Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 369–374

Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes

Cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer
  • Eun Mi Chang
  • Ji Eun Han
  • You Shin Kim
  • Sang Woo Lyu
  • Woo Sik Lee
  • Tae Ki Yoon
Assisted Reproduction Technologies



To compare the IVF outcomes of vitrification-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles utilizing different endometrial preparation methods.


We retrospectively assessed IVF outcomes in 611 patients (648 cycles) who underwent blastocyst frozen embryo transfer (FET) between January 2007 and December 2009. All embryos had been cryopreserved by a vitrification method following a previous IVF cycle. Patients were prepared for transfer by using either the natural cycle (n = 310/Group 1), the natural cycle with ovulation induction employing human chorionic gonadotropin (n = 134/Group 2), or a hormonally manipulated artificial cycle with estrogen and progesterone supplementation (n = 204/Group 3).


Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate between Groups 3 (30.4%) and 1 (41.9%) (odds ratio [OR], 0.567; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.379–0.847, P = 0.006) whereas the difference between Groups 2 and 1 was not significant (41.8% vs. 41.9%; OR, 0.683; 95% CI, 0.435–1.073; P = 0.098). Other significant variables affecting clinical pregnancy rate were the number of embryos transferred, the grade of transferred embryos, and maximal endometrial thickness.


The results showed that, using vitrification-thawed blastocyst transfer, employment of natural cycles with or without hCG treatment was associated with better outcomes than was the use of hormonally manipulated cycles.


Cycle regimen Vitrification Embryo transfer Blastocyst In vitro fertilization 


  1. 1.
    Hong S, Kim T, Lee S, Choi D, Cha K. Cryopreserved blastocysts using vitrification protocol give excellent pregnancy and implantation rates after thawing. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:S178–S9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuleshova LL, Lopata A. Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:449–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Youssry M, Ozmen B, Zohni K, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S. Current aspects of blastocyst cryopreservation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16:311–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fahy GM, MacFarlane DR, Angell CA, Meryman HT. Vitrification as an approach to cryopreservation. Cryobiology. 1984;21:407–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ghobara T, Vandekerckhove P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD003414.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1155–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morozov V, Ruman J, Kenigsberg D, Moodie G, Brenner S. Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:119–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kassab A, Sabatini L, Tozer A, Zosmer A, Mostafa M, Al-Shawaf T. The correlation between basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels before embryo cryopreservation and the clinical outcome of frozen embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1269–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loh SK, Leong NK. Factors affecting success in an embryo cryopreservation programme. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1999;28:260–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sterzik K, Grab D, Schneider V, Strehler EJ, Gagsteiger F, Rosenbusch BE. Lack of correlation between ultrasonography and histologic staging of the endometrium in in vitro fertilization patients. Ultrtasound Med Bio. 1997;23:165–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takeuchi H, Itoh S, Fukuda M, Yoshida K, Ishi K, Takuchi H, et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonographic appearance and endometrial histology. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1991;44:537–44.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ma W, Song H, Das SK, Paria BC, Dey SK. Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2963–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen Q, Sun X, Li L, Gao X, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Cheng L. Effects of ovarian stimulation on endometrial integrin beta3 and leukemia inhibitory factor expression in the peri-implantation phase. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1357–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Anderson FD, Hait H, Hsiu J, Thompson-Graves AL, Wilborn WH, Williams RF. Endometrial microstructure after long-term use of a 91-day extended-cycle oral contraceptive regimen. Contraception. 2005;71:55–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Creus M, Ordi J, Fbregues F, Casamitjana R, Carmona F, Cardesa A, et al. The effect of different hormone therapies on integrin expression and pinopode formation in the human endometrium: a controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:683–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu Y, Lee K, Ng EH, Yeung WS, Ho P. Gene expression profiling of human peri-implantation endometria between natural and stimulated cycles. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:2152–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fatemi HM, Kyrou D, Bourgain C, Van den Abbeel E, Griesinger G, Devroey P. Cryopreserved-thawed human embryo transfer: spontaneous natural cycle is superior to human chorionic gonadotropin-induced natural cycle. Fertil Steril. In Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weissman A, Levin D, Ravhon A, Eran H, Golan A, Levran D. What is the preferred method for timing natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer? Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19:66–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ghobara T, Vandekerckhove P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;23:CD003414.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eun Mi Chang
    • 1
  • Ji Eun Han
    • 1
  • You Shin Kim
    • 1
  • Sang Woo Lyu
    • 1
  • Woo Sik Lee
    • 1
  • Tae Ki Yoon
    • 1
  1. 1.Fertility Center of CHA General Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of MedicinePochon CHA UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations