Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recent Directions and Developments in Geographical Information Systems

  • Published:
Journal of Archaeological Research Aims and scope

Abstract

Geographical information systems (GIS) are tools for handling and processing spatially referenced information that have permeated all facets of archaeology, frequently revolutionizing research by allowing easy access to vast amounts of information, new ways of data visualization that promote insight through pattern recognition, and unique methodologies that allow entirely new approaches to the study of the past. This comprehensive review examines and critiques recent advances achieved through GIS in regional and within-site databases, locational analysis and modeling, regional simulation, studies of landscape perception through intervisibility analysis, and models of spatial allocation, territoriality, and site access. The future prospects of GIS are enormous with the growth of the Internet, the resultant linking of databases, expected enhancements in satellite remote sensing, and the increasing pervasiveness of global positioning systems for spatial data capture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES CITED

  • Aberg, F. A., and Leech, R. H. (1992). The national archaeological record for England: Past, present and future. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldenderfer, M. (1992). The state of GIS and anthropological research. Anthropological Newsletter 3: 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldenderfer, M. (1996). Introduction. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. M. S. (1996). Iroquoian landscapes: People, environments, and the GIS context. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 198–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altschul, J. H. (1990). Red flag models: The use of modelling in management contexts. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor, and Francis, London, pp. 236–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, J., and Madsen, T. (1992). Data structures for excavation recording. A case of complex information management. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, J. B., III (1979), Archaeological applications of computer drawn contour and three dimensional perspective plots. In Upham, S. (ed.), Computer Graphics in Archaeology, Anthropological Research Papers, No. 15, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo-Bishop, D. (1991). The ArchaeoDATA system: Towards a European archaeological document. In Lockyear, K., and Rahtz, S. P. Q. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1990, BAR International Series, No. 565, Oxford, pp. 61–70.

  • Arroyo-Bishop, D. (1992). Further structuring of the ArcheoDATA system. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 89–94.

  • Arroyo-Bishop, D., and Zarzosa, L. (1992). The ArchaeoDATA system: A method for structuring a European archaeological information system (AIS). In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo-Bishop, D., and Zarzosa, L. (1995). To be or not to be: Will an object-space-time GIS/AIS become a reality or end up an archaeological entity? In Lock, G. R., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baena, J., Blasco, C., and Recuero, V. (1995). The spatial analysis of Bell Beaker sites in the Madrid region. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamforth, D. B. (1994). Discussant remarks in the symposium “Albert Spaulding and the continuation of archaeological science,” presented at the annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Anaheim, CA.

  • Bampton, M., and Hamilton, N. (1996). GIS, education and stewardship in Casco Bay Estuary, Maine. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beex, W. (1995). From excavation drawing to archaeological playground: CAD applications for excavations. In Wilcock, J., and Lockyear, K. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1993, BAR International Series, No. 598, Oxford, pp. 101–108.

  • Berry, J. K. (1995). Spatial Reasoning for Effective GIS, GIS World, Inc., Fort Collins, Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bfro, K. T., and Fejes, I. Sz. (1995). GIS applications at the Hungarian National Museum, Department of Information. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.). Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 261–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biskowski, M. (1994). GIS and the study of grinding tools in the Teotihuacan Valley, Mexico. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No, 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswell, S., Cropper, L., Evans, J., Gaffney, V., and Leach, P. (1995). GIS and excavation: A cautionary tale from Shepton Mallet, Somerset, England. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaz, J. S., and Uleberg, E. (1993). Gardermoen Project: Use of a GIS system in antiquities registration and research. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 177–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosqued, C. B., Preysler, J. B., and Expiago, J. (1996). The role of GIS in the management of archaeological data: An example of application for the Spanish administration. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R., Groenewoudt, B. J., and Kvamme, K. L. (1992) An experiment in archaeological site location: Modeling in the Netherlands using GIS techniques. World Archaeology 24: 268–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canouts, V. (1992). Computerized information exchange on the local and natural levels in USA. In Larsen, C. (ed.). Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, D. L. (1990). GIS predictive modelling of prehistoric site distributions in central Montana. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 216–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, C. (1985). Introductory remarks on regional analysis. In Carr, C. (ed.), For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: Bridging Data Structure, Quantitative Technique, and Theory, Westport Publishers, Kansas City, MO, pp. 114–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T. L., and Turner, M. D. (1996). Investigating regional lithic procurement using multispectral imagery and geophysical exploration. Archaeological Prospection 3: 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A. J. (1978). A computer simulation of Mycenean settlement. In Hodder, I. (ed.). Simulation Studies in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A. J. (1979). Settlement simulation. In Renfrew, C., and Cooke, D. (eds.), Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change, Academic Press, New York, pp. 237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, J. A. (1996). Archaeological resource visibility and GIS: A case study in Yorkshire. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA9S, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 387–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, J., Richards, J., and Vyner, B. (1993). Bridging the urban-rural gap: GIS and the York Environs Project. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 159–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. A. (1979). Spatial association at Liencres, an early Holocene open site on the Santander coast, north-central Spain. In Upham, S. (ed.), Computer Graphics in Archaeology, Anthropological Research Papers, No. 15, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 121–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp, S. A. (1977). A quick plotting program for archaeological data. Newsletter of Computer Archaeology 13: 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, D. J. (1988). GIS versus CAD versus DBMS: What are the differences? Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54: 1551–1555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaki, G., Jerem, E., and Redo, F. (1995). Data recording and GIS applications in landscape and intrasite analysis: Case studies in progress at the Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Bona, L. (1993). A preliminary predictive model of prehistoric activity location for the western Lake Nipigon watershed. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 37: 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Bona, L., and Larcombe, L. (1996). Modeling prehistoric land use in northern Ontario. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 252–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, A. (1995). Geophysical Survey in Archaeological Field Evaluation, Research and Professional Services Guideline, No. 1, English Heritage Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lapparent, V., Geller, M. J., and Huchra, J. P. (1986). A slice of the universe. Astrophysical Journal (Letters) 302: L1–L5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doody, M., Synnott, P., Tobin, R., and Masterson, B. (1995). A topographic survey of the inland promontory fort at Castle Gale, Carrig Henry, County Limerick. In Discovery Programme Reports 2: Project Results 1993, Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, pp. 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnell, R. C., and Dancey, W. S. (1983). The siteless survey: A regional scale data collection strategy. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 6, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, J. I. (1978). Remote sensing and large-scale cultural resources management. In Lyons, T. R., and Ebert, J. I. (eds.), Remote Sensing and Nondestructive Archaeology, National Park Service, Washington, DC, pp. 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, J. I. (1988). Remote sensing in archaeological prospection and prediction. In Judge, W. J., and Sebastian, L. (eds.), Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, pp. 429–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, J. I., Camilli, E. L., and Berman, M. J. (1996). GIS in the analysis of distributional archaeological data. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Effland, R. W. (1979). Statistical distribution cartography and computer graphics. In Upham, S. (ed.) Computer Graphics in Archaeology, Anthropological Research Papers, No. 15, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada Belli, F. (1997). GPS and GIS as aids for mapping archaeological sites. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 47: 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J. A., Limp, W. F., and Lockhart, J. (1990). The archaeologist’s workbench: Integrating GIS, remote sensing, EDA and database management. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 141–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J. A., and Gisiger, A. (1996). Managing the infrastructure: The use of a corporate metadata for archaeology. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 275–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, K. L. (1979). Geographic patterning of tool types as elicited by trend surface analysis. In Upham, S. (ed.), Computer Graphics in Archaeology, Anthropological Research Papers, No. 15, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. (1992). First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: Simulating fuzzy viewsheds. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58: 345–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, P. F., and Lindenberg, R. E. (1989). On distinctions among cartography, remote sensing, and geographic information systems. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 55: 1431–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flude, K., George, S., and Roskams, S. (1982). Uses of an archaeological database with particular reference to computer graphics and the writing-up process. In Computer Applications in Archaeology 1981, Institute of Archaeology, University of London, London, pp. 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, M. (1995). Scientific visualization and archaeological landscape: The case study of a Terramarra, Italy. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forte, M., and Guidazzoli, A. (1996). Archaeology, GIS and desktop virtual reality: The ARCTOS Project. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 443–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., and Stancic, Z. (1991). GIS Approaches to Regional Analysis: A Case Study of the Island of Hvar, Znanstveni Institut Filozofske Fakultete, Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., and van Leusen, P. M. (1995). Postscript: GIS, environmental determinism and archaeology. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 367–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., and van Leusen, M. (1996). Extending GIS methods for regional archaeology: The Wroxeter Hinterland Project. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 297–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., Ostir, K., Podobnikar, T., and Stancic, Z. (1996). Satellite imagery and GIS applications in Mediterranean landscapes. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 337–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., Stancic, Z., and Watson, H. (1995). The impact of GIS on archaeology: A personal perspective. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., Stancic, Z., and Watson, H. (1996). Moving from catchments to cognition: Tentative steps toward a larger archaeological context for GIS. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 132–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geller, M. J. (1988). Mapping the universe: Slices and bubbles. In Cornell, J. (ed.), Bubbles, Voids, and Bumps in Time: The New Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 50–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillings, M. (1995). Flood dynamics and settlement in the Tisza Valley of north-east Hungary: GIS and the upper Tisza Project. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 67–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillings, M., and Goodrick, G. T. (1996). Sensuous and reflexive GIS: Exploring visualization and VRML. Internet Archaeology 1: (http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issuel/gillings-toc.html).

  • Gould, P., and White, R. (1974). Mental Maps, Penguin Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. F., and Stewart, J. B. (1983), Computer generated research aids using the forest service DTIS II system. Advances in Computer Archaeology 1: 4–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenewoudt, B. J., and Wiemer, R. (1993). Valkenburg-Marktveld: Analyzing the predictive potential of Roman surface scatters using GIS. In Van Dierendonck, R. M., Hallewas, D. P., and Waugh, K. E. (eds.). The Valkenburg Excavations 1985–1988: Introduction and Detail Studies, Rijksdienst voor bet Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek, Amersfoort, Netherlands, pp. 47–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillot, D. (1992). The national archaeological record of France: Advances in computerization. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillot, D., and Leroy, G. (1995). The use of GIS for archaeological resource management in France: The SCALA Project, with a case study in Picardie. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, J., and Creamer, W. (1993). Stress and Warfare Among the Kayenta Anasazi of the Thirteenth Century A. D., Fieldiana Anthropology New Series, No. 21, Field Museum of Anthropology, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. S. (1992). Mapping the Next Millenium: How Computer-Driven Cartography Is Revolutionizing the Face of Science, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H. J. (1993). European archaeological databases: Problems and prospects. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. M., and Lock, G. R. (1990). The diffusion of a new technology: A perspective on the adoption of a geographic information system within UK archaeology. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. M., and Lock, G. R. (1992). Toward a regional GIS site information retrieval system: The Oxfordshire sites and monuments record (SMR) prototype. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T., and Lock, G. (1995). Toward an evaluation of GIS in European archaeology: The past, present and future of theory and applications. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. M., and Lock, G. R. (1996). Multi-dimensional GIS: Exploratory approaches to spatial and temporal relationships within archaeological stratigraphy. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 307–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenstab, R. J. (1983). A Preliminary Cultural Resource Sensitivity Analysis for the Proposed Flood Control Facilities Construction in the Passaic River Basin of New Jersey, Report submitted to the Passaic River Basin Special Studies Branch, Department of the Army, New York District Army Corps of Engineers, Soil Systems, Inc., Marietta, GA.

  • Hasenstab, R. J. (1996). Settlement as adaptation: Variability in Iroquois village site selection as inferred through GIS. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenstab, R. J., and Resnick, B. (1990). GIS in historical predictive modelling: The Fort Drum project. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 284–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinshelwood, A., and Dalla Bona, L. (1994). GIS and intrasite analysis: An example from northwestern Ontario. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 40: 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, E. (1996). Preliminary results from Mn/Model. Mn/Model Newsletter 2: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I., and Orton, C. (1976). Spatial Analysis in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, S. (1996). GIS and open site archeology in western New South Wales, Australia. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. I: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E. D. (1992). Upgrading site-catchment analyses with the use of GIS: Investigating the settlement patterns of horticulturists. World Archaeology 24: 283–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. K. (1996). Delta digitizing: GIS and remote sensing in northwest Mississippi. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.). New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modem Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 242–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. K., Madry, S. L. H., and Sever, T. (1988). Remote sensing and GIS analysis in large scale survey design in north Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology 7: 124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. (1996). TMAPPER! High quality map production with IDRISI vector data. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 45: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, W. J., and Sebastian, L. (eds.) (1988). Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, U. S. Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, Denver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkinen, T. (1996). Center in the wilderness area using a geographical information system (GIS) in modelling the Late Iron Age settlement in eastern Finland. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. A., and Gumerman, G. J. (1996). Beyond GIS: Populating worlds with agents. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, T. A., and Parker, S. C. (1986). Predictive models for archaeological resource location. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York, pp. 397–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotsakis, K., Andreau, S., Vargas, A., and Papoudas, D. (1995). Reconstructing a Bronze Age site with CAD. In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 181–188.

  • Kuna, M., and Adelsbergerova, D. (1995). Prehistoric location preferences: An application of GIS to the Vinorsky Potok project, Bohemia, the Czech Republic. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1984). Models of prehistoric site location near Pinon Canyon, Colorado. In Condie, C. J. (ed.), The Archaeology of Northeastern New Mexico, New Mexico Archaeological Council, Albuquerque, pp. 347–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1989). Geographic information systems in regional archaeological research and data management. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 1, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 139–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1990a). One-sample tests in regional archaeological analysis: New possibilities through computer technology. American Antiquity 55: 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1990b). The fundamental principles and practice of predictive archaeological modeling. In Voorrips, A. (ed.), Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: A Flexible Framework, Studies in Modern Archaeology, Vol. 3, Holes-Verlag, Bonn, Germany, pp. 257–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1992a). Geographic information systems and archaeology. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 77–84.

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1992b). Terrain form analysis of archaeological location through geographic information systems. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 127–136.

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1992c). A predictive site location model on the High Plains: An example with an independent test. Plains Anthropologist 37: 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1992). Spatial statistics and GIS: An integrated approach. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 91–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1994). Ranter’s corner —GIS graphics vs. spatial statistics: How do they fit together? Archaeological Computing Newsletter 38: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1995). A view from across the water: The North American experience in archaeological GIS. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1996a). Investigating chipping debris scatters: GIS as an analytical engine. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modem Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 38–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1996b). A proton magnetometry survey at Navan Fort. Emania 14: 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1996c). Randomization methods for statistical inference in raster GIS contexts. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Prolohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1997). Ranter’s comer—Bringing the camps together: GIS and ED. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 47: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L, and Jochim, M. A. (1989). The environmental basis of Mesolithic settlement. In Bonsail, C. (ed.), The Mesolithic in Europe: Papers Presented at the Third International Symposium, John Donald Publishers, Edinburgh, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, T. N., McLachlan, S. M., Ross, S. C. L., Sheppard, P. J., and Sutton, D. G. (1995). GIS-based image enhancement of conductivity and magnetic susceptibility data from Ureturituri Pa and Fort Resolution, New Zealand. American Antiquity 60: 471–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, L. (1994). GPS on the right trail. Government Technology 7: 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, N. A. R. (1993). From model to machine procurement and implementation of geographical information systems for county sites and monuments records. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, C. (ed.) (1992). Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, P. (1975). Trend analysis in archaeology: A preliminary study of intrasite patterning, Norwegian Archaeological Review 8: 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, C. A., and March, J. G. (1975). An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limp, W. F. (1989). The Use of Multispectral Digital Imagery in Archeological Investigations, Research Series No. 24, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limp, W. F. (1991). Continuous cost movement models. In Behrens, C. A., and Sever, T. L. (eds.), Applications of Space Age Technology in Anthropology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science and Technology Laboratory, John C. Stennis Space Center, MS, pp. 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limp, W. F. (1992). The challenge of automated systems in archaeology. Federal Archeology Report 5: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limp, W. F. (1996). Developing methodologies in the analysis of spatially referenced data and their impacts on archaeological method and theory. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.). The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limp, W. F., and Gisiger, A. (1992). Continental scale archaeology studies using GIS. Federal Archeology Report 5: 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llobera, M. (1996). Exploring the topography of mind: GIS, social space and archaeology. Antiquity 70: 612–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, G. R. (1993). GIS or CAD: What’s in a name? Archaeological Computing Newsletter 37: 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, G. (1995). Archaeological computing, archaeological theory and moves toward contextualism. In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 13–18.

  • Lock, G., and Harris, T. (1992). Visualizing spatial data: The importance of geographic information systems. In Reilly, P., and Rahtz, S. (eds.), Archaeology and the Information Age: A Global Perspective, Routledge, London, pp. 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, G. R., and Harris, T. M. (1996). Danebury revisited: An English Iron Age hillfort in a digital landscape. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 214–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madry, S. L. H. (1990). The realities of hardware. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madry, S. L. H., and Crumley, C. L. (1990). An application of remote sensing and GIS in a regional archaeological settlement pattern analysis: The Arroux River Valley, Burgundy, France. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.). Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 364–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madry, S. L. H., and Rakos, L. (1996). Line-of-sight and cost-surface techniques for regional research in the Arroux River Valley. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 104–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, T. (1996). GIS and Scandinavian archaeology: A tale from the real world. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marble, D. F. (1984). Geographic information systems: An overview. In Spatial Information Technologies for Remote Sensing Today and Tomorrow, Proceedings of Pecora 9, IEEE, Silver Springs, MD, pp. 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschner, H. D. G. (1996a). Geographic information systems in archaeology. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschner, H. D. G. (1996b). The politics of settlement choice on the Northwest coast: GIS, cognition, and coastal landscapes. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 175–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschner, H. D. G. (1996c). Review of Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: European Perspective [Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), 1995, Taylor and Francis, London]. Geoarchaeology 11: 505–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschner, H. D. G., and Stein, J. (1995). Multivariate approaches to site location on the northwest coast of North America. Antiquity 69: 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massagrande, F. A. (1995). Using GIS with non-systematic survey data: The Mediterranean evidence. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClung de Tapia, E., and Tapia-Recillas, H. (1996). Statistical analysis using G1S in the study of Prehispanic settlement location in the Teotihuacan region, Mexico. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. I: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, M. (1995). Spatial relations in Roman Iron Age settlements in the Assendelver polders, the Netherlands. In Lock, G., and Staniif, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 287–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, R., and Winstanley, D. (1993). GIS in a landscape archaeology context. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelson, D. M., and Larsen, J. H. (1992). Recording archaeological sites in Norway. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (1995). How to look good and influence people: Thoughts on the design and interpretation of an archaeological GIS. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 319–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. A. (1996). Digging deep: GIS in the city. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, D. M. (1995). The management of archaeological information: A strategy. In Wilcock, J., and Lockyear, K. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1993, BAR International Series, No. 598, Oxford, pp. 83–88.

  • Music, B. (1995). On-site prospection in Slovenia: The case of Rodik. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 43: 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, C. (1993). The Tara survey: Interim report. In Discovery Programme Reports 1: Project Results 1992, Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, pp. 70–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunez, M., Vikkula, A., and Kirkinen, T. (1995). Perceiving time and space in an isostatically rising region. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenshaw, S. (1991). A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put Humty-Dumpty back together again. Environment and Planning A 23: 621–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswald, A. (1996). Restoring a thirteenth century castle wall using GIS. ARCNews 18: 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozawa, K., Kato, T., and Tsude, H. (1995). Detection of beacon networks between ancient hill-forts using a digital terrain model based GIS. In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.). Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 157–162.

  • Palumbo, G. (1993). JADIS (Jordan Antiquities Database and Information System): An example of national archaeological inventory and GIS applications. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (1985). Predictive modeling of site settlement systems using multivariate logistics. In Carr, C. (ed.), For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: Bridging Data Structure, Quantitative Technique, and Theory, Westport Publishers, Kansas City, MO, pp. 173–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (1986). The role of geographic information systems in cultural resource management. In Opitz, B. K. (ed.). Geographic Information Systems in Government, Vol. 1, A. Deepak Publishing, Hampton, VA, pp. 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, O. L. (1992). Geographic information systems: Archaeology’s latest tool. Biblical Archaeologist 55: 162–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, L., Johnson, I., Cullen, B., and Kvamme, K. L. (1995). GIS in Archaeology: An Annotated Bibliography, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 1, Sydney University, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, F. T, and Hill, J. N. (1971). Explaining variability in the distribution of sites. In Gumerman, G. J. (ed.), The Distribution of Prehistoric Population Aggregates, Anthropological Reports, No. 1, Prescott College Press, Prescott, AZ, pp. 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, R., Jorstad, T., and Cole, D. (1996). The role of GIS in the interdisciplinary investigations at Olorgesailie, Kenya, a Pleistocene archaeological locality. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 202–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preysler, J. B., and Blasco, C. (1996). Application of GIS to images and their processing: The Chiribiquete Mountains Project. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raper, J., (1989). Three Dimensional Applications in Geographic Information Systems, Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C., and Level, E. V. (1979). Exploring dominance: Predicting polities from centers. In Renfrew, C., and Cooke, K. L. (eds.), Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change, Academic Press, New York, pp. 145–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynoso, C., and Castro, D. (1994). VB-GIS 3D: A GIS specifically designed for archaeology. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 135–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. D. (1996). Putting the site in its setting: GIS and the search for Anglo-Saxon settlement in Noithumbria. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H. (1993). The archaeological implications of a computerized integrated national heritage information system. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, D. G., and Tolba, O. (1995). Remote sensing, GIS and electronic surveying: Reconstructing the city plan and landscape of Roman Corinth. In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 163–174.

  • Roorda, I. M., and Wiemer, R., (1992a). Towards a new archaeological information system in the Netherlands. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 85–88.

  • Roorda, I., and Wiemer, R. (1992b). The ARCHIS Project: Towards a new national archaeological record in the Netherlands. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, A. J., and Church, R. L. (1996). Spatial allocation in archaeology: An opportunity for reevaluation. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 147–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, C. L. N., Medyckyj-Scott, D. J., and Gruffydd, A. (1993). Multiple viewshed analysis using GIS and its archaeological application: A case study in northern Mull. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggles, C. L. N., and Medyckyj-Scott, D. J. (1996). Site location, landscape visibility, and symbolic astronomy: A Scottish case study. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 127–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanz, F. Q., Preysler, J. B., and Bosqued, C. B. (1995). An application of GIS to intra-site spatial analysis: The Iberian Iron Age cemetery of El Cigarralejo (Murcia, Spain). In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 137–146.

  • Savage, S. H. (1990a). GIS in archaeological research. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S. H. (1990b). Modelling the Late Archaic social landscape. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 330–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollar, I. (1966). Computer treatment of magnetic measurements from archaeological sites. Archaeometry 9: 61–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollar, I., Tabbagh, A., Hesse, A., and Herzog, I. (1990). Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian, L., and Judge, J. W. (1988). Predicting the past: Correlation, explanation, and the use of archaeological models. In Judge, W. J., and Sebastian, L. (eds.), Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. (1988). Quantifying Archaeology, Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shermer, S. J., and Tiffany, J. A. (1985). Environmental variables as factors in site location: An example from the upper Midwest. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 10: 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. R. (1994). Using MapInfo to map archaeological data. In Johnson, I. (ed.). Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 143–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. R. (1996). GIS applications in North America. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancic, Z. (1994). Locational analysis and settlement studies with GIS. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancic, Z., and Gaffney, V. (1996). GIS based analysis of the population trends on the island of Brac in Central Dalmatia. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancic, Z., Dular, J., Gaffney, V., and Tecco-Hvala, S. (1995). A GIS-based analysis of later prehistoric settlement patterns in Dolenjska, Slovenia. In Wilcock, J., and Lockyear, K. (ed.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1993, BAR International Series, No. 598, Oxford, pp. 161–164.

  • Star, J., and Estes, J. E. (1990). Geographic Information Systems: An Introduction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, S. (1995). Humans and PETS in space. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 313–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J., Sluckin, T. J., Denholm, D. R., and Gamble, C. S. (1996). Simulating hunter-gatherer colonization of the Americas. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.). Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. H., and Bellinger, R. L. (1976). Prehistoric Pinon Ecotone Settlements of the Upper Reese River Valley, Central Nevada, Anthropological Papers, Vol. 53, No.3, American Museum of Natural History, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, D. (1981) Introductory Spatial Analysis, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leusen, P. M. (1993). Cartographic modelling in a cell-based GIS. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leusen, P. M. (1996). GIS and location modeling in Dutch archaeology: A review of current approaches. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.). New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 177–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van West, C. (1994). Modeling Prehistoric Agricultural Productivity in Southwestern Colorado: A GIS Approach, Department of Anthropology Reports of Investigations, No. 67, Washington State University, Pullman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van West, C., and Kohler, T. A. (1996). A time to rend, a time to sew: New perspectives on Northern Anasazi sociopolitical development in late prehistory. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 107–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikkula, A. (1994). Stone Age environment and landscape changes on the eastern Finnish Lake District. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vita-Finzi, C., and Higgs, E. S. (1970). Prehistoric economy in the Mount Carmel area of Palestine: Site catchment analysis. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 36: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansleeben, M. (1988). Applications of geographical information systems in archaeological research. In Rahtz, S. P. Q. (ed.), Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1988, Vol. 2, BAR International Series, No. 446 (ii), Oxford, pp. 435–451.

  • Wansleeben, M., and Verhart, L. B. M. (1995). GIS on different spatial levels and the Neolithization process in the south-eastern Netherlands. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. E. (1990a). Predictive modelling in archaeology: A primer. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 90–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R. E. (1990b). Predictive modeling of archaeological site location: A case study in the Midwest. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (1993). Going over old ground: GIS, archaeological theory and the act of perception. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (1995a). The impact of information technology on the practice of archaeological management. In Cooper, M. A., Firth, A., Carman, J., and Wheatley, D. (eds.), Managing Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (1995b). Cumulative viewshed analysis: A GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeological application. In Lock, G., and Stands, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (1996). The use of GIS to understand regional variation in Earlier Neolithic Wessex. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 75–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer, R. (1995). Another way to deal with maps in archaeological GIS. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 301–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, I., Limp, W. F., and Briuer, F. L. (1990). Using geographic information systems and exploratory data analysis for archaeological site classification and analysis. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 239–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrow, E. B. W. (1990a). The fantasies of GIS software. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 184–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrow, E. B. W. (1990b). Modelling and prediction with geographic information systems: A demographic example from prehistoric and historic New York. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 307–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrow, E. B. W. (1994). Knowledge representation and archaeology: A cognitive example using GIS. In Renfrew, C., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 107–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrow, E. (1997). Clusters of death, pockets of survival: Dynamic modelling and GIS. In van der Leeuw, S., and McGlade, J. (eds.), Time, Process and Structured Transformation in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 216–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrow, E. B. W., and Harbaugh, J. W. (1978). Archaeological prospecting: Kriging and simulation. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Simulation Studies in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

BIBLIOGRAPHY OF RECENT LITERATURE

  • Ackerly, N. W. (1994). Analyses of historic New Mexican acequia systems using GIS technology. Geo Info Systems 4: 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldenderfer, M, and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.) (1996). Anthropology, Space and Geographical Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. M. S. (1990). Manipulating space: A commentary on GIS applications. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. M. S. (1990). Modelling early historic trade in the eastern Great Lakes using geographic information systems. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 319–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.) (1990). Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andresen, J. T., Masden, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.) (1993). Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA1992, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baena, F. J., Quesada, F., and Blasco, M. C. (1996). An application of GIS intra-site analysis to museum display. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 465–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.) (1996). The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biro, K. T. (1996). Simple fun: Interactive computer demonstration program on the exhibition of the Szentgal-Tuzkoveshegy prehistoric industrial area. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaz, J. S., and Uleberg, E. (1995). The potential of GIS-based studies of Iron Age cultural landscapes in eastern Norway. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 249–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomba, P. E., Carstens, K., and Brown, A. K. (1993). A cartographic geographic information system for the archaeological study of Fort Jefferson, Kentucky. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ESRI User Conference, Palm Springs, California, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, pp. 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Califano, A. (1994). Rome links ancient cartographic data with GIS technology. Geo Info Systems 4: 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castleford, J. (1992). Archaeology, GIS, and the time dimension: An overview. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 95–104.

  • Chittenden, B. (1990). GIS technology used in American battlefield protection program. CRM Bulletin 13: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopherson, G. L., Guertin, D. P., and Borstad, K. A. (1996). Increasing our understanding of ancient Jordan with ARC/INFO. ARCNews 18: 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, J. B. (1995). Future enhancements to GIS: Implications for archaeological theory. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crumley, C. L., and Marquardt, W. H. (1990). Landscape: A unifying concept in regional analysis. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dann, M. A., and Yerkes, R. W. (1994). Use of geographic information systems for the spatial analysis of Frankish settlements in the Korinthia, Greece. In Kardulias, P. N. (ed.), Beyond the Site: Regional Studies in the Aegean Area, University Press of America, Lanham, MD, pp. 289–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doganis, T. (1996). Parthenon renovation gets a big boost with GIS. ARCNews 18: 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, J. I. (1996). Human origins investigated with digital mapping and GIS. ARCNews 18: 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyg, P., and Bodin, U. (1996). GIS-applications in Swedish archaeology. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Futato, E. M. (1991). GIS modelling of archaeological site locations: A low-tech approach. In Behrens, C. A., and Sever, T. L. (eds.), Applications of Space Age Technology in Anthropology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science and Technology Laboratory, John C. Stennis Space Center, MS, pp. 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., and Stancic, Z. (1991). Predicting the past: GIS and archaeology. Geo-Information-Systeme 4: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., and Stancic, Z. (1992). Diodorus Siculus and the island of Hvar, Dalmatia: Testing the text with GIS. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 113–123.

  • Gaffney, V., and Stancic, Z. (1994). GIS and historical archaeology: The case of the island of Hvar in Croatia. Archeologia E Calcolatori 5: 257–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney, V., Staniic, Z., and Farley, J. (1993). Geographical information systems, territorial analysis and prehistoric agriculture on the island of Hvar, Dalmatia. In Fabis, M., Kuzma, I., and Markova, K. (eds.), Actes du XIIe Congres International des Sciences Pre-et Proto-Historiques, Bratislava, 1–7 Septembre 1991, Institut Archeologique de l’Academie Slovaque des Sciences a Nitra, Bratislava, pp. 407–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillings, M. (1996). Not drowning but waving? Re-humanizing GIS, the Tisza flood plain revisited. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. (1996). Geographic information systems and spatial analysis in the social sciences. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographical Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. W. (1990). Sorting out settlement in southeastern Ireland: Landscape archaeology and geographic information systems. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 356–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, N. K., and Sale, K. (1994). Where art thou? The AIATSIS rock art database and GIS project 1993.

  • In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 53–60.

  • Huggett, J. W. (1992). Integrating databases and graphics: A prelude to geographic information systems. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 30: 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. M. (1990). Building and historic settlement database in GIS. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 274–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, E., Meachan, J., and Cutting, D. (1994). Patterns on the steppe: Applying GIS to the archaeology of the Altay Mountains. Geo Info Systems 4: 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, I. (1996). Desktop mapping and raster GIS: Best of both worlds? In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. K. (1990). Settlement patterns, GIS, remote sensing and the late prehistory of the Black Prairie in east central Mississippi. In Behrens, C. A., and Sever, T. L. (eds.), Applications of Space Age Technology in Anthropology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science and Technology Laboratory, John C. Stennis Space Center, MS, pp. 111–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katsaridis, P., and Tsigourakos, P. (1993). The use of GIS in land use planning for the protection of the Delfi hinterland (Greece). In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ESRI User Conference, Palm Springs, California. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA pp. 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, A. B., and Johnson, I. (1994). Quantifying survey data from Cyprus: The use of aerial photos for field recording and GIS input. In Johnson, I. (ed.). Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 157–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoerl, J. J. (1995). Mapping history using geographic information systems. The Public Historian 13: 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krist Jr., F. J., and Brown, D. G. (1995). GIS modelling of Paleo-Indian period caribou migration and viewsheds in northeastern lower Michigan. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60: 1129–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1990). GIS algorithms and their effects on regional archaeological analysis. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 112–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1990). Predictive cultural resource modeling at Pinon Canyon: 1984–85. In Andrefsky, W. (ed.), An Introduction to the Archaeology of Pinon Canyon, Southeastern Colorado, Volume 1: Background and Methods, National Park Service, Rocky Mountain Regional Office, Denver, pp. 6–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvamme, K. L. (1993). Computer methods: Geographic information systems (Appendix. B). In Haas, J., and Creamer, W., Stress and Warfare Among the Kayenta Anasazi of the Thirteenth Century A. D., Fieldiana Anthropology New Series, No. 21, Field Museum of Anthropology, Chicago, pp. 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.) (1995). Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marozas, B. A., and Zack, J. A. (1990). GIS and archaeological site location. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martlew, R. (1996). The contribution of GIS to the study of landscape evolution in the Yorkshore Dales, UK. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.) (1996). New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modem Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschner, H. D. G. (1996). Theory, technology, and the future of geographic information systems in archaeology. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 301–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massagrande, F. A. (1995). A GIS approach to the study of non-systematically collected data: A case study from the Mediterranean. In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 147–156.

  • Massagrande, F. (1996). The Romans in southwestern Spain: Total conquest or partial assimilation? Can GIS answer? In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 325–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mytum, H. (1996). Intrasite patterning and the temporal dimension using GIS: The example of Kellington churchyard. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuestupny, E. (1995). Beyond GIS. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.). Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogleby, C. (1994). Geographic information systems in archaeology and anthropology: A case study from the Arawe Islands, Papua New Guinea. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterman, G. L. (1993). GIS and archaeology in Jordan. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 189–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J., and Smith, V. J. R. (1995). A GIS study of potential traces of a Roman cadastre and soil types in Romney marsh. In Wilcock, J., and Lockyear, K. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1993, BAR International Series, No. 598, Oxford, pp. 155–158.

  • Phillips, J. C., and McKenzie, C. L. (1992). Archaeology and the Geographic Analysis Support System: An Evaluation of a Soil Conservation Service Model of Archaeological Site Locations in Santa Rosa County, Florida, Report of Investigations, No. 47, Archaeology Insitute, University of West Florida, Pensacola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahtz, S. P. Q. (1992). GISsing the henge and making it cry. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 30: 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynoso, C., (1994). VB-GIS 3D: A development report on a GIS model for archaeology. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 38: 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, D. G., and Tolba, O. (1996). Remote sensing and GIS in the study of Roman centuriation in the Corinthia, Greece. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Ptaehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 457–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W., Dallas, A., Parker, D., and Milder, D. W. (1995). GIS principles to an English country house: The Brodsworth Hall project. In Wilcock, J., and Lockyear, K. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1993, BAR International Series, No. 598, Oxford, pp. 259–262.

  • Ruggles, C. (1992). Abstract data structures for GIS applications in archaeology. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 107–112.

  • Saile, T., and Zimmermann, A. (1996). Cattle or crops. Applications of GIS in central Germany. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1995). Towards a study of ancient Greek landscapes: The Perseus GIS. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spikins, P. (1995). ‘Vitual landscapes’: GIS and lithic scatters. In Schofield, A. J. (ed.), Lithics in Context, Lithic Studies Society Occasional Paper, No. 5, British Museum, London, pp. 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stine, L. F., and Stine, R. S. (1990). GIS, archaeology, and freedom of information. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 54–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stine, R. S., and Decker, T. D. (1990). Archaeology, data integration and GIS. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.). Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stine, R. S., and Lanter, D. P. (1990). Considerations for archaeology database design. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 80–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, S., Belcher, M., and Harrison, A. (1996). L’applicazione del GIS all’Etruria meridionale. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 185–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leusen, P. M. (1995). GIS and archaeological resource management: A European agenda. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Waarden, N., and Wilson B. (1994). Developing a hydrological model of the Lake Condah fish traps in western Victoria using GIS. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, P. (1996). The use of GIS as a tool for modelling ecological change and human occupation in the Middle Aguas Valley (S. E. Spain). In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, P., and Mc Glade, J. (1996). Spatialising dynamical modelling: A new opportunity for GIS. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen, P., McGlade, J., Risch, R., and Gili, S. (1995). Some criteria for modelling socio-economic activities in the Bronze Age of south-east Spain. In Lock, G, and Stancic, Z. (eds.). Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorrips, A. (1996). Archaeological theory and GIS, any relations? In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, D. (1996). Between the lines: The role of GIS-based predictive modelling in the interpretation of extensive survey data. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, I., Parker, S., and Limp, W. F. (1990). The integration of GRASS, GIS, S, and regional database management: A comprehensive interactive environment for spatial analysis. In Voorrips, A., and Ottaway, B. (eds.), New Tools from Mathematical Archaeology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, pp. 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterhalder, B., and Evans, T. (1991). Preliminary GIS analysis of the agricultural landscape of Cuyo Cuyo. In Behrens, C. A., and Sever, T. L. (eds.), Applications of Space Age Technology in Anthropology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science and Technology Laboratory, John C. Stennis Space Center, MS, pp. 195–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrow, E. B. W. (1990). Contemplating space: A commentary on theory. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: CIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrow, E. B. W., and Green, S. W. (1990). Coping with space: Commentary on data sources, hardware and software. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology and Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701, USA

    Kenneth L. Kvamme

Authors
  1. Kenneth L. Kvamme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kvamme, K.L. Recent Directions and Developments in Geographical Information Systems. J Archaeol Res 7, 153–201 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-005-0002-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-005-0002-9

Key Words

Search

Navigation