Frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: clinical outcomes of single and double blastocyst transfers

  • Inna Berin
  • Sarah T. McLellan
  • Eric A. Macklin
  • Thomas L. Toth
  • Diane L. Wright
Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles when one or two blastocysts are transferred.

Methods

Retrospective chart review

Results

Two hundred forty-three frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles were analyzed. Clinical pregnancy rate (50.4% vs. 34.7%), live birth rate (45.8% vs. 30.6%), and twin live birth rate (19.3% vs. 0) were significantly higher in the double versus single FBT group, respectively (p < 0.05). Prior fresh cycle success with same-cohort embryos did not predict outcome of FBT cycle. When the fresh cycle was unsuccessful, there still was a significant increase in twinning when two frozen-thawed blastocysts were transferred.

Conclusions

Transferring two blastocysts during an FBT cycle resulted in higher live birth and twin live birth rates. Single FBT provided acceptable pregnancy rates for couples seeking to avoid a multiple pregnancy or for those having a single blastocyst stored. Interestingly, the outcome of fresh cycle with same-cohort embryos did not influence the outcome of frozen-thawed cycle.

Keywords

Frozen blastocyst transfer Frozen cycle outcome IVF Multiple pregnancy Number of embryos to transfer 

References

  1. 1.
    Mangalraj AM, Muthukumar K, Aleyamma T, Kamath MS, George K. Blastocyst stage transfer vs cleavage stage embryo transfer. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2009;2:23–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reh A, Fino E, Krey L, Berkeley A, Noyes N, Grifo J. Optimizing embryo selection with day 5 transfer. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:609–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjo T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Styer AK, Wright DL, Wolkovich AM, Veiga C, Toth TL. Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1702–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bergh T, Ericson A, Hillensjo T, Nygren KG, Wennerholm UB. Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982–95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;354:1579–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kolibianakis EM, Zikopoulos K, Devroey P. Implantation potential and clinical impact of cryopreservation—a review. Placenta. 2003;24(Suppl B):S27–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berin I, Engmann LL, Benadiva CA, Schmidt DW, Nulsen JC, Maier DB. Transfer of two versus three embryos in women less than 40 years old undergoing frozen transfer cycles. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:355–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Desai N, Goldfarb J. Examination of frozen cycles with replacement of a single thawed blastocyst. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:349–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hyden-Granskog C, Unkila-Kallio L, Halttunen M, Tiitinen A. Single embryo transfer is an option in frozen embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2935–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Motoyama H, Ohara M, Kawamura T. Clinical outcome of frozen blastocyst transfer: single vs. double transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25:531–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1518–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veeck L, Saninovic N. Human blastocysts in vitro. In: The encyclopedia of visual medicine series: an atlas of human blastocysts. New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group; 2003, p. 118.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shu Y, Watt J, Gebhardt J, Dasig J, Appling J, Behr B. The value of fast blastocoele re-expansion in the selection of a viable thawed blastocyst for transfer. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:401–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang JX, Yap YY, Matthews CD. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: influence of clinical factors on implantation rate and risk of multiple conception. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2316–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    El-Toukhy T, Khalaf Y, Al-Darazi K, O’Mahony F, Wharf E, Taylor A, et al. Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:1313–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. Blastocyst culture and transfer increases the efficiency of oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:482–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1139–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang R, Catt J, Howlett D. Towards defining parameters for a successful single embryo transfer in frozen cycles. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1179–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salumets A, Suikkari AM, Makinen S, Karro H, Roos A, Tuuri T. Frozen embryo transfers: implications of clinical and embryological factors on the pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2368–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thum MY, Kalu E, Abdalla H. Elevated basal FSH and embryo quality: lessons from extended culture embryos: raised FSH and blastocyst quality. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26:313–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inna Berin
    • 1
  • Sarah T. McLellan
    • 1
  • Eric A. Macklin
    • 2
  • Thomas L. Toth
    • 1
  • Diane L. Wright
    • 1
  1. 1.Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology Service, Division of Reproductive Medicine and IVFMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  2. 2.Biostatistics CenterMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations