Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 1.4k Downloads
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best protocol to prepare endometrium for frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycles.
This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Following PubMed and OvidSP search, a total of 1166 studies published after 1990 were identified following removal of duplicates. Following exclusion of studies not matching our inclusion criteria, a total of 33 studies were analyzed. Primary outcome measure was live birth. The following protocols, including true natural cycle (tNC), modified natural cycle (mNC), artificial cycle (AC) with or without suppression, and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) with gonadotropin (Gn) or aromatase inhibitor (AI), were compared.
No statistically significant difference for both clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted between tNC and mNC groups. When tNC and AC without suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate in favor of tNC, whereas it failed to reach statistical significance for live birth. When tNC and AC with suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in live birth rate favoring the latter. Similar pregnancy outcome was noted among mNC versus AC with or without suppression groups. Similarly, no difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted when ACs with or without suppression groups are compared.
There is no consistent superiority of any endometrial preparation for FER. However, mNC has several advantages (being patient-friendly; yielding at least equivalent or better pregnancy rates when compared with tNC and AC with or without suppression; may not require LPS). Mild OS with Gn or AI may be promising.
KeywordsFrozen embryo replacement Endometrial preparation Thawed embryo transfer Assisted reproduction Meta-analysis
- 4.European IVFMC, European Society of Human R, European IVFMC, European Society of Human R, Embryology, Kupka MS, D’Hooghe T, Ferraretti AP, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):233–48. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev319.Google Scholar
- 6.CDC. Assisted reproductive technology, National summary report. 2013.Google Scholar
- 12.Fauser BC, de Jong D, Olivennes F, Wramsby H, Tay C, Itskovitz-Eldor J, et al. Endocrine profiles after triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist after cotreatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix during ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):709–15. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.2.8197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ezoe K, Daikoku T, Yabuuchi A, Murata N, Kawano H, Abe T, et al. Ovarian stimulation using human chorionic gonadotrophin impairs blastocyst implantation and decidualization by altering ovarian hormone levels and downstream signaling in mice. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20(11):1101–16. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gau065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Horcajadas JA, Minguez P, Dopazo J, Esteban FJ, Dominguez F, Giudice LC, et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation induces a functional genomic delay of the endometrium with potential clinical implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(11):4500–10. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.El Bahja D. Frozen embryo transfer protocol: does spontaneous cycle give good results? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2012.Google Scholar
- 23.Yishia D. Do we need to artificially prepare the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer in normal cycling women? A controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:112.Google Scholar
- 24.Belaisch-Allart J. Clinical management of a frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycle. Abstracts of the 10th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE Brussels. 1994:138-9.Google Scholar
- 25.Gonzales J. Natural cycle and hormonal replacement in FET: implantation and pregnancy rates. Abstract Book of the 48th Meeting of the American Fertility Society. 1992:42.Google Scholar
- 26.Cattoli M. Arandomized prospective studyon cryopreserved-thawedembryo transfer: natural versus homrone replacement cycles. Abstracts of the 10th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE Brussels. 1994;356:139.Google Scholar
- 28.Dolan P. Natural cycles and estrogen/progestone induced cycles produce an equallly receptive endometrium for implantation of cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod (Oxford, England) 1991:16.Google Scholar
- 31.Azimi Nekoo E, Chamani M, Shahrokh Tehrani E, Hossein Rashidi B, Davari Tanha F, Kalantari V. Artificial endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with or without pretreatment with depot gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist in women with regular menses. J Fam Reprod Health. 2015;9(1):1–4.Google Scholar
- 33.Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(6):2054–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.11.036.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Chang EM, Han JE, Kim YS, Lyu SW, Lee WS, Yoon TK. Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes : cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(4):369–74. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9530-4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Hill MJ, Miller KA, Frattarelli JL. A GnRH agonist and exogenous hormone stimulation protocol has a higher live-birth rate than a natural endogenous hormone protocol for frozen-thawed blastocyst-stage embryo transfer cycles: an analysis of 1391 cycles. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):416–22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.11.027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Lathi RB, Chi YY, Liu J, Saravanabavanandhan B, Hegde A, Baker VL. Frozen blastocyst embryo transfer using a supplemented natural cycle protocol has a similar live birth rate compared to a programmed cycle protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015;32(7):1057–62. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0499-x.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 56.Nekoo EA, Chamani M, Tehrani ES, Rashidi BH, Tanha FD, Kalantari V. Artificial endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with or without pretreatment with depot gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist in women with regular menses. J Fam Reprod Health. 2014;9(1):1–4.Google Scholar
- 62.Griesinger G, Weig M, Schroer A, Diedrich K, Kolibianakis EM. Mid-cycle serum levels of endogenous LH are not associated with the likelihood of pregnancy in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles without pituitary suppression. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2589–93. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 70.Wang Y, He Y, Zhao X, Ji X, Hong Y, Wang Y, et al. Crinone gel for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a prospective randomized clinical trial in the Chinese population. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133027.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 71.Shapiro DB, Pappadakis JA, Ellsworth NM, Hait HI, Nagy ZP. Progesterone replacement with vaginal gel versus i.m. injection: cycle and pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients receiving vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(8):1706–11. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu121.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 74.Gingold JA, Lee JA, Rodriguez-Purata J, Whitehouse MC, Sandler B, Grunfeld L, et al. Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(3):620–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.05.036. e5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 75.Balaban B, Urman B, Ata B, Isiklar A, Larman MG, Hamilton R, et al. A randomized controlled study of human Day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(9):1976–82. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar