Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 107–116 | Cite as

The presence of 1 mM glycine in vitrification solutions protects oocyte mitochondrial homeostasis and improves blastocyst development

  • Deirdre Zander-FoxEmail author
  • Kara S. Cashman
  • Michelle Lane
Gamete Biology

Abstract

Purpose

Embryos generated from oocytes which have been vitrified have lower blastocyst development rates than embryos generated from fresh oocytes. This is indicative of a level of irreversible damage to the oocyte possibly due to exposure to high cryoprotectant levels and osmotic stress. This study aimed to assess the effects of vitrification on the mitochondria of mature mouse oocytes while also examining the ability of the osmolyte glycine, to maintain cell function after vitrification.

Methods

Oocytes were cryopreserved via vitrification with or without 1 mM Glycine and compared to fresh oocyte controls. Oocytes were assessed for mitochondrial distribution and membrane potential as well as their ability to fertilise. Blastocyst development and gene expression was also examined.

Results

Vitrification altered mitochondrial distribution and membrane potential, which did not recover after 2 h of culture. Addition of 1 mM glycine to the vitrification media prevented these perturbations. Furthermore, blastocyst development from oocytes that were vitrified with glycine was significantly higher compared to those vitrified without glycine (83.9 % vs. 76.5 % respectively; p < 0.05) and blastocysts derived from oocytes that were vitrified without glycine had significantly decreased levels of IGF2 and Glut3 compared to control blastocysts however those derived from oocytes vitrified with glycine had comparable levels of these genes compared to fresh controls.

Conclusion

Addition of 1 mM glycine to the vitrification solutions improved the ability of the oocyte to maintain its mitochondrial physiology and subsequent development and therefore could be considered for routine inclusion in cryopreservation solutions.

Keywords

Glycine Osmotic stress Vitrification Oocyte Mitochondria 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Karen Kind for her assistance with the gene expression experiments, Dr. Jeremy Thompson assistance with experimental design and David Froiland for his assistance with confocal microscopy. The authors acknowledge the support of the NHMRC and Channel 7 Children’s Research Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Acton BM, Jurisicova A, Jurisica I, Casper RF. Alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential during preimplantation stages of mouse and human embryo development. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10:23–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agca Y, Liu J, Rutledge JJ, Critser ES, Critser JK. Effect of osmotic stress on the developmental competence of germinal vesicle and metaphase II stage bovine cumulus oocyte complexes and its relevance to cryopreservation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;55:212–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anchamparuthy VM, Pearson RE, Gwazdauskas FC. Expression pattern of apoptotic genes in vitrified-thawed bovine oocytes. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45:e83–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baltz JM. Media composition: salts and osmolality. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;912:61–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baltz JM, Tartia AP. Cell volume regulation in oocytes and early embryos: connecting physiology to successful culture media. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:166–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barnett DK, Bavister BD. What is the relationship between the metabolism of preimplantation embryos and their developmental competence? Mol Reprod Dev. 1996;43:105–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barnett DK, Kimura J, Bavister BD. Translocation of active mitochondria during hamster preimplantation embryo development studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Dev Dyn. 1996;205:64–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barnett DK, Clayton MK, Kimura J, Bavister BD. Glucose and phosphate toxicity in hamster preimplantation embryos involves disruption of cellular organization, including distribution of active mitochondria. Mol Reprod Dev. 1997;48:227–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brevini TA, Vassena R, Francisci C, Gandolfi F. Role of adenosine triphosphate, active mitochondria, and microtubules in the acquisition of developmental competence of parthenogenetically activated pig oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2005;72:1218–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brown KW, Villar AJ, Bickmore W, Clayton-Smith J, Catchpoole D, Maher ER, et al. Imprinting mutation in the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome leads to biallelic IGF2 expression through an H19-independent pathway. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5:2027–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen SU, Lien YR, Chao K, Lu HF, Ho HN, Yang YS. Cryopreservation of mature human oocytes by vitrification with ethylene glycol in straws. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:804–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen C, Han S, Liu W, Wang Y, Huang G. Effect of vitrification on mitochondrial membrane potential in human metaphase II oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chi MM, Hoehn A, Moley KH. Metabolic changes in the glucose-induced apoptotic blastocyst suggest alterations in mitochondrial physiology. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2002;283:E226–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cobo A. Oocyte vitrification: a watershed in ART. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:600–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cobo A, Diaz C. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2011;96:277–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Perez S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1657–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cummins JM. The role of mitochondria in the establishment of oocyte functional competence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;115 Suppl 1:S23–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dawson KM, Baltz JM. Organic osmolytes and embryos: substrates of the Gly and beta transport systems protect mouse zygotes against the effects of raised osmolarity. Biol Reprod. 1997;56:1550–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dawson KM, Collins JL, Baltz JM. Osmolarity-dependent glycine accumulation indicates a role for glycine as an organic osmolyte in early preimplantation mouse embryos. Biol Reprod. 1998;59:225–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    DeChiara TM, Efstratiadis A, Robertson EJ. A growth-deficiency phenotype in heterozygous mice carrying an insulin-like growth factor II gene disrupted by targeting. Nature. 1990;345:78–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eroglu A, Toth TL, Toner M. Alterations of the cytoskeleton and polyploidy induced by cryopreservation of metaphase II mouse oocytes. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:944–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Forman EJ, Li X, Ferry KM, Scott K, Treff NR, Scott Jr RT. Oocyte vitrification does not increase the risk of embryonic aneuploidy or diminish the implantation potential of blastocysts created after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel, paired randomized controlled trial using DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:644–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gardner DK, Lane MW, Lane M. EDTA stimulates cleavage stage bovine embryo development in culture but inhibits blastocyst development and differentiation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;57:256–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gardner DK, Lane M, Watson AJ, editors. A laboratory guide to the mammalian embryo. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gualtieri R, Mollo V, Barbato V, Fiorentino I, Iaccarino M, Talevi R. Ultrastructure and intracellular calcium response during activation in vitrified and slow-frozen human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:2452–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Heggeness MH, Simon M, Singer SJ. Association of mitochondria with microtubules in cultured cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75:3863–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Isachenko V, Alabart JL, Nawroth F, Isachenko E, Vajta G, Folch J. The open pulled straw vitrification of ovine GV-oocytes: positive effect of rapid cooling or rapid thawing or both? Cryo Letters. 2001;22:157–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jones A, Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Toledo AA. Cryopreservation of metaphase II human oocytes effects mitochondrial membrane potential: implications for developmental competence. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1861–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kuleshova LL, Lopata A. Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:449–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti A, Trounson A. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:3077–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lane M, Gardner DK. Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids. J Reprod Fertil. 1997;109:153–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lane M, Gardner DK. Vitrification of mouse oocytes using a nylon loop. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001;58:342–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lane MW, Ahern TJ, Lewis IM, Gardner DK, Peura TT. Cryopreservation and direct transfer of in vitro produced bovine embryos: a comparison between vitrification and slow-freezing. Theriogenology. 1998;49:170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lane M, Bavister BD, Lyons EA, Forest KT. Containerless vitrification of mammalian oocytes and embryos. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:1234–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leese HJ, Conaghan J, Martin KL, Hardy K. Early human embryo metabolism. Bioessays. 1993;15:259–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li JJ, Pei Y, Zhou GB, Suo L, Wang YP, Wu GQ, et al. Histone deacetyltransferase1 expression in mouse oocyte and their in vitro-fertilized embryo: effect of oocyte vitrification. Cryo Letters. 2011;32:13–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lucena E, Bernal DP, Lucena C, Rojas A, Moran A, Lucena A. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:108–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Manipalviratn S, Tong ZB, Stegmann B, Widra E, Carter J, DeCherney A. Effect of vitrification and thawing on human oocyte ATP concentration. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1839–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mavrides A, Morroll D. Cryopreservation of bovine oocytes: is cryoloop vitrification the future to preserving the female gamete? Reprod Nutr Dev. 2002;42:73–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mitchell M, Schulz SL, Armstrong DT, Lane M. Metabolic and mitochondrial dysfunction in early mouse embryos following maternal dietary protein intervention. Biol Reprod. 2009;80:622–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Monzo C, Haouzi D, Roman K, Assou S, Dechaud H, Hamamah S. Slow freezing and vitrification differentially modify the gene expression profile of human metaphase II oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2160–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mullen SF, Agca Y, Broermann DC, Jenkins CL, Johnson CA, Critser JK. The effect of osmotic stress on the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes, and the relevance to cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1148–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Needleman DJ, Ojeda-Lopez MA, Raviv U, Ewert K, Jones JB, Miller HP, et al. Synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of microtubules buckling and bundling under osmotic stress: a probe of interprotofilament interactions. Phys Rev Lett. 2004;93:198104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    NIH Guide. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Bethesda: Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR) of the National Academy of Science; 1996.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pantaleon M, Harvey MB, Pascoe WS, James DE, Kaye PL. Glucose transporter GLUT3: ontogeny, targeting, and role in the mouse blastocyst. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:3795–800.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pickering SJ, Johnson MH. The influence of cooling on the organization of the meiotic spindle of the mouse oocyte. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:207–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pickering SJ, Braude PR, Johnson MH, Cant A, Currie J. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:102–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Porcu E. Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques laboratory and clinical perspectives. In: Gardner D, Weissman A, Howles C, Shoham Z, editors. Oocyte cryopreservation. United Kingdom: Martin Dunitz Ltd; 2001. p. 233–42.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Quintans CJ, Donaldson MJ, Bertolino MV, Pasqualini RS. Birth of two babies using oocytes that were cryopreserved in a choline-based freezing medium. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3149–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rall WF, Fahy GM. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at −196 degrees C by vitrification. Nature. 1985;313:573–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reers M, Smith TW, Chen LB. J-aggregate formation of a carbocyanine as a quantitative fluorescent indicator of membrane potential. Biochemistry. 1991;30:4480–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Vajta G, Trounson AO. Effective cryopreservation of human embryonic stem cells by the open pulled straw vitrification method. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2187–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rho GJ, Kim S, Yoo JG, Balasubramanian S, Lee HJ, Choe SY. Microtubulin configuration and mitochondrial distribution after ultra-rapid cooling of bovine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;63:464–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Richards T, Wang F, Liu L, Baltz JM. Rescue of postcompaction-stage mouse embryo development from hypertonicity by amino acid transporter substrates that may function as organic osmolytes. Biol Reprod. 2010;82:769–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rienzi L, Romano S, Albricci L, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Baroni E, et al. Embryo development of fresh ’versus‘ vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:66–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Rubi B, del Arco A, Bartley C, Satrustegui J, Maechler P. The malate-aspartate NADH shuttle member Aralar1 determines glucose metabolic fate, mitochondrial activity, and insulin secretion in beta cells. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:55659–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Saheki T, Kobayashi K, et al. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of citrin (a mitochondrial aspartate glutamate carrier) deficiency. Metab Brain Dis. 2002;17:335–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Selman H, Angelini A, Barnocchi N, Brusco GF, Pacchiarotti A, Aragona C. Ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of human oocytes using a combined solution of ethylene glycol and dimethyl sulfoxide. Fertil Steril 2006.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Stachecki JJ, Cohen J, Willadsen S. Detrimental effects of sodium during mouse oocyte cryopreservation. Biol Reprod. 1998;59:395–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Stachecki JJ, Cohen J, Willadsen SM. Cryopreservation of unfertilized mouse oocytes: the effect of replacing sodium with choline in the freezing medium. Cryobiology. 1998;37:346–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stachecki JJ, Cohen J, Schimmel T, Willadsen SM. Fetal development of mouse oocytes and zygotes cryopreserved in a nonconventional freezing medium. Cryobiology. 2002;44:5–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Steeves CL, Hammer MA, Walker GB, Rae D, Stewart NA, Baltz JM. The glycine neurotransmitter transporter GLYT1 is an organic osmolyte transporter regulating cell volume in cleavage-stage embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:13982–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Vajta G, Nagy ZP. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:779–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Van Blerkom J. Mitochondria in human oogenesis and preimplantation embryogenesis: engines of metabolism, ionic regulation and developmental competence. Reproduction. 2004;128:269–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Van Blerkom J, Davis P. High-polarized (Delta Psi m(HIGH)) mitochondria are spatially polarized in human oocytes and early embryos in stable subplasmalemmal domains: developmental significance and the concept of vanguard mitochondria. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:246–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Mathwig V, Alexander S. Domains of high-polarized and low-polarized mitochondria may occur in mouse and human oocytes and early embryos. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:393–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Van Blerkom J, Davis P, Alexander S. Inner mitochondrial membrane potential (DeltaPsim), cytoplasmic ATP content and free Ca2+ levels in metaphase II mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:2429–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Van Winkle LJ, Haghighat N, Campione AL. Glycine protects preimplantation mouse conceptuses from a detrimental effect on development of the inorganic ions in oviductal fluid. J Exp Zool. 1990;253:215–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Vanhoutte L, Cortvrindt R, Nogueira D, Smitz J. Effects of chilling on structural aspects of early preantral mouse follicles. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:1041–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yan J, Suzuki J, Yu X, Kan FW, Qiao J, Chian RC. Cryo-survival, fertilization and early embryonic development of vitrified oocytes derived from mice of different reproductive age. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010;27:605–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Yoon TK, Kim TJ, Park SE, Hong SW, Ko JJ, Chung HM, et al. Live births after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1323–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zander DL, Thompson JG, Lane M. Perturbations in mouse embryo development and viability caused by ammonium are more severe after exposure at the cleavage stages. Biol Reprod. 2006;74:288–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zhao XM, Du WH, Wang D, Hao HS, Liu Y, Qin T, et al. Recovery of mitochondrial function and endogenous antioxidant systems in vitrified bovine oocytes during extended in vitro culture. Mol Reprod Dev. 2011;78:942–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deirdre Zander-Fox
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Kara S. Cashman
    • 1
  • Michelle Lane
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Centre for Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics and GynaecologyUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.RepromedDulwichAustralia
  3. 3.Department of R&DRepromedDulwichAustralia

Personalised recommendations