Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 155–168 | Cite as

Development of a security system for assisted reproductive technology (ART)

  • Yong Soo HurEmail author
  • Eun Kyung Ryu
  • Sung Jin Park
  • Jeong Yoon
  • San Hyun Yoon
  • Gi Deok Yang
  • Chang Young Hur
  • Won Don Lee
  • Jin Ho Lim
Technological Innovations

Abstract

Purpose

In the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART), medical accidents can result in serious legal and social consequences. This study was conducted to develop a security system (called IVF-guardian; IG) that could prevent mismatching or mix-ups in ART.

Materials and methods

A software program was developed in collaboration with outside computer programmers. A quick response (QR) code was used to identify the patients, gametes and embryos in a format that was printed on a label. There was a possibility that embryo development could be affected by volatile organic components (VOC) in the printing material and adhesive material in the label paper. Further, LED light was used as the light source to recognize the QR code. Using mouse embryos, the effects of the label paper and LED light were examined. The stability of IG was assessed when applied in clinical practice after developing the system. A total of 104 cycles formed the study group, and 82 cycles (from patients who did not want to use IG because of safety concerns and lack of confidence in the security system) to which IG was not applied comprised the control group.

Results

Many of the label paper samples were toxic to mouse embryo development. We selected a particular label paper (P touch label) that did not affect mouse embryo development. The LED lights were non-toxic to the development of the mouse embryos under any experimental conditions. There were no differences in the clinical pregnancy rates between the IG-applied group and the control group (40/104 = 38.5 % and 30/82 = 36.6 %, respectively).

Conclusions

The application of IG in clinical practice did not affect human embryo development or clinical outcomes. The use of IG reduces the misspelling of patient names. Using IG, there was a disadvantage in that each treatment step became more complicated, but the medical staff improved and became sufficiently confident in ART to offset this disadvantage. Patients who received treatment using the IG system also went through a somewhat tedious process, but there were no complaints. These patients gained further confidence in the practitioners over the course of treatment.

Keywords

Mix-up Mismatching Security system Assisted reproductive technology (ART) 

References

  1. 1.
    Mortimer D, Mortimer ST. Quality and Risk Management in the IVF Laboratory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bender L. ‘To err is human’. ART mix-ups: A labor-based, relational proposal. J Gender Race & Justice. 2006;9:1–90.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liebler R. Are you my parent? Are you my child? The role of genetics and race in defining relationships after reproductive technological mistakes. Depaul J Health Care Law. 2002;5:15–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Spriggs M. IVF mixup: white couple have black babies. J Med Ethics. 2003;29:65. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.2.65.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams S, Carthey J. IVF Witnessing and Electronic Systems—final report 2006. 2010.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Magli MC, Van den Abbeel E, Lundin K, Royere D, Van der Elst J, Gianaroli L. Committee of the Special Interest Group on Embryology. Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1253–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nyboe Andersen A, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Ferraretti AP, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, et al. European IVF-Monitoring (EIM) Consortium, For the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe. 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1267–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brison DR, Hooper M, Critchlow JD, Hubter HR, Arnesen R, Lloyd A, et al. Reducing risk in the IVF laboratory: implementation of a double witnessing system. Clinical Risk. 2004;10:176–80. doi: 10.1258/1356262041591131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perrin RA, Simpson N. RFID and bar codes–critical importance in enhancing safe patient care. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2004;18:33–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feeley J. Image-based ID boosts read rates; solution to difficult, dirty barcode read application replaced over-matched laser scanner, improves plant efficiency. Control design for machine builders. 2013. http://www.controldesign.com/articles/2013/feeley-image-based-id-boosts-read-rates/?show=all. Accessed 09 jul 2013.
  11. 11.
    Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8:299–308.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Bar Code Book – Palmer R. C. 5th ed. Helmers Publishing; 2007.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Glew AM, Hoha K, Graves J, Lawrence H, Read S, Ah-Moye M. Radio frequency identity tags ‘RFID’ for electronic witnessing of IVF laboratory procedures. Fertil Steril. 2006;86 Suppl 1:S170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gye MC, Park CJ. Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system. Cli Exp Reprod Med. 2012;39:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aitken RJ, Bennetts LE, Sawyer D, Wiklendt AM, King BV. Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int J Androl. 2005;28:171–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00531.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lai H, Singh NP. Acute exposure to a 60Hz magnetic field increases DNA strand breaks in rat brain. Bioelectromagnetics. 1998;18:156–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meltz ML. Radiofrequency exposure and mammalian cell toxicity, genotoxicity, and transformation. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003;24:S196–213. doi: 10.1002/bem.10176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tice RR, Hook GG, Donner M, McRee DI, Guy AW. Genotoxicity of radiofrequency signals I Investigation of DNA damage and micronuclei induction in cultured human blood cells. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002;23:113–26. doi: 10.1002/bem.104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vijaylaxmi N, Mohan N, Meltz ML, Wittler MA. Proliferation and cytogenetic studies in human blood lymphocytes exposed in vitro to 2450 MHz radiofrequency radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 1997;72:751–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Novo S, Barrios L, Santaló J, Gómez-Martínez R, Duch M, Esteve J, et al. Anovel embryo identification system by direct tagging of mouse embryos using silicon-based bar codes. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:96–105. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Novo S, Penon O, Barrios L, Nogués C, Santaló J, Durán S, et al. Direct embryo tagging and identification system by attachment of biofunctionalized polysilicon barcodes to the zona pellucida of mouse embryos. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1519–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Novo S, Morató R, Penon O, Duran S, Barrios L, Nogués C, et al. Identification of bovine embryos cultured in group by attachment of bar codes to the zona pellucida. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2013. doi: 10.1071/rd13066.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Novo S, Ibáñez E, Barrios L, Castell O, Nogués C. Biomolecule screening for efficient attachment of biofunctionalized microparticles to the zona pellucida of mammalian oocytes and embryos. Biomed Microdevices. 2013;15:801–9. doi: 10.1007/s10544-013-9766-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Novo S, Nogués C, Penon O, Barrios L, Santaló J, Gómez-Martínez R, et al. Barcode tagging of human oocytes and embryos to prevent mix-ups in assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:18–28. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong Soo Hur
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eun Kyung Ryu
    • 1
  • Sung Jin Park
    • 1
  • Jeong Yoon
    • 2
  • San Hyun Yoon
    • 2
  • Gi Deok Yang
    • 3
  • Chang Young Hur
    • 1
  • Won Don Lee
    • 1
  • Jin Ho Lim
    • 1
  1. 1.Maria Fertility HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Maria Fertility Research CenterSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Maria BiotechSeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations