Advertisement

Design scenario analysis for porous substrate photobioreactor assemblies

  • Tong Li
  • Björn Podola
  • Larissa K. P. Schultze
  • Michael Melkonian
Article

Abstract

For commercial-scale production of microalgae, in the recent years, biofilm bioreactors have been proven to solve some of major technical problems in this field. Among different approaches, porous substrate photobioreactor (PSBR) is one of the most promising bioreactor types. However, before the actual construction of such a system and application, various design parameters need to be determined. For this purpose, mathematical modeling is considered to be an efficient tool. In the present study, a model for estimating design parameters of PSBRs is proposed. The proposed model estimates the effects of different design parameters on the productivity of PSBR systems based on (1) global solar irradiance data, (2) geographical location of the simulated system, and (3) empirical functions describing the relationship between light intensity on the module surface and module productivity, derived from experimental data. In the present study, to demonstrate the capacity of the proposed model, production of Halochlorella rubescens using a PSBR (Twin-Layer technology) was modeled for various scenarios. Also, simulated production of astaxanthin using Haematococcus pluvialis was performed. The results demonstrated the ability of the proposed model to estimate various design parameters for PSBR systems under various conditions. Based on the prediction made by the proposed model, these parameters can be individually optimized for different geographical locations and/or applications.

Keywords

Phototrophic biofilm Microalgae Photobioreactor PSBR Large-scale cultivation Modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the University of Cologne (KST 158901001).

References

  1. Berner F, Heimann K, Sheehan M (2015) Microalgal biofilms for biomass production. J Appl Phycol 27:1793–1804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duffie JA, Beckman WA (2013) Solar radiation, solar engineering of thermal processes. Wiley, New York, pp 3–42Google Scholar
  3. Erbs DG, Klein SA, Duffie JA (1982) Estimation of the diffuse radiation fraction for hourly, daily and monthly-average global radiation. Sol Energy 28:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gross M, Jarboe D, Wen Z (2015) Biofilm-based algal cultivation systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:5781–5789CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kiperstok AC, Sebestyén P, Podola B, Melkonian M (2017) Biofilm cultivation of Haematococcus pluvialis enables a highly productive one-phase process for astaxanthin production using high light intensities. Algal Res 21:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Li T, Podola B, Melkonian M (2016) Investigating dynamic processes in a porous substrate biofilm photobioreactor—a modeling approach. Algal Res 13:30–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Li T, Strous M, Melkonian M (2017) Biofilm-based photobioreactores: their design and improving productivity through efficient supply of dissolved inorganic carbon. FEMS Microbiol Lett 364(24):fnx218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu T, Wang J, Hu Q, Cheng P, Ji B, Liu J (2013) Attached cultivation technology of microalgae for efficient biomass feedstock production. Bioresour Technol 127:216–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Murphy TE, Berberoglu H (2014) Flux balancing of light and nutrients in a biofilm photobioreactor for maximizing photosynthetic productivity. Biotechnol Prog 30:348–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Naumann T, Çebi Z, Podola B, Melkonian M (2013) Growing microalgae as aquaculture feeds on twin-layers: a novel solid-state photobioreactor. J Appl Phycol 25:1413–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Olivieri G, Salatino P, Marzocchella A (2014) Advances in photobioreactors for intensive microalgal production: configurations, operating strategies and applications. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 89:178–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Panis G, Carreon JR (2016) Commercial astaxanthin production derived by green alga Haematococcus pluvialis: a microalgae process model and a techno-economic assessment all through production line. Algal Res 18:175–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pierobon SC, Cheng X, Graham PJ, Nguyen B, Karakolis EG, Sinton D (2018) Emerging microalgae technology: a review. Sust Energy Fuels 2:13–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Podola B, Li T, Melkonian M (2017) Porous substrate bioreactors: a paradigm shift in microalgal biotechnology? Trends Biotechnol 35:121–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schultze LKP, Simon M-V, Li T, Langenbach D, Podola B, Melkonian M (2015) High light and carbon dioxide optimize surface productivity in a Twin-Layer biofilm photobioreactor. Algal Res 8:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shi J, Podola B, Melkonian M (2014) Application of a prototype-scale Twin-Layer photobioreactor for effective N and P removal from different process stages of municipal wastewater by immobilized microalgae. Bioresour Technol 154:260–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Slegers PM, Wijffels RH, van Straten G, van Boxtel AJB (2011) Design scenarios for flat panel photobioreactors. Appl Energy 88:3342–3353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Slegers PM, van Beveren PJM, Wijffels RH, van Straten G, van Boxtel AJB (2013) Scenario analysis of large scale algae production in tubular photobioreactors. Appl Energy 105:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Strieth D, Ulber R, Muffler K (2018) Application of phototrophic biofilms: from fundamentals to processes. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 41:295–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang J, Liu J, Liu T (2015) The difference in effective light penetration may explain the superiority in photosynthetic efficiency of attached cultivation over the conventional open pond for microalgae. Biotechnol Biofuels 8(1):49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cologne Biocenter, Botanical InstituteUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.Alganovation Co., Ltd.SuzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Algenion GmbHCologneGermany
  4. 4.Zentrum für Material- und KüstenforschungHelmholtz-Zentrum GeesthachtGeesthachtGermany

Personalised recommendations