Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 3413–3423 | Cite as

Epiphytism differences in the commercial species of Gracilaria, G. fisheri, G. tenuistipitata, and G. salicornia, from Thailand

  • Anong Chirapart
  • Jantana Praiboon
  • Kangsadan Boonprab
  • Pongsatorn Puangsombat
8th Asian Pacific Phycological Forum

Abstract

Epiphytism is a common phenomenon in seaweeds that can be observed in natural populations and under culture conditions. Epiphytes are generally attached superficially to the surface of the host. Some epiphytic species can penetrate into the tissue of the host, affecting its growth and productivity. This study was done to examine epiphytism in three Gracilaria species: G. fisheri, G. salicornia, and G. tenuistipitata. Sampling of natural and cultured populations was conducted at seven sites. The samples were examined using a light microscope (LM) and scanning electron microscope (SEM). In this study, the epiphytic algae found were mainly cyanobacteria (Lyngbya), Chlorophyceae (Cladophora and Ulva), Phaeophyceae (Padina), and Rhodophyceae (Ceramium, Hypnea, and Polysiphonia). Lyngbya majuscula had the highest density in G. fisheri (14.56 epiphytes cm−2; 40% host−1). A high density of Polysiphonia scopulorum (1.16 epiphytes cm−2; 30% host−1) was found on the G. fisheri plants. In addition, Cladophora species were found on all the Gracilaria species, particularly on G. salicornia plants (4.04 epiphytes cm−2; 43.33% host−1). G. salicornia plants were frequently dominated by Hypnea hamulosa (2.94 epiphytes cm−2; 40% host−1). In contrast, a small number of epiphytes were found on G. tenuistipitata compared with the other two species. The SEM micrographs revealed epiphytic attachment to the host and the extent that epiphytes penetrated the host tissues. Our study showed that G. fisheri and G. salicornia had a greater degree of susceptibility to epiphytes than G. tenuistipitata.

Keywords

Epiphytes Agarophyte Gracilarioid Thai seaweeds 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute. Special thanks to anonymous reviewers whose remarks helped to improve this paper.

References

  1. Abbott IA, Huisman JM (2004) Marine green and brown algae of the Hawaiian Islands Bishop Museum Bulletin in Botany 4. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, Hawaii. 259 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Alcantara LB, Calumpong HP, Martinez-Goss MR, Meñez EG, Israel A (1999) Comparison of the performance of the agarophyte, Gracilariopsis bailinae, and the milkfish, Chanos chanos, in mono-and biculture. Hydrobiologia 398(399):443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA, AWWA, WPCF (1980) Standard method for the examination of water and waste water, 15th ed. APHA. American Publication Health Association, American Water. Works Association & Water Pollution Control Federation. Washinton D.C. 1134 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Bjærke MR, Fredriksen S (2003) Epiphytic macroalgae on the introduced brown seaweed Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt (Phaeophyceae) in Norway. Sarsia 88:353–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brawley SH, Xiugeng F (1988) Ecological studies of Gracilaria asiatica and Gracilaria lemaneiformis in Zhanshan Bay, Qingdao. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 6:22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buschmann AH, Gómez P (1993) Interaction mechanisms between Gracilaria chilensis (Rhodophyta) and epiphytes. Hydrobiologia 260(261):345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buschmann AH, Hernández-González MC, Varela D (2008) Seaweed future cultivation in Chile: perspectives and challenges. Int J Environ Pollut 33:432–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chirapart A (2008) A review of the Gracilaria (sensu latu) from Thailand. In: Phang SM, Lewmanomont K, Lim PE (eds) Taxonomy of Southeast Asian Seaweeds. Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Monograph Series 2, pp. 45–61.Google Scholar
  9. Chirapart A, Lewmanomont K (2004) Growth and production of the Thai agarophyte cultured using the effluent seawater from shrimp culture. Hydrobiologia 512:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coppejans E, Prathep A, Leliaert F, Lewmanomont K, De Clerck O (2010) Seaweeds of Mu Ko Tha Lae Tai (SE Thailand): methodologies and field guide to the dominant species. Biodiversity Research and Training Program (BRT), Bangkok. 274 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Critchley AT, Largo D, Wee W, Lhonneur GB, Hurtado AQ, Schubert J (2004) A preliminary summary on Kappaphycus farming and the impact of epiphytes. Jpn J Phycol 52(Suppl):231–232Google Scholar
  12. Dawes CJ, Teasdale BW, Friedlander M (2000) Cell wall structure of the agarophytes Gracilaria tikvahiae and G. cornea (Rhodophyta) and penetration by the epiphyte Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta). J Appl Phycol 12:567–575Google Scholar
  13. Desikachary TV (1959) Cyanophyta. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Dehli. 686 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Diez YLG, Jover AC, Suárez AMA, Gómez LML, Fujii MT (2013) Distribution of epiphytic macroalgae on the thalli of their hosts in Cuba. Acta Bot Bras 27:815–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans LV (1981) Marine algae and fouling: a review, with particular reference to ship fouling. Bot Mar 24:167–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher RL (1995) Epiphytism and fouling in Gracilaria cultivation: an overview. J Appl Phycol 7:225–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedlander M (1991) Growth rate, epiphyte biomass and agar yield of Gracilaria conferta in an annual outdoor experiment. 1. Irradiance and nitrogen. Bioresour Technol 38:203–208Google Scholar
  18. Friedlander M (1992) Gracilaria conferta and its epiphytes: the effect of culture conditions on growth. Bot Mar 35:423–428Google Scholar
  19. Friedlander M, Ben-Amotz A (1991) The effect of outdoor culture conditions on growth and epiphytes of Gracilaria conferta. Aquat Bot 39:315–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedlander M, Krom MD, Ben-Amotz A (1991) The effect of light and ammonium on growth, epiphytes and chemical constituents of Gracilaria conferta in outdoor cultures. Bot Mar 34:161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedlander M, Kashman Y, Weinberger F, Dawes CJ (2001) Gracilaria and its epiphytes: 4. The response of two Gracilaria species to Ulva lactuca in a bacteria-limited environment. J Appl Phycol 13:501–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ganesan M, Selvaraj K, Chithra K, Sirajudeen S (2015) Epiphytism differences in Gelidiella acerosa cultivated with floating rafts and concrete blocks. J Appl Phycol 27:399–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. González MA, Barrales HL, Candia A, Cid L (1993) Spatial and temporal distribution of dominant epiphytes on Gracilaria from a natural subtidal bed in central-southern Chile. Aquaculture 116:135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hays CG (2005) Effect of nutrient availability, grazer assemblage and seagrass source population on the interaction between Thalassia testudinum (turtle grass) and its algal epiphytes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 314:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho Pham-Hoang (1969) Rong bien Vietnam: marine algae of South Vietnam. Ministry of Education and Youth, Trung-Tam Hoc-Liew Xuat-Btan, Saigon. 557 pp. (in Vietnamese).Google Scholar
  26. Hurtado AQ, Critchley AT (2006) Seaweed industry of the Philippines and the problem of epiphytism in Kappaphycus farming. In: Phang SM, Critchley A, Ang PO (eds) Advances in seaweed cultivation and utilization in Asia. University of Malaya Maritime Research Centre, Kuala Lumpur pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
  27. Hurtado AQ, Critchley AT, Trespoey A, Bleicher-Lhonneur G (2006) Occurrence of Polysiphonia epiphytes in Kappaphycus farms at Calaguas Is., Camarines Norte, Phillippines. J Appl Phycol 18:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jennings JG, Steinberg PD (1997) Phlorotannins versus other factors affecting epiphyte abundance on the kelp Ecklonia radiata. Oecologia 109:461–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones E, Thornber CS (2010) Effects of habitat-modifying invasive macroalgae on epiphytic algal communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 400:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim JK, Yarish C (2014) Development of a sustainable land-based Gracilaria cultivation system. Algae 29:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leonardi PI, Miravalles AB, Faugeron S, Verónica F, Beltrán J, Correa JA (2006) Diversity, phenomenology and epidemiology of epiphytism in farmed Gracilaria chilensis (Rhodophyta) in northern Chile. Eur J Phycol 41:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levin PS, Mathieson AC (1991) Variation in a host-epiphyte relationship along a wave exposure gradient. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 77:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Michael TS, Shin HW, Hanna R, Spafford DC (2008) A review of epiphyte community development: surface interactions and settlement on seagrass. J Environ Biol 29:629–638PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Muñoz J, Fotedar R (2010) Epiphytism of Gracilaria cliftonii (Withell, Millar & Kraft) from Western Australia. J Appl Phycol 22:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nakajima N, Ohki K, Kamiya M (2015) Defense mechanisms of sargassacean species against the epiphytic red alga Neosiphonia harveyi. J Phycol 51:695–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakajima N, Sugimoto N, Ohki K, Kamiya M (2016) Diversity of phlorotannin profiles among sargassasacean species affecting variation and abundance of epiphytes. Eur J Phycol 51:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pearson GA, Evans LV (1990) Settlement and survival of Polysiphonia lanosa (Ceramiales) spores on Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus (Fucales). J Phycol 26:597–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Poza AM, Gauna MC, Escobar JF, Parodi ER (2018) Temporal dynamics of algal epiphytes on Leathesia marina and Colpomenia sinuosa macrothalli (Phaeophyceae). Mar Biol Res 14:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Salles JP, Scherner F, Yoshimura CY, Fanganiello M, Bouzon ZL, Horta PA (2010) Cultivation of native seaweed Gracilaria domingensis (Rhodophyta) in southern Brazil. Braz Arch Biol Technol 53:633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Strickland JDH, Parsons TR (1972) A Practical Handbook of Sea Water Analysis, 2nd ed. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin No. 167, Ottawa. 310 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Vairappan CS (2006) Seasonal occurrences of epiphytic algae on the commercially cultivated red alga Kappaphycus alvarezii (Solieriaceae, Gigartinales, Rhodophyta). J Appl Phycol 18:611–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vairappan CS, Chung CS, Hurtado AQ, Soya FE, Bleicher-Lhonneur G, Critchley A (2007) Distribution and symptom of epiphyte infection in major carrageenophyte-producing farms. J Appl Phycol 20:27–33Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Algal Bioresources Research Center, Department of Fishery Biology, Faculty of FisheriesKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Department of Fishery Product, Faculty of FisheriesKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations