Discordance among blastomeres renders preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy ineffective
- 70 Downloads
Purpose: To investigate the contribution of discordance among blastomeres from the same embryo in the interpretation of blastomeres biopsied from day 3 embryos.
Methods: 228 IVF embryos had two blastomeres removed and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to detect aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y. Of the 228 embryos, 102 had complete FISH results for both blastomeres.
Results: When the 2 blastomeres of 102 embryos with successful FISH results were compared, 26 (25.5%) were concordant for all 8 chromosomes and 76 (74.5%) were discordant for one or more chromosomes. Among the 102 embryos, 12 (12%) were disomy in both blastomeres and 37 (36%) were disomic in all 8 chromosomes in one of the two blastomeres.
Conclusion: Discordance among blastomeres from the same embryo appears to present a significant problem in interpreting results of embryos biopsied on day 3 and analyzed by FISH especially when most PGD’s are done on single blastomeres.
KeywordsPreimplantation genetic diagnosis Aneuploidy screening Discordance among blastomeres Chromosomal discordance
- 6.Taranissi M, El-Toukhy T, Gorgy A, Verlinsky Y. Influence of maternal age on the outcome of PGD for aneuploidy in patients with recurrent implantation failure. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;4:521–4Google Scholar
- 7.Warburton D, Kline J, Stein Z, Strobino B. Cytogenetic abnormalities in spontaneous abortions of recognized conceptions. In: Porter IH, Wiley A, editors. Perinatal genetics: diagnosis and treatment. New York Academic Press; 1986, p. 133–48Google Scholar
- 13.Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E, Michiels A, Tournaye H, Camus M, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2849–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Ziebe S, Lundin K, Loft A, Bergh C, Nyboe-Andersen A, Skelleskog U, Nielsen D, Grondahl C, Kim H, Acre JC. FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology. Hum Reprod 2003;18:2575–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Munne S, Marquez, Magli C, Morton P, Morrison L. Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21. Hum Mol Genet 1998;4:863–70Google Scholar
- 29.Kalousek DK, Howard-Peebles PN, Magenis RE, Barret IJ, Dorfmann A, Black SH, Schulman JD, Wilson RD. Confirmation of CVS mosaicism in term placentae and high frequency of intrauterine growth retardation associated with confined placental mosaicism. Prenatal Diagnosis 1991;11:743–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Verjalav LO, Mikkelsom M. European collaborative study on mosiacism in chorionic villus sampling: Data from 1986–1987. Prenatal Diagnosis 1989;9:575–88Google Scholar