Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 28, Issue 11, pp 1111–1117 | Cite as

Resilience in infertile couples acts as a protective factor against infertility-specific distress and impaired quality of life

  • Darja Herrmann
  • Horst Scherg
  • Rolf Verres
  • Cornelia von Hagens
  • Thomas Strowitzki
  • Tewes WischmannEmail author



Our hypothesis was that resilience (=psychosocial stress-resistance) reduces infertility-specific distress and maintains quality of life of infertile couples.


Questionnaire data of WHO Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL; domains: ‘physical’, ‘psychological’, ‘social relationships’ and ‘environment’), Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI; scales: ‘social concern’, ‘sexual concern’, ‘relationship concern’, ‘rejection of childfree lifestyle’ and ‘need for parenthood’), Resilience Scale (RS), as well as sociographic and medical data were available for 199 infertile couples.


Age, medical diagnosis and ‘intensity of desire for a child’ had no influence on quality of life. High scores on ‘suffering from childlessness’ went along with less satisfaction on ‘physical’ and ‘psychological’ domains for the women only. For both partners, high scores on ‘suffering from childlessness’ went along with higher scores on all FPI scales. High resilience was associated with high scores on all WHOQOL domains for both partners, also with low scores on all FPI scales except for ‘need for parenthood’ for the women and with a low score only on ’relationship concern’ for the men.


For infertile couples, resilience can be considered as an unspecific protective factor against infertility-specific distress and impaired quality of life. When offering counselling to involuntarily childless couples, awareness should be raised for resilience as a couple’s resource and a “generic” factor of coping.


Psychological factors Infertility-specific distress Resilience Quality of life Infertility Protective factor 



The authors thank Christopher R. Newton for his support and for the authorisation of the German version of the FPI.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.


  1. 1.
    Menning BE. The emotional needs of infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 1980;34:313–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Henning K, Strauß B. Psychological and psychosomatic aspects of involuntary childlessness: State of research at the end of the 1990s. In: Strauß B, editor. Involuntary childlessness. Psychological assessment, counselling and psychotherapy. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber; 2002. p. 3–18.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burns LH, Covington SH. Psychology of infertility. In: Covington SH, Burns LH, editors. Infertility counseling a comprehensive handbook for clinicans. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Greil AL, Slauson-Blevins K, McQuillan J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociol Health Illness. 2010;32(1):140–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dunkel-Schetter C, Lobel M. Psychological reaction to infertility. In: Stanton A, Dunkel-Schetter C, editors. Infertility. Perspectives from stress and coping research. New York: Plenum Press; 1991. p. 29–57.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lalos A. Breaking bad news concerning fertility. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:581–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Domar AD, Zuttermeister P, Friedman R. The psychological impact of infertility: a comparison with patients with other medical conditions. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;14(Suppl):45–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;21:293–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verhaak CM, Smeenk JMJ, Evers AWM, Kremer JAM, Kraaimaat FW, Braat DDM. Women’s emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(1):27–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wischmann T, Stammer H, Gerhard I, Verres R. Couple counseling and therapy for the unfulfilled desire for a child—The two-step approach of the “Heidelberg infertility consultation service”. In: Strauß B, editor. Involuntarily childlessness—Psychological assessment, counseling and psychotherapy. Seattle: Hogrefe International; 2002. p. 127–49.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Covington SH, Burns LH, editors. Infertility counseling. A comprehensive handbook for clinicians. 2nd ed. Cambridge London New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van den Broeck U, Emery M, Wischmann T, Thorn P. Counselling in infertility: individual, couple and group interventions. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;81(3):422–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boivin J, Kentenich H, editors. Guidelines for counselling in infertility. ESHRE monographs. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson K, Sharpe M, Rattray A, Irvine DS. Distress and concerns in couples referred to a specialist infertility clinic. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54:353–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boivin J, Scanlan LC, Walker SM. Why are infertile patients not using psychosocial counselling? Hum Reprod. 1999;5:1384–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wagnild GM, Young HM. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale. J Nurs Meas. 1993;1:165–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Dev. 2000;71(3):543–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rutter M. Resilience reconsidered: conceptual considerations, empirical findings, and policy implications. In: Shonkoff JP, Meisels SJ, editors. Handbook of early childhood intervention. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000. p. 651–82.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ridenour A, Yorgason J, Peterson B. The infertility resilience model: assessing individual, couple, and external predictive factors. Contemp Fam Ther. 2009;31:34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    The WHOQOL-Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-Bref quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28:551–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Angermeyer MC, Kilian R, Matschinger H. World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Newton CR, Sherrard W, Glavac I. The Fertility Problem Inventory: measuring perceived infertility-related stress. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:54–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leppert K. RS—Resilienzskala. In: Brähler E, Schumacher J, Strauß B, editors. Diagnostische Verfahren in der Psychotherapie. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2002. p. 295–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schumacher J, Leppert K, Gunzelmann T, Strauß B, Brähler E. Die Resilienzskala—Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der psychischen Widerstandsfähigkeit als Personmerkmal. Z Klin Psychol Psychiatr Psychother. 2005;53:16–39.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale New York: Erlbaum; 1988.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland (2003) www. destatis de.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Greil AL, Leitko TA, Porter KL. Infertility: his and hers. Gend Soc. 1988;2:172–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Greil AL. Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1997;11:1679–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wischmann T, Stammer H, Scherg H, Gerhard I, Verres R. Psychological characteristics of infertile couples: a study by the “Heidelberg Fertility Consultation Service”. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1753–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wright J, Duchesne C, Sabourin S, Bissonnette F, Benoit J, Girard Y. Psychosocial distress and infertility: men and women respond differently. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:100–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Greil AL, McQuillan. Help-seeking patterns among subfecund women. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2004;22(4):305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Newton CR, Hearn MT, Yuzpe AA. Psychological assessment and follow-up after in vitro fertilization: assessing the impact of failure. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:879–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gibson DM, Myers JE. The effect of social coping resources and growth-fostering relationships on infertility stress in women. J Mental Health Counsel. 2002;24:68–80.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wischmann T. Psychogenic infertility—myths and facts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:485–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sankila R, Heinavaara S, Hakulinen T. Survival of breast cancer patients after subsequent term pregnancy: “Healthy mother effect”. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:818–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Berg BJ. A researcher’s guide to investigating the psychological sequelae of infertility: methodical consideration. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 1994;15:147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Richardson GE, Waite PJ. Mental health promotion through resilience and resiliency education. Int J Emerg Mental Health. 2002;4:65–75.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Verhaak CM, Lintsen AME, Evers AWM, Braat DDM. Who is at risk of emotional problems and how do you know? Screening of women going for IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1234–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A. The Fertility Quality of Life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Fertil Steril 2011; In Press, Corrected Proof.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darja Herrmann
    • 1
  • Horst Scherg
    • 1
  • Rolf Verres
    • 1
  • Cornelia von Hagens
    • 2
  • Thomas Strowitzki
    • 2
  • Tewes Wischmann
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Medical Psychology, Centre for Psychosocial MedicineUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Women’s HospitalUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations