Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 31, Issue 10, pp 1397–1400 | Cite as

Live birth after 6 years of oocyte vitrification in a survivor with breast cancer

  • Eduardo Leme Alves da MottaEmail author
  • Monique Bonavita
  • José Roberto Alegretti
  • Maurício Chehin
  • Paulo Serafini
Fertility Preservation

Introduction

Because of scientific developments, life has been extended in recent decades, and among all diseases, cancer has gained a greater dimension and is recognized as a public health topic worldwide. There has been a major focus on breast cancer, which is recognized as the most common malignancy in women [1].

In 2012, there were an estimated 230,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer in the USA, mainly after menopause [2]. However, breast cancer at the reproductive age is considered a worst and invasive prognosis, for which chemotherapy using high doses of alkylating agents and radiotherapy with ionizing radiation should be applied. Such approach is known to reduce the primordial follicle reserve and cause premature ovarian failure, possibly with genetic damage to growing eggs [3].

Advances in reproductive techniques have provided many fertility preservation options [4]. However, initial trials on oocyte cryopreservation were limited by spindle misalignment and errors in the...

Keywords

Ovarian Reserve Fertility Preservation Premature Ovarian Failure Antral Follicle Count Oocyte Cryopreservation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Dunn NA, Muller JM, Pyke CM, Baade PD. The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36:237–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reddy J, Oktay K. Ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation with the use of aromatase inhibitors in women with breast cancer. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1363–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cobo A, Domingo J, Perez S, Crespo J, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Vitrification: an effective new approach to oocyte banking and preserving fertility in cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol Off Publ Fed Span Oncol Soc Natl Cancer Inst Mex. 2008;10:268–73.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith GD, Motta EE, Serafini P. Theoretical and experimental basis of oocyte vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:298–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vajta G, Kuwayama M. Improving cryopreservation systems. Theriogenology. 2006;65:236–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martinez-Burgos M, Herrero L, Megias D, Salvanes R, Montoya MC, Cobo AC, et al. Vitrification versus slow freezing of oocytes: effects on morphologic appearance, meiotic spindle configuration, and DNA damage. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:374–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Oktay K. Fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;53:753–62.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2013;31:2500–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ASRM PCo. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rienzi L, Romano S, Albricci L, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Baroni E, et al. Embryo development of fresh ‘versus’ vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:66–73.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ubaldi F, Anniballo R, Romano S, Baroni E, Albricci L, Colamaria S, et al. Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate achieved with oocyte vitrification and cleavage stage transfer without embryo selection in a standard infertility program. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1199–205.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garcia-Velasco JA, Domingo J, Cobo A, Martinez M, Carmona L, Pellicer A. Five years’ experience using oocyte vitrification to preserve fertility for medical and nonmedical indications. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1994–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noyes N, Porcu E, Borini A. Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18:769–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grifo JA, Noyes N. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:391–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parmegiani L, Garello C, Granella F, Guidetti D, Bernardi S, Cognigni GE, et al. Long-term cryostorage does not adversely affect the outcome of oocyte thawing cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:374–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cobo A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Domingo J, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Is vitrification of oocytes useful for fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline and in cancer patients? Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1485–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuwayama M. Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. Theriogenology. 2007;67:73–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eduardo Leme Alves da Motta
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Monique Bonavita
    • 2
  • José Roberto Alegretti
    • 1
  • Maurício Chehin
    • 1
  • Paulo Serafini
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Huntington Reproductive MedicineSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Centre of Human ReproductionHospital e Maternidade Santa JoanaSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Gynecology Department of Paulista School of MedicineFederal University of Sao Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP)Sao PauloBrazil
  4. 4.Gynecology Discipline of School of MedicineUniversity of Sao Paulo (USP)Sao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations