Journal of Applied Spectroscopy

, Volume 80, Issue 4, pp 565–570 | Cite as

Micro-Raman characterization of InGaN/GaN single quantum well nanocolumns on Si(111) substrate

  • P. Sangeetha
  • V. Sasirekha
  • R. Vadivelu
  • K. Kishino
  • V. Ramakrishnan
Article

The phonon mode behavior of InGaN/GaN single quantum well (SQW) nanocolumns grown on silicon (111) substrate was investigated by micro-Raman scattering technique. The samples were synthesized using radio frequency (RF) plasma-assisted molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). High temperature (1020°C) grown AlN (about 5 nm) was used as a buffer. Raman spectra were recorded at room temperature with a confocal micro-Raman spectrometer in the backscattering geometry. The Raman spectra showed that the \( E_2^{\mathrm{high}} \) mode of GaN and the AO phonon mode of silicon were clearly visible. On the basis of these studies, the tensile stress and size of the GaN nanocolumns were calculated with respect to the \( E_2^{\mathrm{high}} \) mode of GaN. The nanosize dependence of the peak shift of the \( E_2^{\mathrm{high}} \) mode was discussed. These results were in good agreement with the calculated spatial correlation model.

Keywords

micro-Raman spectra gallium nitride tensile stress spatial correlation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. Sekine, S. Suzuki, H. Kuroe, M. Tada, A. Kikuchi, and K. Kishino, Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol., 4, 227–232 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Sanchez-Paramo, J. M. Calleja, M. A. Sanchez-Garcia, E. Calleja, and U. Jahn, Physica E, 13 (2002) 1070–1073.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Benyoucel, M. Kuball, B. Beaumont, and P. Gibart, Appl. Phys. Lett., 80, 2275–2277 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. P. Ho, K. C. Lo, G. G. Siu, C. Surya, K. F. Li, and K. W. Cheah, Mater. Chem. Phys., 81, 99–103 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. M. Calleja, S. Lazic, J. Sanchez-Paramo, F. Agullo-Rueda, L. Cerutti, J. Ristic, S. Fernandez-Garrido, M. A. Sanchez-Garcia, J. Grandai, E. Calleja, A. Trampert, and U. Jahn, Phys. Status Solidi (b), 244, 2838–2846 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Nakamura, A. Kikuchi, K. Kusakabe, D. Sugihara, Y. Toyoura, T. Yamada, and K. Kishino, Phys. Status Solidi (a), 176, 273–277 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. R. Hu, K. Ochi, Y. Zhao, B. S. Choi, and K. Hane, J. Cryst. Growth, 294, 197–201 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, S. Dhara, and D. Chakravorty, J. Raman Spectrosc., 42, 429–433 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Zhang and L. Zhang, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 35, 1481–1485 (2002).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Kuball, Surf. Interface Anal., 31, 987–999 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    X.-B. Chen, J. L. Morrison, J. Huso, and L. Bergman, J. Appl. Phys., 97, 024302(1-6) (2005).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Puech, F. Demangeot, J. Frandon, C. Pinquier, M. Kuball, V. Domnich, and Y. Gogotsi, J. Appl. Phys., 96, 2853–2856 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Cantarero, A. Cros, N. Garro, M. I. Gomez-Gomez, A. Garcia-Cristobal, M. M. de Lima, Jr., B. Daudin, A. Rizzi, C. Denker, and J. Malindretos, Ann. Phys. (Berlin), 523, 51–61 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Harima, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 14, 967–993 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Z. C. Feng, W. Wang, S. J. Chua, P. X. Zhang, K. P. J. Williams, and G. D. Pitt, J. Raman. Spectrosc., 32, 840–846 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. R. Tallant, T. J. Headley. J. W. Medernach, and F. Geyling, Symposium K: Semiconductor Materials Processing (1993).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O. Kryliouk, M. Reed, T. Dann, T. Anderson, and B. Chai, Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 59, 6–11 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Tripathy, S. J. Chua, P. Chen, and Z. L. Miao, J. Appl. Phys., 92, 3503–3510 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    T. Liang, J. Tang, J. Xiong, Y. Wang, C. Xue, and X. Yang, Vacuum, 84, 1154–1158 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Z. D. Dohcevic-Mitrovic, M. Scepanovic, I. Hinic, M. Grujic-Brojcin, G. Stanisic, and Z. V. Popovic, National Symposium on Condensed Matter Physics, Sokobanja (2004).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Popovici, G. Y. Xu, A. Botchkarev, W. Kim, H. Tang, A. Salvador, H. Morkoc, R. Strange, and J. O. White, J. Appl. Phys., 82, 4020–4023 (1997).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    I. H. Campbell and P. M. Fauchet, Solid State Commun., 58, 739–741 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    H.-L. Liu, C.-C. Chen, C.-T. Chia, C.-C. Yeh, C.-H. Chen, M.-Y. Yu, S. Keller, and S. P. Denbaars, Chem. Phys. Lett., 345, 245–251 (2001).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. Arvanitidis, M. Katsikini, A. Delimitis, Th. Kehagias, Ph. Komninou, E. Dimakis, E. Iliopoulos, and A. Georgakilas, Phys. Status Solidi (b), 243, 1588–1593 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Y. L. Wu, Z. C. Feng, J.-F. Lee, W. Tong, B. K. Wagner, I. Ferguson, and W. Lu, Thin Solid Films., 518, 7475–7479 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Sangeetha
    • 1
  • V. Sasirekha
    • 1
  • R. Vadivelu
    • 2
  • K. Kishino
    • 2
  • V. Ramakrishnan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PhysicsMadurai Kamaraj UniversityMaduraiIndia
  2. 2.Sophia UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations