Advertisement

Effect of culture medium volume and embryo density on early mouse embryonic development: Tracking the development of the individual embryo

  • Shan-Jun Dai
  • Chang-Long Xu
  • Jeffrey Wang
  • Ying-Pu Sun
  • Ri-Cheng Chian
Embryo Biology

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the optimal volume or density of embryos for the well-of-the-well (WOW) system in order to track the development of individual embryos and to determine whether the WOW system can reverse the negative impact of culturing embryos singly.

Methods

(1) Mouse embryos (groups of nine at the 2-cell stage) were cultured in 6.25 μl, 12.50 μl, 25.00 μl and 50.00 μl of droplets of culture medium under paraffin oil; (2) Groups of three, six, nine and twelve embryos at the 2-cell stage were cultured in 50 μl of droplet of culture medium under paraffin oil; (3) Groups of nine embryos at the 2-cell stage were cultured in 50 μl of droplet under paraffin oil with or without nine micro-wells made on the bottom of the Petri dish into each of which were placed one of the nine embryos (WOW system). Also single 2-cell stage embryos was cultured individually in 5.5 μl of droplet of culture medium under paraffin oil with or without a single micro-well made on the bottom of the Petri dish (WOW system for single culture). At the end of culture, the percentages of blastocyst development, hatching and hatched blastocysts were compared in each group. The blastocysts were fixed for differential staining.

Results

The blastocyst development was significantly higher (P < 0.05) when nine embryos were cultured in 50 μl of droplet of culture medium compared with other volumes. The blastocyst development was significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in single embryo culture compared to group embryo culture with or without the WOW system. The blastocyst development was not improved when single embryo cultured individually in a micro-well was compared to single embryo cultured individually without micro-well. The total cell numbers of blastocysts were significantly higher in group embryo culture than single embryo culture regardless of whether the WOW system was used. In addition, the total cell numbers of blastocysts were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in single embryo culture with the WOW system than without.

Conclusions

Group embryo culture is superior to single embryo culture for blastocyst development. The WOW system with 50 μl of droplet of culture medium can be used to track the individual development of embryo cultured in groups while preserving good embryonic development. The reduced embryonic development with single embryo culture cannot be ameliorated by the WOW system.

Keywords

Zygote Embryo Micro-well culture system Blastocyst Development 

Notes

Declaration of Interest

There is no conflict of interest that could affect the impartiality of the research reported.

References

  1. 1.
    Paria BC, Dey SK. Preimplantation embryo development in vitro: cooperative interactions among embryos and role of growth factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4756–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Canseco RS, Sparks AE, Pearson RE, Gwazdauskas FC. Embryo density and medium volume effects on early murine embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1992;9:454–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lane M, Gardner DK. Effect of incubation volume and embryo density on the development and viability of mouse embryos in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:558–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kato Y, Tsunoda Y. Effects of the culture density of mouse zygotes on the development in vitro and in vivo. Theriogenology. 1994;41:1315–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keefer CL, Stice SL, Paprocki AM, Golueke P. In vitro culture of bovine IVM-IVF embryos: Cooperative interaction among embryos and the role of growth factors. Theriogenology. 1994;41:1323–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stoddart NR, Wild AE, Fleming TP. Stimulation of development in vitro by platelet-activating factor receptor ligands released by mouse preimplantation embryos. J Reprod Fertil. 1996;108:47–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Neill C. Evidence for the requirement of autocrine growth factors for development of mouse preimplantation embryos in vitro. Biol Reprod. 1997;56:229–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vajta G, Peura TT, Holm P, et al. New method for culture of zona-included or zona-free embryos: the Well of the Well (WOW) system. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;55:256–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hardy K, Spanos S. Growth factor expression and function in the human and mouse preimplantation embryo. J Endocrinol. 2002;172:221–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fujita T, Umeki H, Shimura H, et al. Effect of group culture and embryo-culture conditioned medium on development of bovine embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2006;52:137–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salahuddin S, Ookutsu S, Goto K, et al. Effects of embryo density and co-culture of unfertilized oocytes on embryonic development of in-vitro fertilized mouse embryos. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2382–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bormann JM, Totir LR, Kachman SD, et al. Pregnancy rate and first-service conception rate in Angus heifers. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:2022–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katz-Jaffe MG, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. Analysis of protein expression (secretome) by human and mouse preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:678–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richter KS. The importance of growth factors for preimplantation embryo development and in-vitro culture. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20:292–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vutyavanich T, Saeng-Anan U, Sirisukkasem S, Piromlertamorn W. Effect of embryo density and microdrop volume on the blastocyst development of mouse two-cell embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1435–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vajta G, Korosi T, Du Y, et al. The Well-of-the-Well system: an efficient approach to improve embryo development. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:73–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tagawa M, Matoba S, Narita M, et al. Production of monozygotic twin calves using the blastomere separation technique and Well of the Well culture system. Theriogenology. 2008;69:574–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoelker M, Rings F, Lund Q, et al. Effect of embryo density on in vitro developmental characteristics of bovine preimplantative embryos with respect to micro and macroenvironments. Reprod Domest Anim. 2010;45:e138–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sugimura S, Akai T, Somfai T, et al. Time-lapse cinematography-compatible polystyrene-based microwell culture system: a novel tool for tracking the development of individual bovine embryos. Biol Reprod. 2010;83:970–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Quinn P. Enhanced results in mouse and human embryo culture using a modified human tubal fluid medium lacking glucose and phosphate. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:97–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang Y, Ock SA, Chian RC. Effect of gonadotrophin stimulation on mouse oocyte quality and subsequent embryonic development in vitro. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:304–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wiley LM, Yamami S, Van Muyden D. Effect of potassium concentration, type of protein supplement, and embryo density on mouse preimplantation development in vitro. Fertil Steril. 1986;45:111–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O’Doherty EM, Wade MG, Hill JL, Boland MP. Effects of culturing bovine oocytes either singly or in groups on development to blastocysts. Theriogenology. 1997;48:161–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Larson MA, Kubisch HM. The effects of group size on development and interferon-tau secretion by in-vitro fertilized and cultured bovine blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2075–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sananmuang T, Tharasanit T, Nguyen C, et al. Culture medium and embryo density influence on developmental competence and gene expression of cat embryos. Theriogenology. 2011;75:1708–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Katz-Jaffe MG, McCallie BR, Preis KA, et al. Transcriptome analysis of in vivo and in vitro matured bovine MII oocytes. Theriogenology. 2009;71:939–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Donnay I, Van Langendonckt A, Auquier P, et al. Effects of co-culture and embryo number on the in vitro development of bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 1997;47:1549–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gil MA, Abeydeera LR, Day BN, et al. Effect of the volume of medium and number of oocytes during in vitro fertilization on embryo development in pigs. Theriogenology. 2003;60:767–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    de Oliveira AT, Lopes RF, Rodrigues JL. Gene expression and developmental competence of bovine embryos produced in vitro under varying embryo density conditions. Theriogenology. 2005;64:1559–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gardner DK, Lane M. Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture. Biol Reprod. 1993;48:377–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Malekshah AK, Moghaddam AE. Follicular fluid and cumulus cells synergistically improve mouse early embryo development in vitro. J Reprod Dev. 2005;51:195–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sinclair KD, Dunne LD, Maxfield EK, et al. Fetal growth and development following temporary exposure of day 3 ovine embryos to an advanced uterine environment. Reprod Fertil Dev. 1998;10:263–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson MH, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Radical solutions and cultural problems: could free oxygen radicals be responsible for the impaired development of preimplantation mammalian embryos in vitro? Bioessays. 1994;16:31–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wood SA, Pascoe WS, Schmidt C, et al. Simple and efficient production of embryonic stem cell-embryo chimeras by coculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:4582–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.The Reproductive Medical CenterThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Royal Victoria HospitalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations