Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 375–387 | Cite as

Microalgal/cyanobacterial biofilm formation on selected surfaces: the effects of surface physicochemical properties and culture media composition

  • Ana C. Barros
  • Ana L. Gonçalves
  • Manuel SimõesEmail author
Article

Abstract

The increased interest in photosynthetic microorganisms for wastewater treatment processes has led to the demand for new biomass harvesting strategies. Biofilm systems have emerged as a good alternative to planktonic photosynthetic cultures. However, knowledge on the environmental aspects influencing microalgal/cyanobacterial biofilm formation is required. This study reports the influence of: (i) surface physicochemical properties of selected microorganisms (Chlorella vulgaris, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Synechocystis salina, and Microcystis aeruginosa) and materials (copper—Cu; glass—G; poly(methyl methacrylate)—PMMA; polystyrene—PS; polyvinyl chloride—PVC; and AISI316 stainless steel—SS) and (ii) culture media composition (glucose-deficient and glucose-enriched media) on biofilm formation (up to 7 days), with constant temperature, light irradiation, and shaking conditions. Adhesion was assessed through thermodynamic prediction of adhesion and by in vitro adhesion assays on microtiter plates. In general, higher biofilm densities were observed after 7 days of experiment, and followed the order: SS > PS > G > PVC > PMMA> Cu. M. aeruginosa was the highest biofilm-former microorganism (2.1 × 106 CFU cm−2), while P. subcapitata has shown lack of ability to adhere. Moreover, the higher biofilm formation ability was observed when glucose-deficient medium was used. Furthermore, the present results pointed out that the thermodynamic approach failed to predict the stochasticity of microalgal/cyanobacterial adhesion. In light of these findings, others factors must be considered when using predictive tools. Therefore, fine-tuning on photosynthetic biofilm formation can be obtained by optimizing the bulk fluid composition and the type of surface. In conclusion, the results show the potential of the selected microalgae/cyanobacteria for biofilm-based technology.

Keywords

Adhesion Biofilms Cyanobacteria Media composition Microalgae Surface physicochemical properties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was the result of the projects: POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030219; POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006939 (Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy - UID/EQU/00511/2013) funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), through COMPETE2020 – Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by national funds, through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000005 - LEPABE-2-ECO-INNOVATION, supported by North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (NORTE 2020), under the Portugal 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); SFRH/BD/88799/2012; 0302_CVMAR_I_1_P..

References

  1. Abdel-Raouf N, Al-Homaidan A, Ibraheem I (2012) Microalgae and wastewater treatment. Saudi J Biol Sci 19:257–275PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Adey WH (1982) Algal turf scrubber. US patent 4333263Google Scholar
  3. Aslan S, Kapdan IK (2006) Batch kinetics of nitrogen and phosphorus removal from synthetic wastewater by algae. Ecol Eng 28:64–70Google Scholar
  4. Babu M (2011) Effect of algal biofilm and operational conditions on nitrogen removal in waste stabilization ponds. Dissertation, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water EducationGoogle Scholar
  5. Barros AI, Gonçalves AL, Simões M, Pires JC (2015) Harvesting techniques applied to microalgae: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:1489–1500Google Scholar
  6. Becker K (1996) Exopolysaccharide production and attachment strength of bacteria and diatoms on substrates with different surface tensions. Microbiol Ecol 32:23–33Google Scholar
  7. Bischoff HW, Bold HC (1963) Phycological studies IV. Some soil algae from Enchanted Rock and related algal species. University of Texas Publication 6318:1–95Google Scholar
  8. Boelee N, Temmink H, Janssen M, Buisman C, Wijffels R (2011) Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from municipal wastewater effluent using microalgal biofilms. Water Res 45:5925–5933Google Scholar
  9. Booth C (1971) Methods in microbiology. Academic Press Inc, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bridier A, Briandet R, Bouchez T, Jabot F (2014) A model-based approach to detect interspecific interactions during biofilm development. Biofouling 30:761–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Busscher HJ, Weerkamp AH, van der Mei HC, Van Pelt A, de Jong HP, Arends J (1984) Measurement of the surface free energy of bacterial cell surfaces and its relevance for adhesion. Appl and Environ Microbiol 48:980–983Google Scholar
  12. Cai T, Park SY, Li Y (2013) Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams by microalgae: status and prospects. Renew Sust Energ Rev 19:360–369Google Scholar
  13. Carvalho AP, Meireles LA, Malcata FX (2006) Microalgal reactors: a review of enclosed system designs and performances. Biotechnol Prog 22:1490–1506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chae MS, Schraft H, Hansen LT, Mackereth R (2006) Effects of physicochemical surface characteristics of Listeria monocytogenes strains on attachment to glass. Food Microbiol 23:250–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Characklis WG (1990) Biofilm processes. In: Characklis WG (ed) Biofilms. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 195–231Google Scholar
  16. Chaves LC 2004. Estudo da cinética de formação de biofilmes em superfícies em contato com água potável. Dissertation, University of MinhoGoogle Scholar
  17. Christenson L (2011) Algal biofilm production and harvesting system for wastewater treatment with biofuels by-products. Dissertation, Utah State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. Christenson L, Sims R (2011) Production and harvesting of microalgae for wastewater treatment, biofuels, and bioproducts. Biotechnol Adv 29:686–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Costas E, Lopez-Rodas V (2006) Copper sulphate and DCMU-herbicide treatments increase asymmetry between sister cells in the toxic cyanobacteria Microcystis aeruginosa: implications for detecting environmental stress. Water Res 40:2447–2451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Del Campo JA, García-González M, Guerrero MG (2007) Outdoor cultivation of microalgae for carotenoid production: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:1163–1174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Di Pippo F, Bohn A, Congestri R, De Philippis R, Albertano P (2009) Capsular polysaccharides of cultured phototrophic biofilms. Biofouling 25:495–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Donlan RM (2002) Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis J 8:881–890Google Scholar
  23. Doyle RJ (2000) Contribution of the hydrophobic effect to microbial infection. Microbes Infect 2:391–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fields MW, Hise A, Lohman EJ, Bell T, Gardner RD, Corredor L, Moll K, Peyton BM, Characklis GW, Gerlach R (2014) Sources and resources: importance of nutrients, resource allocation, and ecology in microalgal cultivation for lipid accumulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:4805–4816PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Gebara F (1999) Activated sludge biofilm wastewater treatment system. Water Res 33:230–238Google Scholar
  26. Gomes L, Moreira J, Miranda J, Simões M, Melo L, Mergulhão F (2013) Macroscale versus microscale methods for physiological analysis of biofilms formed in 96-well microtiter plates. J Microbiol Meth 95:342–349Google Scholar
  27. Gonçalves AL, Ferreira C, Loureiro JA, Pires JCM, Simões M (2015) Surface physicochemical properties of selected single and mixed cultures of microalgae and cyanobacteria and their relationship with sedimentation kinetics. Bioresour Bioprocess 2:1–10Google Scholar
  28. Grass G, Rensing C, Solioz M (2011) Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:1541–1547PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gregor J, Jančula D, Maršálek B (2008) Growth assays with mixed cultures of cyanobacteria and algae assessed by in vivo fluorescence: one step closer to real ecosystems? Chemosphere 70:1873–1878PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gross MA (2015) Development and optimization of biofilm based algal cultivation. Dissertation, Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  31. Gross M, Zhao X, Mascarenhas V, Wen Z (2016) Effects of the surface physico-chemical properties and the surface textures on the initial colonization and the attached growth in algal biofilm. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:1Google Scholar
  32. Hadjoudja S, Deluchat V, Baudu M (2010) Cell surface characterisation of Microcystis aeruginosa and Chlorella vulgaris. J Colloid Interf Sci 342:293–299Google Scholar
  33. Hill WR, Ryon MG, Schilling EM (1995) Light limitation in a stream ecosystem: responses by primary producers and consumers. Ecology 76:1297–1309Google Scholar
  34. Hodoki Y (2005) Bacteria biofilm encourages algal immigration onto substrata in lotic systems. Hydrobiologia 539:27–34Google Scholar
  35. Holland R, Dugdale T, Wetherbee R, Brennan A, Finlay J, Callow J, Callow ME (2004) Adhesion and motility of fouling diatoms on a silicone elastomer. Biofouling 20:323–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Horn H, Reiff H, Morgenroth E (2003) Simulation of growth and detachment in biofilm systems under defined hydrodynamic conditions. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:607–617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Irving TE (2011) Factors influencing the formation and development of microalgal Biofilms Dissertation, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  38. Irving TE, Allen DG (2011) Species and material considerations in the formation and development of microalgal biofilms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:283–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ista L (2011) Substratum interfacial energetic effects on the attachment of marine bacteria. Dissertation, The University of New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  40. Ista LK, López GP (2013) Thermodynamic analysis of marine bacterial attachment to oligo (ethylene glycol)-terminated self-assembled monolayers. Biointerphases 8:24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Jamers A, Blust R, De Coen W, Griffin JL, Jones OA (2013) Copper toxicity in the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: an integrated approach. Biometals 26:731–740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Janczuk B, Chibowski E, Bruque J, Kerkeb M, Caballero FG (1993) On the consistency of surface free energy components as calculated from contact angles of different liquids: an application to the cholesterol surface. J Colloid Interf Sci 159:421–428Google Scholar
  43. Jensen KR (1996) Apparatus for water purification by culturing and harvesting attached algal communities US patent 5527456Google Scholar
  44. Johnson MB, Wen Z (2010) Development of an attached microalgal growth system for biofuel production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:525–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Katarzyna L, Sai G, Singh OA (2015) Non-enclosure methods for non-suspended microalgae cultivation: literature review and research needs. Renew Sust Energ Rev 42:1418–1427Google Scholar
  46. Kesaano M, Sims RC (2014) Algal biofilm based technology for wastewater treatment. Algal Res 5:231–240Google Scholar
  47. Kesaano M, Gardner RD, Moll K, Lauchnor E, Gerlach R, Peyton BM, Sims RC (2015) Dissolved inorganic carbon enhanced growth, nutrient uptake, and lipid accumulation in wastewater grown microalgal biofilms. Bioresour Technol 180:7–15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kim YB, Jeong SH, Park JW (2013) Adsorption characteristics of microalgae on surface-modified photobioreactor system. J Biobased Mater Biol 7:80–84Google Scholar
  49. Knauss W, Schapery RA (1999) Recent advances in fracture mechanics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  50. Kokare C, Chakraborty S, Khopade A, Mahadik K (2009) Biofilm: importance and applications. Indian J Biotechnol 8:159–168Google Scholar
  51. Korber DR, Lawrence JR, Lappin-Scott HM, Costerton JW (2003) Growth of microorganisms on surfaces. In: Lappin-Scott HM, Costerton JW (eds.) Microbial biofilms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK p. 15–45Google Scholar
  52. Latała A, Nędzi M, Stepnowski P (2009) Toxicity of imidazolium and pyridinium based ionic liquids towards algae. Chlorella vulgaris, Oocystis submarina (green algae) and Cyclotella meneghiniana, Skeletonema marinoi (diatoms). Green Chem 11:580–588Google Scholar
  53. Leale J (1998) Effects of copper sulfate on benthic algae: a laboratory experiment. McNair Schol J 2:46–51Google Scholar
  54. Levy JL, Stauber JL, Jolley DF (2007) Sensitivity of marine microalgae to copper: the effect of biotic factors on copper adsorption and toxicity. Sci Tot Environ 387:141–154Google Scholar
  55. Li B, Logan BE (2004) Bacterial adhesion to glass and metal-oxide surfaces. Colloids Surf B 36:81–90Google Scholar
  56. Li Y, Gao YH, Li XS, Yang JY, Que GH (2010) Influence of surface free energy on the adhesion of marine benthic diatom Nitzschia closterium MMDL533. Colloids and Surfaces B 75:550–556Google Scholar
  57. Liehr SK, Suidan MT, Eheart JW (1990) A modeling study of carbon and light limitation in algal biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 35:233–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Lombardi AT, Hidalgo TMR, Vieira AAH, Sartori AL (2007) Toxicity of ionic copper to the freshwater microalga Scenedesmus acuminatus (Chlorophyceae, Chlorococcales). Phycologia 46:74–78Google Scholar
  59. Lopes F, Morin P, Oliveira R, Melo L (2005) The influence of nickel on the adhesion ability of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Colloids Surf B 46:127–133Google Scholar
  60. Mallick N (2002) Biotechnological potential of immobilized algae for wastewater N, P and metal removal: a review. Biometals 15:377–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Meireles A, Machado I, Fulgêncio R, Mergulhão F, Melo L, Simões M (2015) Efficacy of antimicrobial combinations to reduce the use of sodium hypochlorite in the control of planktonic and sessile Escherichia coli. Biochem Eng J 105:115–122Google Scholar
  62. Memon AR, Andresen J, Habib M, Jaffar M (2014) Simulated sugar factory wastewater remediation kinetics using algal-bacterial raceway reactor promoted by polyacrylate polyalcohol. Bioresour Technol 157:37–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Menicucci Jr JA (2010) Algal biofilms, microbial fuel cells, and implementation of state-of-the-art research into chemical and Biol Eng laboratories. Dissertation, Montana State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  64. Milledge JJ, Heaven S (2013) A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 12:165–178Google Scholar
  65. Moreira-Santos M, Soares AM, Ribeiro R (2004) An in situ bioassay for freshwater environments with the microalga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Ecotox Environ Saf 59:164–173Google Scholar
  66. Morra M, Cassinelli C (1998) Bacterial adhesion to polymer surfaces: a critical review of surface thermodynamic approaches. J Biomat Sci-Polym E 9:55–74Google Scholar
  67. Mulbry WW, Wilkie AC (2001) Growth of benthic freshwater algae on dairy manures. J Appl Phycol 13:301–306Google Scholar
  68. Mulbry W, Westhead EK, Pizarro C, Sikora L (2005) Recycling of manure nutrients: use of algal biomass from dairy manure treatment as a slow release fertilizer. Bioresour Technol 96:451–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Muñoz R, Köllner C, Guieysse B (2009) Biofilm photobioreactors for the treatment of industrial wastewaters. J Hazard Mater 161:29–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. OECD (2011) Test No. 201: freshwater alga and cyanobacteria, growth inhibition test: organisation for economic co-operation and developmentGoogle Scholar
  71. Oliveira R, Azeredo J, Teixeira P, Fonseca A (2001) The role of hydrophobicity in bacterial adhesion. BioLine 1:11–22Google Scholar
  72. Ozkan A (2012) Development of a novel algae biofilm photobioreactor for biofuel production. Dissertation, University of TexasGoogle Scholar
  73. Ozkan A, Berberoglu H (2011) Adhesion of Chlorella vulgaris on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. In: ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Denver, Colorado, pp 169–178Google Scholar
  74. Ozkan A, Berberoglu H (2013a) Adhesion of algal cells to surfaces. Biofouling 29:469–482PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Ozkan A, Berberoglu H (2013b) Cell to substratum and cell to cell interactions of microalgae. Colloids Surf B 112:302–309Google Scholar
  76. Ozkan A, Berberoglu H (2013c) Physico-chemical surface properties of microalgae. Colloids Surf B 112:287–293Google Scholar
  77. Priyadarshani I, Rath B (2012) Commercial and industrial applications of microalgae—a review. J Algal Biomass Utln 3:89–100Google Scholar
  78. Reed R, Reed G (1948) “Drop plate” method of counting viable bacteria. Can J Res E 26:317–326Google Scholar
  79. Ruiz J, Álvarez P, Arbib Z, Garrido C, Barragán J, Perales J (2011) Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus concentration on their removal kinetic in treated urban wastewater by Chlorella vulgaris. Int J Phytoremediat 13:884–896Google Scholar
  80. Schumacher G, Blume T, Sekoulov I (2003) Bacteria reduction and nutrient removal in small wastewater treatment plants by an algal biofilm. Water Sci Technol 47:195–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Sekar R, Nair K, Rao V, Venugopalan V (2002) Nutrient dynamics and successional changes in a lentic freshwater biofilm. Freshw Biol 47:1893–1907Google Scholar
  82. Sekar R, Venugopalan V, Satpathy K, Nair K, Rao V (2004) Laboratory studies on adhesion of microalgae to hard substrates. Hydrobiologia 512:109–116Google Scholar
  83. Shen Y, Zhang H, Xu X, Lin X (2015) Biofilm formation and lipid accumulation of attached culture of Botryococcus braunii. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38:481–488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Simões LC, Simões M, Oliveira R, Vieira MJ (2007) Potential of the adhesion of bacteria isolated from drinking water to materials. J Basic Microb 47:174–183Google Scholar
  85. Simões M, Simões LC, Cleto S, Pereira MO, Vieira MJ (2008) The effects of a biocide and a surfactant on the detachment of Pseudomonas fluorescens from glass surfaces. Int J Food Microbiol 121:335–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Simões LC, Simoes M, Vieira MJ (2010) Adhesion and biofilm formation on polystyrene by drinking water-isolated bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 98:317–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Sinde E, Carballo J (2000) Attachment of Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes to stainless steel, rubber and polytetrafluorethylene: the influence of free energy and the effect of commercial sanitizers. Food Microbiol 17:439–447Google Scholar
  88. Singh S, Kate BN, Banerjee U (2005) Bioactive compounds from cyanobacteria and microalgae: an overview. Cr Rev Biotechn 25:73–95Google Scholar
  89. Sirmerova M, Prochazkova G, Siristova L, Kolska Z, Branyik T (2013) Adhesion of Chlorella vulgaris to solid surfaces, as mediated by physicochemical interactions. J Appl Phycol 25:1687–1695Google Scholar
  90. Spolaore P, Joannis-Cassan C, Duran E, Isambert A (2006) Commercial applications of microalgae. J Biosci Bioeng 101:87–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Stanley MS, Callow JA (2007) Whole cell adhesion strength of morphotypes and isolates of Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bacillariophyceae). Eur J Phycol 42:191–197Google Scholar
  92. Stauber J, Florence T (1987) Mechanism of toxicity of ionic copper and copper complexes to algae. Mar Biol 94:511–519Google Scholar
  93. Stewart EA, Zivojnovich MJ (2003) Apparatus and method for harvesting and collecting attached algal communities. US patent 6572770B1Google Scholar
  94. Teixeira P, Oliveira R (1999) Influence of surface characteristics on the adhesion of Alcaligenes denitrificans to polymeric substrates. J Adhes Sci Technol 13:1287–1294Google Scholar
  95. Teixeira P, Lopes Z, Azeredo J, Oliveira R, Vieira MJ (2005) Physico-chemical surface characterization of a bacterial population isolated from a milking machine. Food Microbiol 22:247–251Google Scholar
  96. Trevors J, Cotter C (1990) Copper toxicity and uptake in microorganisms. J Ind Microbiol 6:77–84Google Scholar
  97. Van Leeuwen HP (1999) Metal speciation dynamics and bioavailability: inert and labile complexes. Environ Sci Technol 33:3743–3748Google Scholar
  98. Van Oss C (1995) Hydrophobicity of biosurfaces - origin, quantitative determination and interaction energies. Colloids Surf B 5:91–110Google Scholar
  99. Van Oss C (2005) Interfacial forces in aqueous media. Marcel Decker Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  100. Van Oss CJ (2006) Interfacial forces in aqueous media. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  101. Van Oss C, Chaudhury M, Good R (1987) Monopolar surfaces. Adv Colloid Interfac 28:35–64Google Scholar
  102. Van Oss C, Good R, Chaudhury M (1988) Additive and nonadditive surface tension components and the interpretation of contact angles. Langmuir 4:884–891Google Scholar
  103. Van Oss C, Ju L, Chaudhury M, Good R (1989) Estimation of the polar parameters of the surface tension of liquids by contact angle measurements on gels. J Colloid Int Sci 128:313–319Google Scholar
  104. Visser J (1995) Particle adhesion and removal: a review. Particul Sci Technol 13:169–196Google Scholar
  105. Wang M, Kuo-Dahab WC, Dolan S, Park C (2014) Kinetics of nutrient removal and expression of extracellular polymeric substances of the microalgae, Chlorella sp. and Micractinium sp., in wastewater treatment. BioresourTechnol 154:131–137Google Scholar
  106. Wilkie AC, Mulbry WW (2002) Recovery of dairy manure nutrients by benthic freshwater algae. Bioresour Technol 84:81–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Wilson S, Hamilton MA, Hamilton GC, Schumann MR, Stoodley P (2004) Statistical quantification of detachment rates and size distributions of cell clumps from wild-type (PAO1) and cell signaling mutant (JP1) Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5847–5852PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  108. Wuertz S, Bishop PL, Wilderer PA (2003) Biofilms in wastewater treatment: an interdisciplinary approach. IWA Publishing London, UKGoogle Scholar
  109. Wurdack ME (1923) Chemical composition of the walls of certain algae. Ohio J Sci 28:181–191Google Scholar
  110. Yang Y, Gao K (2003) Effects of CO2 concentrations on the freshwater microalgae, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Chlorella pyrenoidosa and Scenedesmus obliquus (Chlorophyta). J Appl Phycol 15:379–389Google Scholar
  111. Zhang T, Fang HH (2001) Quantification of extracellular polymeric substances in biofilms by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Biotechnol Lett 23:405–409Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LEPABE, Departamento de Engenharia Química, Faculdade de EngenhariaUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations