Journal of Applied Spectroscopy

, Volume 79, Issue 2, pp 330–333 | Cite as

Spectral characteristics of the emission from a barrier discharge plasma based on an Ar–H2O mixture in the UV spectral region

  • A. A. General
  • V. A. Kelman
  • Yu. V. Zjmenjak
  • Yu. O. Shpenik
Article
First Online:
Received:
  • 70 Downloads

We present the results of a study of a barrier-discharge plasma in an Ar–H2O mixture in the UV region of the spectrum (200–500 nm). The saturated water vapor pressure was varied over the range 2.0–2.5 kPa. A comparative study of the spectral characteristics of the plasma based on water vapor and the Ar–H2O mixture showed that the intensity of the emission of the A → X band of the OH● radical increases three-fold in the mixture of water with argon.

Keywords

emission spectrum barrier discharge water vapor 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    É. A. Sosnin, É . A. Zakharova, and V. N. Batalova, Zav. Lab., 71, No. 8, 18–24 (2005).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Koller, M. B. Wimmershoff, C. Hintz, M. Landhalter, and U. Hohenleutner, British J. Dermatology, 152, 750–754 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Ya. Vul’, S. V. Kidalov, V. M. Milenin, N. A. Timofeev, and M. A. Khodorkovskii, Pis’ma v Zh. Tekh. Fiz., 25, No. 1, 1–16 (1999).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. M. Avdeev, "Narrow-band sources of ultraviolet emission based on barrier discharge: Study, design, application," Author’s Abstract, Dissertation in competition for the academic degree of Candidate of Physical-Mathematical Sciences, Tomsk (2007).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. K. Shuaibov, I. V. Shevera, and A. A. General, Zh. Prikl. Spektrosk., 73, No. 6, 831–833 (2006).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. W. Boyd and J.-Y. Zhang, Mater. Res. Soc., 617, J.4.4.1–J.4.4.12 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. S. Polunin, V. V. Kourenkov, and E. G. Polunina, J. Refract. Surgery, 14, No. 2, S230–S234 (1998).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Kanaev, L. Museur, F. Edery, T. Laarmann, and T. Möller, Europ. Phys. J., D, 20, 261–268 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. A. General, V. A. Kelman, Yu. V. Zjmenjak, and Yu. O. Shpenik, Prib. Tekh. Éksp., No. 4, 1–4 (2010).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. K. Shuaibov, A. I. Dashchenko, and I. V. Shevera, Zh. Prikl. Spektrosk., 68, No. 4, 542–546 (2001).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. A. Vostrikov, D. Yu. Dubov, and M. R. Predtechenskii, Zh. Tekh. Fiz., 57, 760–770 (1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. General
    • 1
  • V. A. Kelman
    • 1
  • Yu. V. Zjmenjak
    • 1
  • Yu. O. Shpenik
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Electron PhysicsNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineUzhgorodUkraine

Personalised recommendations