Efficacy of swim-up versus density gradient centrifugation in improving sperm deformity rate and DNA fragmentation index in semen samples from teratozoospermic patients
- 357 Downloads
To compare the efficacy of swim-up and DGC in improving sperm deformity and DNA fragmentation and to determine which method is better in teratozoospermic patients requiring artificial reproduction.
The present study compared the effects of swim-up and density gradient centrifugation (DGC), the two most commonly used semen preparation methods, on sperm deformity rate and DNA fragmentation index (DFI) in semen samples from teratozoospermic patients.
The results demonstrated that both swim-up and DGC yielded a significantly lower sperm deformity rate and DFI in comparison to unprocessed whole semen, with DGC having more favorable results. Sperm deformity rate in unprocessed whole semen samples was significantly lower in the 20–29 age group than in the 40-49 age group, but no significant difference was observed in DFI between different age groups. There was no significant correlation between sperm deformity rate and DFI.
Our findings suggest that enrichment of sperm with normal morphology and intact DNA in teratozoospermic patients could be achieved by both DGC and swim-up procedures, and that DGC is a better method.
KeywordsTeratozoospermia Sperm preparation Semen analysis DNA fragmentation
This work was supported by the Social Development Research Project for Science and Technology of Shaanxi Province, China (No. 2011 K15-02-01), the Research Project of Health Department of Shaanxi Province, China (No. 2012D6), and Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2012B040304010)
- 12.World Health Organization. Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
- 17.Chiamchanya C, Kaewnoonual N, Visutakul P, Manochantr S, Chaiya J. Comparative study of the effects of three semen preparation media on semen analysis, DNA damage and protamine deficiency, and the correlation between DNA integrity and sperm parameters. Asian J Androl. 2010;12:271–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hashimoto S, Goda S, Akamatsu Y, Yamanaka M, Morimoto Y. Effects of sperm preparation on sperm DNA fragmentation and morphology. RBM Online. 2008;16:S28.Google Scholar
- 26.Plastira K, Msaouel P, Angelopoulou R, Zanioti K, Plastiras A, et al. The effects of age on DNA fragmentation, chromatin packaging and conventional semen parameters in spermatozoa of oligoasthenoteratozoospermic patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:437–43.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar