Microalgal bioremediation of petroleum-derived low salinity and low pH produced water
Due to the presence of toxic organic compounds and heavy metals, it is essential to treat the produced water before reuse or discharge to the environment. In this study, produced water sample was collected from a local petroleum company. The sample had the following characteristics: pH: 4.17, total organic carbon (TOC): 720 ppm, total nitrogen (TN): 52.5 ppm, total phosphorus (TP): 0.21 ppm and salinity of 4.3 ppt. As a pretreatment, NaOH was added to raise the pH to 7.1 which removed 40% TOC, 38.3% TN, and 19% of TP. The growth viability of six microalgae strains (three freshwater and three marine) in the pretreated produced water (PPW) were studied in two conditions: (1) without additional nutrients and (2) with N and P supplementation. Out of these strains, only Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. were able to grow in both experiments. Chlorella sp. had the maximum biomass density on both occasions; it produced 1.2-g L−1 biomass density in the nutrient-supplemented PPW. Next, Chlorella sp. was grown in 1 L PBR to study the contaminant removal efficiencies. After 15 days of growth Chlorella sp. could remove 92% of the TN and 73% of the TOC from the PPW. Fish bio-assay was conducted using raw, pretreated, and biotreated produced water. Results indicate that the bioremediation process greatly reduced the toxicity of the produced water. Furthermore, the bioremediation process simultaneously generated 1.72 g L−1 biomass. Therefore, microalgal bioremediation of produced water provides an opportunity to produce a large quantity of biomass that can be used as feedstock for many products.
KeywordsMicroalgae Produced water Oil and gas industry Bioremediation Toxicity
This work was supported by Qatar Science and Technology Park (QSTP) of Qatar Foundation (QF), Qatar Airways (QA) and Qatar University (QU). We also acknowledge the support from Ms. Noora Mahmood Aljathelah of Environmental Science Center for the GC-MS analysis and Ms. Sherin Abdelfatah Mohamed Ahmed of Central Chemistry Lab for assisting in the ICP-MS analysis.
- Ahan J (2014) Characterization of produced water from two offshore oil fields in Qatar. http://qspace.qu.edu.qa/bitstream/handle/10576/3287/Ahan,%20Jumana%20Ahmad.pdf?sequence=1
- Brown JJ, Das P, Al-Saidi M (2018) Sustainable agriculture in the Arabian/Persian gulf region utilizing marginal water resources: making the best of a bad situation. Sustainability 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051364
- Hamoda MF (2006) Air pollutants emissions from waste treatment and disposal facilities. J Environ Sci Health A 41:77–85Google Scholar
- Lichtenthaler HK, Buschmann C (2001) Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Curr Protoc Food Anal Chem F F4:F4.3Google Scholar
- Longo S, d’Antoni BM, Bongards M, Chaparro A, Cronrath A, Fatone F, Lema JM, Mauricio-Iglesias M, Soares A, Hospido A (2016) Monitoring and diagnosis of energy consumption in wastewater treatment plants. A state of the art and proposals for improvement. Appl Energy 179:1251–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Luther M (1990) Degradation of different substituted aromatic compounds as nutrient sources by the green alga Scenedesmus obliquus. Dechema Biotechnology Conference 4. pp 613–615Google Scholar
- Rawat I, Gupta SK, Shriwastav A, Singh P, Kumari S, Bux F (2016) Microalgae applications in wastewater treatment. In: Bux F, Chisti Y (eds) Algae Biotechnology: Products and Processes. Springer International, Cham, pp 249–268Google Scholar
- Tao R, Kinnunen V, Praveenkumar R, Lakaniemi A-M, Rintala JA (2017) Comparison of Scenedesmus acuminatus and Chlorella vulgaris cultivation in liquid digestates from anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper industry and municipal wastewater treatment sludge. J Appl Phycol 29:2845–2856CrossRefGoogle Scholar