Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 3039–3055 | Cite as

A nitrogen budget model with a user-friendly interface, to assess water renewal rates and nitrogen limitation in commercial seaweed farms

  • A. M. Nobre
  • L. M. P. Valente
  • A. Neori
Article

Abstract

Key factors affecting the economic sustainability of any aquaculture industry and in particular the seaweed industry are its ecological interactions and impacts. Understanding these issues requires an extended production analysis and simulation, given the natural variability and dynamics of external factors that affect those interdependencies. As such, making sense of production data is required for suitable planning and resource optimization in a seaweed farm. The present work calculates the required water renewal rates for seaweed flow-through production units, using a novel simple user-friendly nitrogen budget model. The user interface is straightforward and the model parameter inputs and outputs are minimal, whereby the target users are commercial seaweed farmers. The model was parameterized for production kinetics of Ulva spp. based on an extensive literature survey, and was evaluated with published data on seaweed-growing experiments. Results for the estimated number of volume renewals per day are in agreement with the experimental data. The outputs indicate that this application can be used to estimate the envelope, i.e. average lower and upper ranges for water renewal rates for a given production in a given site. This model and corresponding parameterization for Ulva spp. are available to be used by farmers, managers and researchers in the form of a spreadsheet file (available as Supplementary Material). The conceptual model and application presented herein represent the basis for future developments to incrementally increase complexity, regarding additional seaweed species and production settings (in recirculating and integrated multitrophic aquaculture systems) by farmers and planners.

Keywords

Seaweed production Mass balance model Nitrogen budget Aquatic resource analysis and simulation Nutrient limitation Seaweed growth and uptake models Ulva Mariculture 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments, which considerably improved this manuscript. Financial support was provided by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) as postdoc scholarship to Ana Nobre (SFRH/BPD/109442/2015).

Supplementary material

10811_2017_1164_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (140 kb)
ESM 1 (XLSX 140 kb)

References

  1. Abreu MH, Pereira R, Yarish C, Buschmann AH, Sousa-Pinto I (2011) IMTA with Gracilaria vermiculophylla: productivity and nutrient removal performance of the seaweed in a land-based pilot scale system. Aquaculture 312:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ale MT, Mikkelsen JD, Meyer AS (2011) Differential growth response of Ulva lactuca to ammonium and nitrate assimilation. J Appl Phycol 23:345–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baghel RS, Trivedi N, Gupta V, Neori A, Reddy CRK, Lali A, Jha B (2015) Biorefining of marine macroalgal biomass for production of biofuel and commodity chemicals. Green Chem 17:2436–2443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Ari T, Neori A, Ben-Ezra D, Shauli L, Odintsov V, Shpigel M (2014) Management of Ulva lactuca as a biofilter of mariculture effluents in IMTA system. Aquaculture 434:493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buschmann AH, Troell M, Kautsky N (2001) Integrated algal farming: a review. Cahi Biol Mar 42:83–90Google Scholar
  6. Buschmann AH, Troell M, Kautsky N, Kautsky L (1996) Integrated tank cultivation of salmonids and Gracilaria chilensis (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta). Hydrobiologia 326:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castine SA, McKinnon AD, Paul NA, Trott LA, de Nys R (2013) Wastewater treatment for land-based aquaculture: improvements and value-adding alternatives in model systems from Australia. Aquac Environ Interact 4:285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chopin T, Robinson SMC, Troell M, Neori A, Buschmann AH, Fang J (2008) Multitrophic integration for sustainable marine aquaculture. In: Jørgensen SE, Fathi BD (eds) Ecological engineering. Vol. 3 of Encyclopedia of Ecology. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 2463-2475Google Scholar
  9. Chung IK, Beardall J, Mehta S, Sahoo D, Stojkovic S (2011) Using marine macroalgae for carbon sequestration: a critical appraisal. J Appl Phycol 23:877–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen I, Neori A (1991) Ulva lactuca biofilters for marine fishpond effluents. I. Ammonia uptake kinetics and nitrogen content. Bot Mar 34:475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa JC, Gonçalves P, Nobre A, Alves M (2012) Biomethanation potential of macroalgae Ulva spp. and Gracilaria spp. and in co-digestion with waste activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 114:320–326CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. del Río MJ, Ramazanov Z, García-Reina G (1996) Ulva rigida (Ulvales, Chlorophyta) tank culture as biofilters for dissolved inorganic nitrogen from fishpond effluents. Hydrobiologia 326:61–66Google Scholar
  13. Droop MR (1983) 25 years of algal growth kinetics a personal view. Bot Mar 26:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duarte CM, Wu J, Xiao X, Bruhn A, Krause-Jensen D (2017) Can seaweed farming play a role in climate change mitigation and adaptation? Front Mar Sci 4:100. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00100 Google Scholar
  15. FAO (2014) Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics. Global production 2014. (FishStatJ). In: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department online. Rome. Updated 2014. http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/FishStatJ/en. Accessed 26 Sept 2016
  16. FAO (2016) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. FAO, Rome, 200 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Fujita RM, Goldman JC (1985) Nutrient flux and growth of the red alga Gracilaria tikvahiae McLachlan (Rhodophyta). Bot Mar 28:265–268Google Scholar
  18. Fujita RM, Wheeler PA, Edwards RL (1989) Assessment of macroalgal nitrogen limitation in a seasonal upwelling region. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 53:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao K, McKinley K (1994) Use of macroalgae for marine biomass production and CO2 remediation: a review. J Appl Phycol 6:45–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grobbelaar JU (2004) Algal nutrition. In: Richmond A (ed) Handbook of microalgal culture: biotechnology and applied phycology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 97–115Google Scholar
  21. Hadley S, Wild-Allen K, Johnson C, Macleod C (2015) Modeling macroalgae growth and nutrient dynamics for integrated multi-trophic aquaculture. J Appl Phycol 27:901–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hafting JT, Cornish ML, Deveau A, Critchley AT (2015) Marine algae: gathered resource to global food industry. In: Sahoo D, Seckbach J (eds) The algae world. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 403–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim JK, Kraemer GP, Yarish C (2015) Sugar kelp aquaculture in Long Island Sound and the Bronx River estuary for nutrient bioextraction associated with biomass production. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 531:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korzen L, Pulidindi IN, Israel A, Abelsona A, Gedanken A (2015) Marine integrated culture of carbohydrate rich Ulva rigida for enhanced production of bioethanol. RSC Adv 73:59251–59256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mata L, Schuenhoff A, Santos R (2010) A direct comparison of the performance of the seaweed biofilters, Asparagopsis armata and Ulva rigida. J Appl Phycol 22:639–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matos J, Costa S, Rodriques A, Pereira R, Sousa Pinto I (2006) Experimental integrated aquaculture of fish and red seaweeds in northern Portugal. Aquaculture 252:31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neori A (1996) The type of N-supply (ammonia or nitrate) determines the performance of seaweed biofilters integrated with intensive fish culture. Israeli J Aquacult 48:19–27Google Scholar
  28. Neori A (2016) Can sustainable mariculture match agriculture’s output? Global Aquaculture Advocate August 18, 2016. http://advocate.gaalliance.org/can-sustainable-mariculture-match-agricultures-output/. Accessed 26 Sept 2016
  29. Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, Buschmann AH, Kraemer GP, Halling C, Shpigel M, Yarish C (2004) Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 231:361–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neori A, Cohen I, Gordin H (1991) Ulva lactuca biofilters for marine fishpond effluents. II. Growth rate, yield and C:N ratio. Bot Mar 34:483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neori A, Shpigel M (2006) An integrated system for farming fish, seaweed and abalone. CAB International Aquaculture Compendium, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Neori A, Troell M, Chopin T, Yarish C, Critchley A, Buschmann AH (2007) The need for a balanced ecosystem approach to blue revolution aquaculture. Environ Sci Policy Sust Develop 49:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nobre AM, Ferreira JG, Newton A, Simas T, Icely JD, Neves R (2005) Management of coastal eutrophication: integration of field data, ecosystem-scale simulations and screening models. J Mar Syst 56:375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nobre AM, Robertson-Andersson D, Neori A, Sankar K (2010) Ecological–economic assessment of aquaculture options: comparison between abalone monoculture and integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of abalone and seaweeds. Aquaculture 306:116–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norziah MH, Ching CY (2000) Nutritional composition of edible seaweed Gracilaria changgi. Food Chem 68:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pedersen MF, Borum J (1996) Nutrient control of algal growth in estuarine waters. Nutrient limitation and the importance of nitrogen requirements and nitrogen storage among phytoplankton and species of macroalgae. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 142:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pedersen MF, Borum J (1997) Nutrient control of estuarine macroalgae: growth strategy and the balance between nitrogen requirements and uptake. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 161:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pereira P, Valente LMP, Sousa-Pinto I, Rema P (2012) Apparent nutrient digestibility of seaweeds by rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Algal Res 1:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Radulovich R, Neori A, Valderrama D, Reddy CRK, Cronin H, Forster J (2015) Farming of seaweeds. In: Tiwari B, Troy D (eds) Seaweed sustainability—food and nonfood applications. Academic Press, London, pp 27–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robertson-Andersson D, Potgieter M, Hansen J, Bolton J, Troell M, Anderson RJ, Halling C, Probyn T (2008) Integrated seaweed cultivation on an abalone farm in South Africa. J Appl Phycol 20:579–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Samocha TM, Fricker J, Ali AM, Shpigel M, Neori A (2015) Growth and nutrient uptake of the macroalga Gracilaria tikvahiae cultured with the shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in an Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) system. Aquaculture 446:263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schuenhoff A, Shpigel M, Lupatsch I, Ashkenazi A, Msuya FE, Neori A (2003) A semi-recirculating, integrated system for the culture of fish and seaweed. Aquaculture 221:167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sheehan J, Dunahay T, Benemann J, Roessler P (1998) A look back at the U.S. Department of Energy’s Aquatic Species Program—biodiesel from algae. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado. NREL/TP-580-24190, pp 1–328Google Scholar
  44. Solidoro C, Pecenik G, Pastres R, Franco D, Dejak C (1997) Modelling macroalgae (Ulva rigida) in the Venice lagoon: model structure identification and first parameters estimation. Ecol Model 94:191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Troell M, Halling C, Neori A, Chopin T, Buschmann AH, Kautsky N, Yarish C (2003) Integrated mariculture: asking the right questions. Aquaculture 226:69–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Troell M, Neori A, Chopin T, Buschmann AH (2005) Biological wastewater treatment in aquaculture—more than just bacteria. World Aquacult 36:27–29Google Scholar
  47. Turpin DH (1992) Physiological mechanisms in phytoplankton resource competition. In: Sandgren (ed) Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 316–368Google Scholar
  48. Valente LMP, Araújo M, Batista S, Peixoto MJ, Sousa-Pinto I, Brotas V, Cunha LM, Rema P (2016) Carotenoid deposition, flesh quality and immunological response of Nile tilapia fed increasing levels of IMTA-cultivated Ulva spp. J Appl Phycol 28:691–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Valente LMP, Gouveia A, Rema P, Matos J, Gomes E, Pinto IS (2006) Evaluation of three seaweeds Gracilaria bursa-pastoris, Ulva rigida and Gracilaria cornea as dietary ingredients in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles. Aquaculture 252:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Valente LMP, Rema P, Ferraro V, Pintado M, Sousa-Pinto I, Brotas V, Cunha LM, Oliveira MB, Araújo M (2015) Iodine enrichment of rainbow trout flesh by dietary supplementation with the red seaweed Gracilaria vermiculophylla. Aquaculture 446:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Iersel S, Gamba L, Rossi A, Alberici S, Dehue B, van de Staaij J, Flammini A (2009) Algae-based biofuels: a review of challenges and opportunities for developing countries. FAO, Environment, Climate Change and Bioenergy Division, Rome, 59 ppGoogle Scholar
  52. Yarish C, Redmond S, Kim JK (2012) Gracilaria culture handbook for New England. Wrack Lines. Paper 72. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/wracklines/72. Accessed 26 Sept 2016

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIMAR/CIIMAR—Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental, Universidade do PortoMatosinhosPortugal
  2. 2.ICBAS—Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel SalazarUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.National Center for MaricultureIsrael Oceanographic and Limnological ResearchEilatIsrael
  4. 4.The Helmsley Charitable Trust Mediterranean Sea Research Center, Sedot Yam, The Leon H. Charney School of Marine SciencesHaifa UniversityHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations