Semen parameters on the day of oocyte retrieval predict low fertilization during conventional insemination IVF cycles
Poor fertilization during conventional IVF is difficult to predict in the absence of abnormal semen parameters; large-scale studies are lacking. The purpose of this study is to evaluate factors associated with low fertilization rates in conventional insemination IVF cycles.
A retrospective cohort study evaluating demographic, reproductive evaluation, and IVF cycle characteristics to identify predictors of low fertilization (defined as 2PN/MII ≤ 30% per cycle). Participants were included if they were undergoing their first IVF cycle utilizing fresh autologous oocytes and conventional insemination with male partner’s sperm (with normal pretreatment semen analysis). They were randomly divided into a training set and a validation set; validation modeling with logistic regression and binary distribution was utilized to identify covariates associated with low fertilization.
Postprocessing sperm concentration of less than 40 million/ml and postprocessing sperm motility < 50% on the day of retrieval were the strongest predictors of low fertilization in the training dataset. Next, in the validation set, cycles with either low postprocessing concentration (≤ 40 million/ml) or low postprocessing progressive motility (≤ 50%) were 2.9–times (95% CI 1.4, 6.2) more likely to have low fertilization than cycles without either risk factor. Furthermore, cycles with low postprocessing concentration and progressive motility were 13.4 times (95% CI 4.01, 45.06) more likely to have low fertilization than cycles without either risk factor.
Postprocessing concentration and progressive motility on the day of oocyte retrieval are predictive of low fertilization in conventional IVF cycles with normal pretreatment diagnostic semen analysis parameters.
KeywordsIn vitro fertilization Conventional insemination Assisted reproductive technologies Semen analysis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 7.Mahutte NG, Arici A. Failed fertilization: is it predictable? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15(3):211–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000072858.73466.aa.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Segal TR, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Chiu Y-H, Williams PL, Nassan FL, Dadd R, et al. Urinary concentrations of 3-(diethylcarbamoyl) benzoic acid (DCBA), a major metabolite of N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) and semen parameters among men attending a fertility center. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(12):2532–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human sperm. World Health Organizion,. 2010.Google Scholar
- 14.Dewailly D, Lujan ME, Carmina E, Cedars MI, Laven J, Norman RJ, et al. Definition and significance of polycystic ovarian morphology: a task force report from the Androgen Excess and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Society. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20(3):334–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt061.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Eftekhar M, Mohammadian F, Yousefnejad F, Molaei B, Aflatoonian A. Comparison of conventional IVF versus ICSI in non-male factor, normoresponder patients. Iranian J Reprod. Med. 2012;10(2):131–6.Google Scholar