Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 457–463 | Cite as

Assessment of the algae-based biofertilizer influence on date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivation

  • Imen SaadaouiEmail author
  • Rehab Sedky
  • Rihab Rasheed
  • Touria Bounnit
  • Amal Almahmoud
  • Ali Elshekh
  • Tasneem Dalgamouni
  • Khaled al Jmal
  • Probir Das
  • Hareb Al Jabri


Date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) is the main fruit crop found in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. It naturally adapts to the adverse environments of extreme heat and water scarcity and prevents further desertification in addition to producing fruits with high nutritional value. It is seen in many parts of the world that traditional cultivation practices such as mixed planting and chemical fertilizers have led to low fruit quality resulting in low market values. Long generation time also hinders production of the dates. Tissue culture is therefore considered the most promising solution for rapid large-scale production of true-to-type clonal plants. The plantlets originating from in vitro callus proliferation are transferred from synthetic media to soil. The conventional method of using chemical fertilizers also leads to low plantlet viability with increased environmental and health risk. The current research targets the use of a local microalga, Tetraselmis sp. QUCCCM8, identified as an organic source of nutrients, a substitute for chemical fertilizers to acclimatize cultured date palmlets to soil. Soil was supplemented with different concentrations of algal biomass and plant growth was monitored for 3 months. Soil without any fertilizer and soil amended with 1 g conventional fertilizer were used as negative and positive control, respectively. Supplementation with 0.5 g of algal biomass led to higher plant growth rates, 100% survival rates, high ability of rooting (3.17 ± 0.14 roots), higher number of leaves (2.5 ± 0.25 leaves), largest stem thickness, longer shoot (33.75 ± 1.56 cm), and higher total chlorophyll (159.61 ± 9.6 mg L−1) as compared to conventional fertilizer. These stated findings are significantly higher than the control. Furthermore, elemental analysis of the soil showed that supplementation with algal biomass increased the soil total nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus contents essential for plant growth. Finally, the comparison of heavy metals composition between soils amended with conventional fertilizer and algae-based fertilizer highlights the potential use of algae as a safe and efficient biofertilizer post tissue culture mode of plantlet generation. This enhanced the viability of healthy plantlets without affecting the environment, averting usage of chemical fertilizers.


Microalgae Tetraselmis Biofertilizer Date palm Sustainable agriculture 



Special thanks to Kira Schipper for the proof reading.

Funding information

This report was made possible by the NPRP award [NPRP8-1087-1-207] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation).

Compliance with ethical standards


The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.


  1. Ahmed IA, Ahmed AWK, Robinson RK (1995) Chemical composition of date varieties as influenced by the stage of ripening. Food Chem 54:305–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee A, Datta JK, Mondal NK, Chanda T (2011) Influence of integrated nutrient management on soil properties of old alluvial soil under mustard cropping system. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:2473–2492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barak P, Jobe BO, Krueger AR, Peterson LA, Laird DA (1997) Effects of long-term soil acidification due to nitrogen fertilizer inputs in Wisconsin. Plant Soil 197:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Factories 13:66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonifacio A, Martins MO, Ribeiro CW, Fontenele AV, Carvalho FE, Margis-Pinheiro M, Silveira JA (2011) Role of peroxidases in the compensation of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase knockdown in rice plants under abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ 34:1705–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boopathi T, Balamurugan V, Gopinath S, Sundararaman M (2013) Characterization of IAA production by the mangrove cyanobacterium Phormidium sp. MI405019 and its influence on tobacco seed germination and organogenesis. J Plant Growth Regul 32:758–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caiozzi M, Peirano P, Rauch E, Zunino H (1968) Effect of seaweed on the levels of available phosphorus and nitrogen in calcareous soil. Agron J 60:324–3Google Scholar
  8. Caverzan A, Casassola A, Brammer SP (2016) Antioxidant responses of wheat plants under stress. Genet Mol Biol 39:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chao CT (2007) The date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.): overview of biology, uses, and cultivation. Hortic Sci 42:1077–1082Google Scholar
  10. Coppens J, Grunert O, Van Den Hende S, Vanhoutte I, Boon N, Haesaert G, De Gelder L (2016) The use of microalgae as a high-value organic slow-release fertilizer results in tomatoes with increased carotenoid and sugar levels. J Appl Phycol 28:2367–2377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Das P, Thaher MI, Hakim MA, Al-Jabri HM, Alghasal GS (2016) A comparative study of the growth of Tetraselmis sp. in large scale fixed depth and decreasing depth raceway ponds. Bioresour Technol 216:114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dash NP, Kumar A, Kaushik MS, Singh PK (2016) Cyanobacterial (unicellular and heterocystous) biofertilization to wetland rice influenced by nitrogenous agrochemical. J Appl Phycol 28:3343–3351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garai TK, Datta JK, Mondal NK (2014) Evaluation of integrated nutrient management on boro rice in alluvial soil and its impacts upon growth, yield attributes, yield and soil nutrient status. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia-Gonzalez J, Sommerfeld M (2016) Biofertilizer and biostimulant properties of the microalga Acutodesmus dimorphus. J Appl Phycol 28:1051–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillard RRL, Ryther JH (1962) Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Can J Microbiol 8:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta AB, Lata K (1964) Effect of algal growth hormones on the germination of paddy seeds. Hydrobiologia 24:430–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hashtroudi MS, Ghassempour A, Riahi H, Shariatmadari Z, Khanjir M (2013) Endogenous auxins in plant growth-promoting cyanobacteria—Anabaena vaginicola and Nostoc calcicola. J Appl Phycol 25:379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haslam SFI, Hopkins DW (1996) Physical and biological effects of kelp (seaweed) added to soil. Appl Soil Ecol 3:257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hazarika BN, Parthasarathy VA, Nagaraju V (2002) Action of paclobutrazol in acclimatizing. Ind J Agric Res 36:57–60Google Scholar
  20. Jain SM, Al-Khayri JM, Johnson D (eds) (2011) Date palm biotechnology. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  21. Kurup SS, Aly MAM, Lekshmi G, Tawfik NH (2014) Rapid in vitro regeneration of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Kheneizi using tender leaf explant. Emir J Food Agric 26:539–544Google Scholar
  22. Lorenz SE, Hamon RE, McGrath SP, Holm PE, Christensen TH (1994) Applications of fertilizer cations affect cadmium and zinc concentrations in soil solutions and uptake by plants. Eur J Soil Sci 45:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mahajan S, Mahajan S, Tuteja N, Tuteja N (2005) Cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophys 444:139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mishra D, Rajvir S, Mishra U, Kumar S (2013) Role of bio-fertilizer in organic agriculture: a review. Res J Recent Sci 2:39–41Google Scholar
  25. Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, Van Breusegem F (2004) Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci 9:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nieuwenhuize J, Poley-Vos CH, van den Akker AH, van Delft W (1991) Comparison of microwave and conventional extraction techniques for the determination of metals in soil, sediment and sludge samples by atomic spectrometry. Analyst 116:347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pereira I, Ortega R, Barrientos L, Moya M, Reyes G, Kramm V (2009) Development of a biofertilizer based on filamentous nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria for rice crops in Chile. J Appl Phycol 21:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Porra RJ, Thompson WA, Kriedemann PE (1989) Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg 975:384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pospíšilová J, Tichá I, Kadleček P, Haisel D, Plzáková S (1999) Acclimatization of micropropagated plants to ex vitro conditions. Biol Plant 42:481–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosa SB, Caverzan A, Teixeira FK, Lazzarotto F, Silveira JA, Ferreira-Silva SL, Abreu-Neto J, Margis R, Margis-Pinheiro M (2010) Cytosolic APx knockdown indicates an ambiguous redox responses in rice. Phytochemistry 71:548–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saadaoui I, Al Ghazal G, Bounnit T, Al Khulaifi F, Al Jabri H, Potts M (2016) Evidence of thermo and halotolerant Nannochloris isolate suitable for biodiesel production in Qatar Culture Collection of Cyanobacteria and Microalgae. Algal Res 14:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salim S, Bosma R, Vermuë MH, Wijffels RH (2011) Harvesting of microalgae by bio-flocculation. J Appl Phycol 23:849–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sandroni V, Smith CMM (2002) Microwave digestion of sludge, soil and sediment samples for metal analysis by inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 468:335–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh JS, Pandey VC, Singh DP (2011) Efficient soil microorganisms: a new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:339–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tarakhovskaya ER, Maslov YI, Shishova MF (2007) Phytohormones in algae. Russ J Plant Physiol 54:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tripathi RD, Dwivedi S, Shukla MK, Mishra S, Srivastava S, Singh R, Rai UN, Gupta DK (2008) Role of blue green algae biofertilizer in ameliorating the nitrogen demand and fly-ash stress to the growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Chemosphere 70:1919–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Uysal O, Uysal FO, Ekinci K (2015) Evaluation of microalgae as microbial fertilizer. Eur J Sustain Dev 4:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wake H, Akasaka A, Umetsu H, Ozeki Y, Shimomura K, Matsunaga T (1992) Promotion of plantlet formation from somatic embryos of carrot treated with a high molecular weight extract from a marine cyanobacterium. Plant Cell Rep 62–65(54):11Google Scholar
  39. Zohary D, Hopf M (2000) Domestication of plants in the old world. Third ed. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imen Saadaoui
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rehab Sedky
    • 2
  • Rihab Rasheed
    • 1
  • Touria Bounnit
    • 1
  • Amal Almahmoud
    • 2
  • Ali Elshekh
    • 2
  • Tasneem Dalgamouni
    • 1
  • Khaled al Jmal
    • 3
  • Probir Das
    • 1
  • Hareb Al Jabri
    • 1
  1. 1.Algal Technologies Program, Centre for Sustainable Development, College of Arts and SciencesQatar UniversityDohaQatar
  2. 2.Agricultural Research DepartmentMinistry of Municipality and EnvironmentDohaQatar
  3. 3.Department of Chemical Engineering, College of EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations