Is Ulva sp. able to be an efficient biofilter for mariculture effluents?
Nitrogenous compounds such as ammonia, nitrate, and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) are the main waste components of marine fish pond effluents. These compounds are also regarded as the primary nitrogen sources for seaweed. Aiming at designing an efficient and cost-effective extractive biofilter for fishpond effluents, Ulva lactuca performance and the dynamics of dissolved inorganic (DIN) and DON uptake by this alga grown in the effluents of a land-based integrated multi-trophic aquaculture (IMTA) system were studied. Stocking densities of 1 and 3 kg m−2 were found to be optimal for yield along with specific growth rate (SGR) and protein content, respectively. The presence of ammonia inhibited nitrate uptake by U. lactuca and carbon limitation reduced SGR and yield. However, protein levels of U. lactuca tissue in a carbon-limited situation were higher than when unlimited carbon was made available. When compared with 3 kg m−2 stocking densities, the high C/N ratio in U. lactuca tissue cultured at 1 kg m−2 likely indicated carbon limitation. Ammonia assimilation rate was density dependent. At 1 kg m−2, ammonia uptake was relatively fast, at 4.31 μmole N h−1, and nitrate uptake started only 24 h after ammonia depletion, suggesting this period to be the time required for nitrate reductase (NR) synthesis in the algae tissue. At 2 kg m−2, ammonia uptake was 2.51 μmole N h−1 and nitrate uptake started 24 h after that observed in 1 kg m−2, suggesting that the lower ammonia threshold for uptake by the U. lactuca is around 1.4 μmole L−1. Contrary to 1 and 2 kg m−2 stocking densities, in the 3 kg m−2 stocking density, ammonia uptake was as low as 1.51 μmole N h−1 and no uptake of nitrate appeared to have taken place due to the presence of ammonia in the water. The additional ammonia in the water was found to be due to DON-ammonifying bacteria on the surface of U. lactuca thalli. In the 1ow stocking density, the additional ammonia was relatively low compared to that measured at the high algae density. In the light of the better understanding of the system dynamics achieved in our study, we hypothesize that a set of similar bioreactors using U. lactuca can intensify the system purification efficiency manifold.
KeywordsUlva lactuca Biofilter Nutrient dynamics Biochemical composition IMTA Aquaculture
We thank Dr. Angelo Colorni for his critical suggestions and Ms. Mikhal Ben-Shaprut for her editorial assistance. We are grateful to Ms. Ala Zalmanson for her invaluable technical assistance.
This research was supported by the ResUrch project (606042): “Research and ecological development to improve economic profitability and environmental sustainability of sea urchin in farming” (http://resurchproject.com) funded by the EU under the FP7 framework.
- AOAC International (1980) Official methods of analysis: method 16193, semimicro-Kjeldahl. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Bruhn A, Dahl J, Nielsen HB, Nikolaisen L, Rasmussen MB, Markager S, Olesen B, Arias C, Jensen PD (2011) Bioenergy potential of Ulva lactuca: Biomass yield, methane production and combustion. Bioresour Technol 102(3):2595–2604Google Scholar
- DeBusk TA, Ryther JH, Hanisak MD, Williams LD (1981) Effects of seasonality and plant density on the productivity of some freshwater macrophytes. Aquat Bot 10:133–142Google Scholar
- del Rio MJ, Ramazanov Z, García-Reina G (1996) Ulva rigida (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) tank culture as biofilters for dissolved inorganic nitrogen from fishpond effluents. Hydrobiologia 326:61–66Google Scholar
- Gao K, Aruga Y, Asada K, Ishihara T, Akano T, Kiyohara M (1992) Photorespiration and CO2 fixation in the red alga Porphyra yezoensis Ueda. Jpn J Phycol 40:373–377Google Scholar
- Güroy BK, Cirik Ş, Güroy D, Sanver F, Tekinay AA (2007) Effects of Ulva rigida and Cystoseira barbata meals as a feed additive on growth performance, feed utilization, and body composition of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 31:91–97Google Scholar
- Güroy D, Güroy B, Merrifield DL, Ergün S, Tekinay AA, Yiğit M (2011) Effect of dietary Ulva and Spirulina on weight loss and body composition of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), during a starvation period. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 95:320–327Google Scholar
- Little D, Muir J (1987) A guide to integrated warm water aquaculture. Institute of Aquaculture Publication, University of Stirling, p 238Google Scholar
- Magnusson G, Larsson C, Axelsson L (1996) Effects of high CO2 treatment on nitrate and ammonium uptake by Ulva lactuca grown in different nutrient regimes. Sci Mar 60:179–189Google Scholar
- Mata L, Schuenhoff A, Santos R (2010) A direct comparison of the performance of the seaweed biofilters, Asparagopsis armata and Ulva rigida. J Appl Phycol 22:639–644Google Scholar
- Mata L, Santos R, Chapman ARO, Anderson RJ, Vreeland VJ, Davison IR (2003) Cultivation of Ulva rotundata (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) in raceways using semi-intensive fishpond effluents: yield and biofiltration. In: Chapman ARO, Anderson RJ, Vreeland VJ, Davison IR (eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Seaweed Symposium. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, pp 237–242Google Scholar
- Msuya FE, Neori A (2002) Ulva reticulata and Gracilaria crassa: macroalgae that can biofilter effluent from tidal fishponds in Tanzania. Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association (WIOMSA), ZanzibarGoogle Scholar
- Msuya FE, Kyewalyanga MS, Salum D (2006) The performance of the seaweed Ulva reticulata as a biofilter in a low-tech, low-cost, gravity generated water flow regime in Zanzibar, Tanzania. Aquaculture 254:284–292Google Scholar
- Naldi M, Wheeler PA (2002) 15N measurements of ammonium and nitrate uptake by Ulva fenestrata (Chlorophyta) and Gracilaria pacifica (Rhodophyta): comparison of net nutrient disappearance, release of ammonium and nitrate, and 15N accumulation in algal tissue. J Phycol 38:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neori A (1996) The type of N-supply (ammonia or nitrate) determines the performance of seaweed biofilters integrated with intensive fish culture. Isr J Aquac 48:19–27Google Scholar
- Neori A, Msuya FE, Shauli L, Schuenhoff A, Kopel F, Shpigel M (2003) A novel three-stage seaweed (Ulva lactuca) biofilter design for integrated mariculture. J Appl Phycol 15:543–553Google Scholar
- Shpigel M (2015) Land-based integrated multi-trophic Mariculture system. I. In: encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. Springer science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Shpigel M, Neori A, Ben-Ezra D (1998) Ulva lactuca as food source for abalone in a land-based integrated system. J Shellfish Res 17:362–363Google Scholar
- Shpigel M, Ragg NLC, Lupatsch I, Neori A (2000) Protein content determines the nutritional value of the seaweed Ulva lactuca for the abalone Haliotis tuberculata, H. discus hannai and H. fulgens. J Shellfish Res 19:534Google Scholar