Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 355–363 | Cite as

The environmental feasibility of low-cost algae-based sewage treatment as a climate change adaption measure in rural areas of SADC countries

  • Paul J. Oberholster
  • Po-Hsun ChengEmail author
  • B. Genthe
  • M. Steyn


Employing specific algae treatment to treat municipal domestic wastewater effluent presents an alternative practice to improving water quality effluent of existing rural pond systems in Southern Africa. In the present study, domestic wastewater was treated by using existing infrastructure and inoculated specific selected algae strains in a pond system treatment plant. The objective was to determine through a field pilot study if algae nutrient treatment efficiencies in current traditional water-stabilisation ponds can be optimised by manipulating the existing natural consortium of algae through mass inoculation of specific algae strains of Chlorella spp. The reduction of total phosphorus in the unfiltered water (contain algae) after specific algae treatment was 74.7 and 76.4% for water-stabilisation ponds 5 and 6, while total nitrogen removal was 43.1 and 35.1%, respectively. Chlorella protothecoides was the dominant algal species in ponds 4, 5 and 6 after specific algae treatment. The maximum algae abundance (4.6 × 106 cells mL−1 in pond 4 and 6.1 × 106 cells mL−1 in pond 5) were observed in August 2016, while the maximum chlorophyll-a concentration of 783 μg L−1 was measured in pond 5 after 2 months of specific algae inoculation. Although the present study showed that inoculation of specific algal strains can potentially enhance the treatment efficiencies of existing rural domestic sewage pond systems, it was also evident from the algae-treated effluent analysis that the algae biomass in the upper surface water layer must be harvested for maximum treatment results.


Phycoremediation Temperature Phosphorus harvesting Rural Water-stabilisation ponds 



The authors express their gratitude to the African Development Bank [ACTC-WA1] and the Department of Science and Technology of South Africa for funding the project. The authors also thank the unknown referees for their critical review of and constructive suggestions toward improving the manuscript.


  1. Abdel-Raouf N, Al-Homaidan, Ibraheem IBM (2012) Microalgae and wastewater treatment. Saudi J Biol Sci 19:257–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abinandan S, Shanthakumar S (2015) Challenges and opportunities in application of microalgae (Chlorophyta) for wastewater treatment: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:123–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Achara N (2012) Biofuel from algae. J Am Sci 8:240–422Google Scholar
  4. Acien FG, Gomez-Serrano C, Morales-Amaral M, Fernandez-Sevilla JM, Molina-Grim E (2016) Wastewater treatment using microalgae: how realistic a contribution might it be to significant urban wastewater treatment? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:9013–9022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. APHA (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Barthel L, Oliveira PAV, da Costa RHR (2008) Plankton biomass in secondary ponds treating piggery waste. Braz Arch Biol Technol 51:1287–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger WH, Parker FL (1970) Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep sea sediments. Science 168:1345–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borowitzka MA (2005) Culturing microalgae in outdoor ponds. In: Andeersen D (ed) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp 205–218Google Scholar
  9. Butler E, Hung Y, Al Ahmad MS, Yeh RY, Liu RL, Fu Y (2015) Oxidation pond for municipal wastewater treatment. Appl Water Sci 7:31–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho L, Kirika A (2003) Changes in shallow lake functioning to climate changes and nutrient reduction. Hydrobiologia 506:789–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coder DM, Starr M (1978) Antagonistic association of the chlorellavorus bacterium (“Bdellovibriochlorellavorus) with Chlorella vulgaris. Curr Microbiol 1: 59–64Google Scholar
  12. Converti A, Casazza AA, Ortiz EY, Perego P, Delborghi M (2009) Effects of temperature and nitrogen concentration on the growth and lipid content of Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Chem Eng Process 48:1146–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coppens J, Grunert O, Van Den Hende S, Vanhoutte I, Boon N, Haesaert G, De Gelder L (2016) The use of microalgae as a high-value organic slow-release fertilizer results in tomatoes with increased carotenoid and sugar levels. J Appl Phycol 28:2367–2377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF), (1996a) South African Water guidelines. First edition. Volume 8: Field guideGoogle Scholar
  15. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF), (1996b) South African Water guidelines. Second edition. Volume 1: Domestic useGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia J, Mujeriego R, Hernández-Mariné M (2000) High rate algal pond operating strategies for urban wastewater nitrogen removal. J Appl Phycol 12:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gratziou MK, Tsalkatidou M, Kotsovinos NE (2006) Economic evaluation of small capacity sewage processing units. Global NEST J 8:52–60Google Scholar
  18. Hamilton DP, Spillman C, Prescott K, Kratz TK, Magnuson JJ (2001) Effects of atmospheric nutrient input on trophic status of Crystal Lake, Wisconsin. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 28:467–470Google Scholar
  19. Hardin G (1960) The competitive exclusion theory. Science 131:1292–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Happy-Wood CM (1988) Ecology of freshwater planktonic green algae. In: Sandgren CD (ed) Growth and Reproductive Strategies of Freshwater Phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 175–226Google Scholar
  21. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  22. Jayangouder IA, Thanecker KP, Krishnamurthi I, Satyanarayana S (1983) Growth potentials of algae in anaerobically treated slaughter house waste. Indian J Environ Hlth 25:209–2013Google Scholar
  23. Klein RM (1972) Future prospects of algae and man. Pp778-781. In: Fredrick JF, Klein RM (eds). Phylogenesis and Morphogenesis in the Algae. Ann NY Acad Sci 175: 413-781Google Scholar
  24. König A (2000) Biologia de las lagunas de estabilizacion: algas. In: Sistemas de Lagunas de estabilization: como utilizar aguas residuals tratadas en sistemas de regadio. Mendonca, S.R. (Coord.) McGraw Hill, 44–67Google Scholar
  25. Larsdotter K (2006) Wastewater treatment with microalgae—a literature review. Vatten 62:31–38Google Scholar
  26. Lee YK (2001) Microalgal mass culture system and methods: their limitation and potential. J Appl Phycol 13:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Madhab D, Mahapatra H, Chanakya N (2013) Treatment efficacy of algae-based sewage treatment plants. Environ Monit Assess 13:1–19Google Scholar
  28. Mahapatra DM, Chanakya HN, Ramachandra TV (2013) Treatment efficacy of algae – based sewage treatment plants. J Environ Monit Assess 185:7145–7164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mesple F, Troussellier M, Casellas C, Bontoux J (1995) Difficulties in modelling phosphate evolution in a high-rate algal pond. Water Sci Technol 31:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moutin T, Gal JY, El Halouani H, Picot B, Bontoux J (1992) Decrease of phosphate concentration in a high rate pond by precipitation of calcium phosphate: theoretical and experimental results. Water Res 26:1445–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oberholster PJ, Botha AM, Myburg JG (2009) Linking climate changes and progressive eutrophication to incidents of clustered animal mortalities in different geographical regions of South Africa. Afr J Biotechnol 8:5825–5832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oberholster PJ, Botha AM, Chamier J, De Klerk A (2013) Longitudinal trends in water chemistry and phytoplankton assemblage downstream of the Riverview WWTP in the Upper Olifants River. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 13:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oberholster PJ, Botha AM, Hill L, Strydom WF (2017) River catchment responses to anthropogenic acidification in relationship with sewage effluent: an ecotoxicology screening application. Chemosphere 189:407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palmer CM (1969) A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution. J Phycol 5:78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pearson H, Mara D, Arridge H (1995) The influence of pond geometry and configuration on facultative and maturation waste stabilization pond performance and efficiency. Water Sci Technol 31:129–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pham DT, Everaert G, Janssens N, Alvarado A, Nopens I, Goethals PLM (2014) Algal community analysis in a waste stabilisation pond. Ecol Eng 73:302–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficient and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectrometry. Biochim Biophys Acta 975:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reynolds CS (1984) Phytoplankton periodicity: the interactions of form, function and environmental variability. Freshwat Biol 1:111–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shi C, Shi X (2006) Characterization of three genes encoding the subunits of light-independent protochlorophylide reductase in Chlorella protothecoides CS-41. Biotechnol Prog 22:1050–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Starr RC (1964) The culture collection of algae at Indiana University. Am J Bot 51:1013–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tadross M, Johnston P (2012) ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability- Africa Climate Systems Regional Report: Southern Africa. ISBN: 978–0–9921794-6-5Google Scholar
  42. Taylor JC, Harding WR, Archibald CGM (2007) An illustrated guide to some common diatom species from South Africa. WRC Report, No. TT 282/07. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa, plates, pp 1–178Google Scholar
  43. Truter, E. 1987 An aid to the identification of the dominant and commonly occurring genera of algae observed in some South African impoundments. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Water Affairs, 1–97 ppGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Vuuren S, Taylor JC, Gerber A, Van Ginkel C (2006) Easy identification of the most common freshwater algae. North-West University and Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa, pp 1–200Google Scholar
  45. Varon MP, Mara (2004) Water stabilization ponds. IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, LeedsGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang L, Min M, Li Y, Chen P, Chen Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Ruan R (2010) Cultivation of green algae Chlorella sp. in different sewage wastewaters from municipal sewage wastewater treatment plant. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 162:1174–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang H, Wang T, Zhang B, Li F, Toure B, Omosa IB, Chiramba T, Abdel-Monem M, Pradham M (2014) Water and wastewater treatment in Africa—current practices and challenges. Clean: Soil Air Water 42:1029–1035Google Scholar
  48. Wehr JD, Sheath RG (2003) Freshwater habitats of algae. In: Wehr JD, Sheath RG (eds) Freshwater algae of North America: ecology and classification. Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp 11–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang Q, Zhan J-J, Hong Y (2016) The effects of temperature on the growth, lipid accumulation and nutrient removal characteristics of Chlorella sp. HQ. Desalin Water Treat 57:10403–10408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul J. Oberholster
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Po-Hsun Cheng
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. Genthe
    • 1
  • M. Steyn
    • 1
  1. 1.CSIR Natural Resources and the EnvironmentStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa
  3. 3.Department of Botany and ZoologyUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations