Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 24, Issue 9, pp 395–399 | Cite as

Examination of bacterial contamination at the time of embryo transfer, and its impact on the IVF/pregnancy outcome

  • Helmy Selman
  • Monica Mariani
  • Nicoletta Barnocchi
  • Antonella Mencacci
  • Francesco Bistoni
  • Saverio Arena
  • Silvana Pizzasegale
  • Gian Francesco Brusco
  • Antonio Angelini
Assisted Reproduction

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to examine the effect of bacterial contamination on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes.

Method

In a prospective clinical trial, 152 patients aged 23–38 years, mean 33.3 ± 4.6, undergoing IVF treatment were selected for this study. During embryo transfer, separate samples were collected for microbial examination from the following sites: the fundus of the vagina, the cervix, the embryo culture medium prior and post-embryo transfer, the tip of the catheter, and the external sheet. All the samples were separately cultured to identify any bacteria or yeast present.

Results

Pregnancy rates in patients testing positive for Entrobacteriaceae (22.2% versus 51%) and Staphylococcus species (17.6% versus 44%) were significantly lower than those in the negative culture group (p < 0.001). The pregnancy rates do not seem to be affected by the other isolated microorganisms.

Conclusion

This study shows that the presence of vaginal–cervical microbial contamination at the time of embryo transfer is associated with significantly decreased pregnancy rates.

Keywords

Bacterial population Embryo transfer catheter Implantation In vitro fertilization Vaginal–cervical contamination 

References

  1. 1.
    Roseboom TJ, Vermeiden JPW, Schoute E, Lens JW, Schats R. The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Hum Reprod 1995;10:3035–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Munne S, Alikani M, Tomkin G, Grifo J, Cohen J. Embryo morphology, developmental rate, and maternal age are correlated with chromosome abnormalities. Fertil Steril 1995;64:382–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karande VC, Morris R, Chapman C, Rinehart J, Gleicher N. Impact of the “physician factor” on pregnancy rates in a large assisted reproductive technology program: Do too many cooks spoil the broth? Fertil Steril 1999;71:1001–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hearns-Stokes RM, Miller BT, Scott L, Creuss D, Chakraborty PK, Segars JH. Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provider at embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;74:80–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Angelini A, Brusco GF, Barnocchi N, El-Danasouri I, Pacchiarotti A, Selman H. Impact of physician performing embryo transfer on pregnancy rates in an assisted reproductive program. J Assist Reprod Genet 2006;23:329–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Egbase PE, Al-Sharhan M, Al-Othman S, Al-Mutawa M, Udo EE, Grudzinskas JG. Incidence of microbial growth from the tip of embryo transfer catheter after embryo transfer in relation to clinical pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1687–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Egbase PE, Udo EE, Al-Sharhan M, et al. Prophylactic antibiotics and endocervical microbial inoculation of the endometrium at embryo transfer (letter). Lancet 1999;354:651–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fanchin R, Harmas A, Benaoudia F, Lundkvist U, Olivennes F, Frydman R. Microbial flora of the cervix assessed at the time of embryo transfer adversely affects in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1998;70:866–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moore DE, Soules MR, Klein NA, Fujimoto VY, Agnew KJ, Eschenobach DA. Bacteria in the transfer catheter tip influence the live-birth rate after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2000;74:1118–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Westrom L. Effect of acute pelvic inflammatory disease on fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975;121:707–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faro S. Chlamydia trachomatis: female pelvic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:1767–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Witkin SS, Sultan KM, Neal GS, Jeremias J, Grifo JA, Rosenwaks Z. Unsuspected Chlamydia trachomatis infection and in vitro fertilization outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:1208–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Witkin SS, Kligman II, Grifo JA, Rosenwaks Z. Chlamydia trachomatis detected by polymerase chain reaction in cervices of culture-negative women correlates with adverse in vitro fertilization outcome. J Infect Dis 1995;17:1657–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ralph SG, Rutherford AJ, Wilson JD. Influence of bacterial vaginosis on conception and miscarriage in the first trimester: cohort study. BMJ 1999;319:220–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liversedge NH, Turner A, Horner PJ, Keay SD, Jenkins JM, Hull MG. The influence of bacterial vaginosis on in-vitro fertilization and embryo implantation during assisted reproduction treatment. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2411–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tatbibzadeh S, Babaknia A. The signals and molecular pathway involved in implantation: a symbiotic interaction between blastocyst and endometrium involving adhesion and tissue invasion. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1579–602.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Factors affecting embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: a hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:2020–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Navot D, Anderson TL, Drosech K, Scott RT, Kreiner D, Rosenwaks Z. Hormonal manipulation of endometrial maturation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989;68:801–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Czernobilisky B. Endometritis and infertility. Fertil Steril 1978;30:119–30.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Rabe LK, Klebanoff SJ, Eschenbach DA. The normal vaginal flora, H2O2-producing lactobacilli, and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis 1993;16(Suppl 4):S273–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Herath S, Fischer DP, Werling D, Williams EJ, Lilly ST, Dobson H, et al. Expression and function of Toll-like receptor 4 in the endometrial cells of the uterus. Endocrinology 2006;147:562–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmy Selman
    • 1
  • Monica Mariani
    • 1
  • Nicoletta Barnocchi
    • 1
  • Antonella Mencacci
    • 2
  • Francesco Bistoni
    • 2
  • Saverio Arena
    • 1
  • Silvana Pizzasegale
    • 1
  • Gian Francesco Brusco
    • 1
  • Antonio Angelini
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro Sterilità e Fecondazione Assistita Policlinico di PerugiaUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Experimental Medicine and Biochemical Sciences, Microbiology SectionUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations