Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 73–76 | Cite as

Successful live birth from vitrified oocytes after 5 years of cryopreservation

  • Thomas J. Kim
  • Seung Wook HongEmail author
Assisted Reproduction

Abstract

Objective

To report a birth of a healthy boy after long-term cryopreservation of oocytes by vitrification.

Design

Clinical application.

Setting

IVF Center.

Patient

A 17 year-old female with secondary pulmonary hypertension caused by transposition of great vessels visited our center in 2002, and she wished oocytes cryopreservation to avoid possible sterility after the following category X medication treatment.

Intervention(s)

Vitrified oocytes on Electron Microscope (EM) grids were warmed after 5 years of storage. Surviving MII oocytes were microinjected for fertilization and two embryos were transferred into a gestational carrier day 5 after microinjection.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Survival, fertilization, cleavage, clinical pregnancy and delivery.

Result(s)

Eleven out of fourteen oocytes (78.6%) survived warming. Eight Metaphase II (MII) oocytes and 3 in vitro matured oocytes were microinjected; all 11 oocytes (100%) fertilized and 2 embryos were transferred on day 5. A healthy baby boy weighing 3,600 g was delivered at 38 weeks of gestation. Live-birth rates per warmed oocyte and per injected oocyte were 7.1% and 9.1% respectively.

Conclusion(s)

Cryopreservation after vitrification with EM grids maintained the developmental competence of oocytes after long-term storage and resulted in a successful live birth.

Keywords

Human oocyte cryopreservation Vitrification Electron microscope grid Ethylene glycol Clinical outcome 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Professor Rogerio Lobo, M.D. (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY) for his valuable suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet. 1986;1:884–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hong SW, Chung HM, Lim JM, Ko JJ, Yoon TK, Yee B, et al. Improved human oocyte development after vitrification: a comparison of thawing methods. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:142–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti A, Trounson A. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human ocoytes: case report. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:3077–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chung HM, Hong SW, Lim JM, Lee SH, Cha WT, Ko JJ, et al. In vitro blastocyst formation of human oocytes obtained from unstimulated and stimulated cycles after vitrification at various maturational stages. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:545–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoon TK, Kim TJ, Park SE, Hong SW, Ko JJ, Chung HM, et al. Live births after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1323–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoon TK, Lee DR, Cha SK, Chung HM, Lee WS, Cha KY. Survival rate of human oocytes and pregnancy outcome after vitrification using slush nitrogen in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:952–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:300–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kyono K, Fuchinoue K, Yagi A, Nakajo Y, Yamashita A, Kumagai S. Successful pregnancy and delivery after transfer of a single balstocyst derived from a vitrified mature human oocyte. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lucena E, Bernal DP, Lucena C, Rojas A, Moran A, Lucena A. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:108–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vajta G, Nagy ZP. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:779–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Camus A, Clairaz P, Ersham A, Van Kappel AL, Savic G. Staub C [The comparison of the process of five different vitrification devices]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2006;34:737–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Selman H, Angelini A, Barnocchi N, Brusco GF, Pacchiarotti A, Aragona C. Ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of human oocytes using a combined solution of ethylene glycol and dimethyl sulfoxide. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:997–1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, Antinori S. Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14:72–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang D, Brown SE, Nguyen K, Reddy V, Brubaker C, Winslow K. Live birth after the transfer of human embryos developed from cryopreserved oocytes harvested before cancer treatment. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(1469):e1–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fabbri R, Porcu E, Marsella T, Rocchetta G, Venturoli S, Flamigni C. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival. Human Reprod. 2001;16:411–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Borini A, Sciajno R, Bianchi V, Sereni E, Flamigni C, Coticchio G. Clinical outcome of oocyte cryopreservation after slow cooling with a protocol utilizing a high sucrose concentration. Human Reprod. 2006;21:512–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chian RC, Huang JYH, Tan SL, Lucena E, Saa A, Rojas A, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants conceived from vitrified oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16:608–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borini A, Cattoli M, Mazzone S, Trevisi MR, Nalon M, Iadorola I. Survey of 105 babies born after slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation [abstract]. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:S13–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cobo A, Domingo J, Perez S, Crespo J, Renohi J, Rellicer A. Vitrification: an effective new approach to oocyte banking and preserving fertility in cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2008;10(5):268–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim TJ, Laufer LR, Hong SW. Vitrification of oocytes produces high pregnancy rates when carried out in fertile women. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:467–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rama Raju GA, Jaya Prakash G, Murali Krishna K, Madan K. Neonatal outcome after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:143–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Desai N, Abdelhafez F, Bedaiwy MA, Goldberg J, Falcone T, Goldfarb J. Clinical pregnancy and live births after transfer of embryos vitrified on day 3. Reprod Biomed Onlin. 2010;20:808–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hong SW, Sepilian V, Chung HM, Kim TJ. Cryopreserved human blastocysts after vitrification result in excellent implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:2062–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grifo JA, Noyes N. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:391–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Reproductive Medicine Associates of New JerseyMorristownUSA
  2. 2.CHA Fertility CenterLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations