Variations in morphology, growth, and toxicity among strains of the Prorocentrum lima species complex isolated from Cuba and Brazil
Benthic dinoflagellates belonging to the genus Prorocentrum are known to produce diarrhetic toxins such as okadaic acid (OA) and its analogues, dinophysistoxins (DTXs), as well as prorocentrolides and other unidentified fast-acting toxins. The present study is a comparative analysis focused on the morphology, genetic, growth, toxin production, and toxicity by strains belonging to the Prorocentrum lima species complex, isolated from different regions along the western Atlantic coast. While cell dimensions (38–45 × 24–30 μm) and shape (ovoid) were similar between strains from Cuba and Recife (Northeast Brazil), cells of the strain from the estuarine complex of Paranaguá Bay (South Brazil) were shorter (36–41 × 25–28 μm) and oblong to ovate-oblong (elliptical) in shape. This latter strain exhibited similar LSU rDNA and identical ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 sequences to those of P. cf. lima “morphotype 5,” which is closely related to Prorocentrum caipirignum by LSU, but separated from it by ITS. This southern Brazilian strain attained the highest growth rate (0.34 ± 0.01 div day−1) and cell densities (11.2 × 105 cell mL−1) in batch culture. Intracellular OA concentrations were higher for the other two strains during the late exponential and stationary phase, but similar for all strains (9.50–10.06 pg cell−1) at the early exponential growth phase; consistently lower levels of DTX-1 were produced by two strains, except the one from Recife. Finally, live cells of the strains from Cuba and Recife were more toxic to A. salina metanauplii, whereas the southern Brazilian strain exhibited higher culture medium toxicity. The contrasts in growth and toxicity potential revealed for these morphologically and genetically distinct Prorocentrum strains might be relevant for the local management of diarrhetic poisoning outbreaks in shellfish harvesting and aquaculture sites, including in estuarine areas.
KeywordsDiarrhetic shellfish poisoning Harmful algae Laboratory culture Toxin production Toxicity to Artemia salina
This study was supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) through the Research Contract “Bentox Project,” IAEA RC# 18827. Authors are grateful to CAPES and CNPq (Brazil) for the Ph.D. scholarship awarded to A.R.M.G. through the co-funded PEC-PG Program, to Fundação Araucária (Brazil) for the grant awarded to L.L.M. Ligia F. G. da Luz (Universidade Federal do Paraná) assisted with graphic design, and Mutue T. Fuji (Instituto de Botânica) kindly invited one of the researchers to be part of the sampling campaign in Recife.
- Ben-Gharbia H, Yahia OKD, Amzil Z, Chomérat N, Abadie E, Masseret E, Laabir M (2016) Toxicity and growth assessments of three thermophilic benthic dinoflagellates (Ostreopsis cf. ovata, Prorocentrum lima and Coolia monotis) developing in the southern mediterranean basin. Toxins 8:297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- dos Santos AA, Cocentino AMM, Reis TNV (2006) Macroalgas como indicadoras da qualidade ambiental da praia de Boa Viagem. Bol Téc Cient CEPENE, Tamandaré 14:25–33Google Scholar
- Gayoso A, Dover S, Morton S, Busman M, Moeller P, Fulco V, Maranda L (2002) Diarrhetic shellfish poisoning associated with Prorocentrum lima (Dinophyceae) in Patagonian gulfs (Argentina). J Shellfish Res 21:461–463Google Scholar
- Lawrence JE, Bauder AG, Quilliam MA, Cembella AD (1998) Prorocentrum lima: a putative link to diarrhetic shellfish poisoning in Nova Scotia, Canada. In: Reguera B, Blanco J, Fernandez ML, Wyatt T (eds) Harmful microalgae. Xunta de Galicia and UNESCO, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, pp 78–79Google Scholar
- Moestrup Ø, Akselman R, Cronberg G, Elbraechter M, Fraga S, Halim Y, Hansen G, Hoppenrath M, Larsen J, Lundholm N, Nguyen LN, Zingone A (2009) IOC-UNESCO taxonomic reference list of harmful micro algae. Accessed at http://www.marinespecies. Org/hab (last accessed 20 January 2018)
- Nézan E, Tillmann U, Bilien G l, Boulben S, Chèze K, Zentz F, Salas R, Chomérat N (2012) Taxonomic revision of the dinoflagellate Amphidoma caudata: transfer to the genus Azadinium (Dinophyceae) and proposal of two varieties, based on morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. J Phycol 48:925–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peraza R (2012) Composición y abundancia de dinoflagelados epibentónicos tecados potencialmente tóxicos de la Ensenada Guajimico, región Centro-Sur de Cuba. Bachelor Thesis. Universidad Central Marta Abreu de las VillasGoogle Scholar
- Sobrinho BF, Mafra L (2016) Effects of irradiance and salinity on growth and toxin production by Prorocentrum lima. Proceedings 17th international conference on harmful algae, Oct 3–7 2016, Florianópolis, pp. 149 (Abstract)Google Scholar
- Tindall DR, Morton SL (1998) Community dynamics and physiology of epiphytic/benthic dinoflagellates associated with ciguatera. NATO ASI Series G Ecological Sciences 41:293–314Google Scholar
- Tomas CR, Baden DG (1993) The influence of phosphorus source on the growth and cellular toxin content of the benthic dinoflagellate Prorocentrum lima. In: Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Proc. 5th lnt. Conf. on Toxic Marine Phytoplankton. Elsevier, Amsterdam pp. 565–570Google Scholar