC gene affect urinary bladder cancer risk: a case-control study, meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Sci Rep. Nature Publishing Group. 2016;6:27018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ji G, Gu A, Xia Y, Lu C, Liang J, Wang S, et al. ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms and risk of idiopathic azoospermia in a Chinese population. Reprod Biomed Online Elsevier. 2008;17:36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsia K-T, Millar MR, King S, Selfridge J, Redhead NJ, Melton DW, et al. DNA repair gene Ercc1 is essential for normal spermatogenesis and oogenesis and for functional integrity of germ cell DNA in the mouse. Development The Company of Biologists Ltd. 2003;130:369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson LH, Brookman KW, Jones NJ, Allen SA, Carrano AV. Molecular cloning of the human XRCC1 gene, which corrects defective DNA strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:6160–71 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=362891&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahmed EA, de Boer P, Philippens MEP, Kal HB, de Rooij DG. Parp1–XRCC1 and the repair of DNA double strand breaks in mouse round spermatids. Mutat Res Mol Mech Mutagen Elsevier. 2010;683:84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geredeli C, Artac M, Yildirim S, Inal A, Dede I, Guler T, et al. Prognostic value of ERCC1, ERCC2, XRCC1, and TP53 single nucleotide polymorphisms in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Tumor Biol Springer. 2015;36:4279–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yin M, Yan J, Martinez-Balibrea E, Graziano F, Lenz H-J, Kim H-J, et al. ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms predict clinical outcomes of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapies in gastric and colorectal cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res. AACR. 2011;17:1632–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang B, Wang H, Gao X-K, Chen B-Q, Zhang Y-Q, Liu H-L, et al. Expression and significance of Rap1A in testes of azoospermic subjects. Asian J Androl. 2004;6:35–40.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Okuda K, Sasaki H, Hikosaka Y, Kawano O, Yukiue H, Yano M, et al. Excision repair cross complementation group 1 polymorphisms predict overall survival after platinum-based chemotherapy for completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. J Surg Res Elsevier. 2011;168:206–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matullo G, Peluso M, Polidoro S, Guarrera S, Munnia A, Krogh V, et al. Combination of DNA repair gene single nucleotide polymorphisms and increased levels of DNA adducts in a population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers. AACR. 2003;12:674–7.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dhillon VS, Yeoh E, Fenech M. DNA repair gene polymorphisms and prostate cancer risk in South Australia—results of a pilot study. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig, Elsevier. 2011:641–6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ji G, Gu A, Zhu P, Xia Y, Zhou Y, Hu F, et al. Joint effects of XRCC1 polymorphisms and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposure on sperm DNA damage and male infertility. Toxicol Sci Oxford University Press. 2010;116:92–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ghasemi H, Khodadadi I, Fattahi A, Moghimbeigi A, Tavilani H. Polymorphisms of DNA repair genes XRCC1 and LIG4 and idiopathic male infertility. Syst Biol Reprod Med. Taylor & Francis. 2017;63:382–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu CL, Jiao HY, Ma Q, Wu X, Jia ST, Jing WH, et al. Relationship between ERCC2 single nucleotide polymorphisms and male idiopathic infertility in Ningxia. Zhonghua nan ke xue= Natl J Androl. 2014;20:419–22.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cooper TG, Noonan E, von Eckardstein S, Auger J, Baker HWG, Behre HM, et al. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:231–45 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19934213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl cancer Inst. Oxford University Press. 1959;22:719–48.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials Elsevier. 1986;7:177–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses. Int J Epidemiol Oxford University Press. 2008;38:287–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. British Medical Journal Publishing Group. 2011;343:d5928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bansal SK, Jaiswal D, Gupta N, Singh K, Dada R, Sankhwar SN, et al. Gr/gr deletions on Y-chromosome correlate with male infertility: an original study, meta-analyses, and trial sequential analyses. Sci Rep. Nature Publishing Group. 2016;6:19798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carlus SJ, Sarkar S, Bansal SK, Singh V, Singh K, Jha RK, et al. Is MTHFR 677 C> T polymorphism clinically important in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)? A case-control study, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. PLoS One. Public Library of Science. 2016;11:e0151510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tsuchiya N, Mishina M, Narita S, Kumazawa T, Inoue T, Horikawa Y, et al. Association of XRCC1 gene polymorphisms with the susceptibility and chromosomal aberration of testicular germ cell tumors. Int J Oncol Spandidos Publications. 2006;28:1217–23.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mirsane SA, Oraei N. Alcohol consumption and polymorphism of XRCC1 gene: two serious dangers for males’ fertility. Nephrourol Mon Kowsar. 2017;9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosell R, Taron M, Ariza A, Barnadas A, Mate JL, Reguart N, et al. Molecular predictors of response to chemotherapy in lung cancer. Semin Oncol. Elsevier. 2004:20–7.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moullan N, Cox DG, Angèle S, Romestaing P, Gérard J-P, Hall J. Polymorphisms in the DNA repair gene XRCC1, breast cancer risk, and response to radiotherapy. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers AACR. 2003;12:1168–74.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sak SC, Barrett JH, Paul AB, Bishop DT, Kiltie AE. DNA repair gene XRCC1 polymorphisms and bladder cancer risk. BMC Genet. BioMed Central. 2007;8:13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yan L, Li Q, Li X, Ji H, Zhang L. Association studies between XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3 polymorphisms and differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem Karger Publishers. 2016;38:1075–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lunn RM, Helzlsouer KJ, Parshad R, Umbach DM, Harris EL, Sanford KK, et al. XPD polymorphisms: effects on DNA repair proficiency. Carcinogenesis Oxford University Press. 2000;21:551–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Liu S-Y, Zhang C-J, Peng H-Y, Sun H, Lin K-Q, Huang X-Q, et al. Strong association of SLC1A1 and DPF3 gene variants with idiopathic male infertility in Han Chinese. Asian J Androl. Medknow Publications. 2017;19:486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular & Human GeneticsBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Division of EndocrinologyCentral Drug Research InstituteLucknowIndia
  3. 3.CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB)HyderabadIndia
  4. 4.Department of Zoology (MMV)Banaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  5. 5.Department of Urology, Institute of Medical SciencesBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations