Effects of men and recipients’ age on the reproductive outcome of an oocyte donation program
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of men and recipient age on the reproductive outcome of our oocyte donation program.
We retrospectively analyzed 915 cycles, taking into account men and recipient age, separately and together.
The significant cut off value for men and recipients age with incidence in the reproductive outcome was 39 years. Recipient older than 38 years presented a significantly lower pregnancy and implantation rates than others (44.92 vs. 55.75 ± 1.53%, 25.66 vs. 32.79 ± 1.64%). If men age was older than 38, a significant reduction in pregnancy and implantation rates was observed, too (46.0 vs. 54.65%, 26.00 ± 1.52 vs. 32.43 ± 1.65%). When men and recipient age was analyzed together, a reduction in pregnancy and implantation was detected only if both were older than 38.
Present study suggests that age has a detrimental effect on the reproductive outcome of oocyte donation cycles when both men and recipient are ≥ 39 years old.
KeywordsMen and recipient ageing Oocyte donation Pregnancy and implantation rate
- 5.Budak E, Garrido N, Soares SR, Melo MA, Meseguer M, Pellicer A, et al. Improvements achieved in an oocyte donation program over a 10-year period: sequential increase in implantation and pregnancy rates and decrease in high-order multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:342–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Ford WC, North K, Taylor H, Farrow A, Hull MG, Golding J. Increasing paternal age is associated with delayed conception in a large population of fertile couples: evidence for declining fecundity in older men. The ALSPAC Study Team (Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood). Hum Reprod 2000;15:1703–8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.8.1703.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
- 32.Wyrobek AJ, Eskenazi B, Young S, Arnheim N, Tiemann-Boege I, Jabs EW, Glaser RL, Pearson FS, Evenson D. Advancing age has differential effects on DNA damage, chromatin integrity, gene mutations, and aneuploidies in sperm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9601–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506468103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Larson-Cook KL, Brannian JD, Hansen KA, Kasperson KM, Aamold ET, Evenson DP. Relationship between the outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques and sperm DNA fragmentation as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:895–902. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)01116-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Virro MR, Larson-Cook KL, Evenson DP. Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters are related to fertilization, blastocyst development, and ongoing pregnancy in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1289–95. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.de La Rochebrochard E, de Mouzon J, Thepot F, Thonneau P. French National IVF Registry (FIVNAT) Association: Fathers over 40 and increased failure to conceive: the lessons of in vitro fertilization in France. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:1420–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.11.040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar