Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 2981–2988 | Cite as

Algal biophotovoltaic (BPV) device for generation of bioelectricity using Synechococcus elongatus (Cyanophyta)

  • Fong-Lee NgEmail author
  • Siew-Moi PhangEmail author
  • Vengadesh Periasamy
  • John Beardall
  • Kamran Yunus
  • Adrian C. Fisher
8th Asian Pacific Phycological Forum

Abstract

The exploitation of renewable energy sources for delivering carbon neutral or carbon negative solutions has become challenging in the current era because conventional fuel sources are of finite origins. Algae are being used in the development of biophotovoltaic (BPV) platforms which are used to harvest solar energy for bioelectricity generation. Fast-growing algae have a high potential for converting CO2 from the atmosphere into biomass and valuable products. In photosynthesis light-driven splitting of water occurs, releasing a pair of electrons and generating O2. The electrons can be harvested and converted to bioelectricity. In this study, algal biofilms of a tropical cyanobacterial strain Synechococcus elongatus (UMACC 105) were formed on two types of electrodes, indium tin oxide (ITO) and reduced graphene oxide (rGO), and investigated for use in the algal biophotovoltaic (BPV) device. The highest maximum power density was registered in the rGO-based BPV device (0.538 ± 0.014 mW m−2). This illustrates the potential of this local algal strain for use in BPV devices to generate bioelectricity in both the light and dark conditions.

Keywords

Algal biophotovoltaic (BPV) device Bioelectricity Cyanophyta 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by Newton Fund, Institutional Link Grant (IF007-2015), Newton Prize 2017 (IF008-2018), IOES UMCoE RU Grant (RU003C-2017), HICoE MOHE: Air-ocean-land Interaction Grant (IOES-2014), and UM Algae Grant (GA003-2012).

References

  1. Allahverdiyeva Y, Aro EM, Kosourov SN (2014) Recent developments on cyanobacteria and green algae for biohydrogen photoproduction and its importance in CO2 reduction. In: Gupta V, Tuohy M, Kubicek CP, Saddler J, Xu F (eds) Bioenergy research: advances and applications. Elsevier, New York, pp 367–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson SL, McIntosh L (1991) Light-activated heterotrophic growth of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803: a blue-light-requiring process. J Bacteriol 173:2761–2767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benemann JR (1997) Feasibility analysis of photobiological hydrogen production. Int J Hydrog Energy 22:979–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binder A (1982) Respiration and photosynthesis in energy-transducing membranes of cyanobacteria. J Bioenerg Biomembr 14:271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blankenship RE, Tiede DM, Barber J, Brudvig GW, Fleming G, Ghirardi M, Gunner MR, Junge W, Kramer DM, Melis A, Moore TA, Moser CC, Nocera DG, Nozik AJ, Ort DR, Parson WW, Prince RC, Sayre RT (2011) Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement. Science 332:805–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bombelli P, McCormick A, Bradley R, Yunus K, Philips J, Anderson X, Cruz S, Thorne R, Gu N, Smith A, Bendall D, Howe C, Peter L, Fisher A (2011) Harnessing solar energy by bio-photovoltaic (BPV) devices. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 76:89–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley RW, Bombelli P, Rowden SJL, Howe CJ (2012) Biological photovoltaics: intra- and extra-cellular electron transport by cyanobacteria. Biochem Soc Trans 40:1302–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiao M, Lam KB, Lin L (2006) Micromachined microbial and photosynthetic fuel cells. J Micromech Microeng 16:2547–2553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Furukawa Y, Moriuchi T, Morishima K (2005) Design principle and prototyping of direct photosynthetic/metabolic bio fuel cell (DPBFC). J Micromech Microeng 16:182–185Google Scholar
  10. He Z, Kan J, Mansfeld F, Angenent LT, Nealson KH (2009) Self-sustained phototrophic microbial fuel cells based on the synergistic cooperation between photosynthetic microorganisms and heterotrophic bacteria. Environ Sci Technol 43:1648–1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Helmut A (2005) The economics of wind energy within the generation mix. Int J Energy Technol Policy 3:158–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hwang J, Amy F, Kahn A (2006) Spectroscopic study on sputtered PEDOT·PSS: role of surface PSS layer. Org Electron 7:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ibrahim SA, Jaafar MM, Ng FL, Phang SM, Kumar GG, Majid WHA, Periasamy V (2018) Plasma-treated Langmuir–Blodgett reduced graphene oxide thin film for applications in biophotovoltaics. Appl Phys A 124:59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang H, Luo S, Shi X, Dai M, Guo R (2012) A novel microbial fuel cell and photobioreactor system for continuous domestic wastewater treatment and bioelectricity generation. Biotechnol Lett 34:1269–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Khetkorn W, Rastogi RP, Incharoensakdi A, Lindblad P, Madamwar D, Pandey A, Larroche C (2017) Microalgal hydrogen production—a review. Bioresour Technol 243:1194–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim JY, Kim SH, Lee H, Lee K, Ma W, Gong X, Heeger AJ (2006) New architecture for high-efficiency polymer photovoltaic cells using solution-based titanium oxide as an optical spacer. Adv Mater 18:572–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kostarelos K, Novoselov KS (2014) Exploring the interface of graphene and biology. Science 344:261–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lim SL, Chu WL, Phang SM (2010) Use of Chlorella vulgaris for bioremediation of textile wastewater. Bioresour Technol 101:7314–7322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCormick AJ, Bombelli P, Scott AM, Philips AJ, Smith AG, Fisher AC, Howe CJ (2011) Photosynthetic biofilms in pure culture harness solar energy in a mediatorless bio-photovoltaic cell (BPV) system. Energy Environ Sci 4:4699–4709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ng FL, Phang SM, Periasamy V, Yunus K, Fisher AC (2014a) Evaluation of algal biofilms on indium tin oxide (ITO) for use in biophotovoltaic platforms based on photosynthetic performance. PLoS One 9:e97643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ng FL, Jaafar MM, Phang SM, Chan Z, Salleh NA, Azmi SZ, Yunus K, Fisher AC, Periasamy V (2014b) Reduced graphene oxide anodes for potential application in algae biophotovoltaic platforms. Sci Rep 4:7562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ng FL, Phang SM, Periasamy V, Yunus K, Fisher AC (2017) Enhancement of power output by using alginate immobilized algae in biophotovoltaic devices. Sci Rep 7:16237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nishio K, Hashimoto K, Watanabe K (2010) Light/electricity conversion by a self-organized photosynthetic biofilm in a single-chamber reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotech 86:957–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pelroy RA, Bassham JA (1972) Photosynthetic and dark carbon metabolism in unicellular blue-green algae. Arch Microbiol 86:25–38Google Scholar
  25. Phang SM, Chu WL (1999) Catalogue of Strains, University of Malaya Algae Culture Collection (UMACC). Institute of Postgraduate Studies and Research, University of Malaya, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  26. Pisciotta JM, Zou Y, Baskakov IV (2010) Light-dependent electrogenic activity of cyanobacteria. PLoS One 5:e10821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prince RC, Kheshgi HS (2005) The photobiological production of hydrogen: potential efficiency and effectiveness as a renewable fuel. Crit Rev Microbiol 31:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quintana N, Van der Kooy F, Van de Rhee MD, Voshol GP, Verpoorte R (2011) Renewable energy from cyanobacteria: energy production optimization by metabolic pathway engineering. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:471–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith AJ (1982) Modes of cyanobacterial carbon metabolism. In: Carr NG, Whitton BA (eds) The biology of cyanobacteria. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 47–86Google Scholar
  30. Strickland JDH, Parsons TRA (1968) Practical handbook of seawater analysis. The Alger Press Lt., OttawaGoogle Scholar
  31. Strycharz-Glaven SM, Glaven RH, Wang Z, Zhou J, Vora GJ, Tender LM (2013) Electrochemical investigation of a microbial solar cell reveals a nonphotosynthetic biocathode catalyst. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3933–3942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tamulonis C, Postma M, Kaandorp J (2011) Modeling filamentous cyanobacteria reveals the advantages of long and fast trichomes for optimizing light exposure. PLoS One 6:e22084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tanaka K, Tamamushi R, Ogawa T (1985) Bioelectrochemical fuel-cells operated by the cyanobacterium, Anabaena variabilis. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 35:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yagishita T, Sawayama S, Tsukahara K, Ogi T (1997) Effects of intensity of incident light and concentrations of Synechococcus sp. and 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone on the current output of photosynthetic electrochemical cell. Sol Energy 61:347–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fong-Lee Ng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Siew-Moi Phang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Vengadesh Periasamy
    • 3
  • John Beardall
    • 4
  • Kamran Yunus
    • 5
  • Adrian C. Fisher
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences (IOES)University of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.Low Dimensional Materials Research Centre (LDMRC), Department of PhysicsUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  4. 4.School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  5. 5.Department of Chemical Engineering and BiotechnologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations