Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 1421–1428 | Cite as

Application of sodium alginate in induced biological soil crusts: enhancing the sand stabilization in the early stage

  • Chengrong Peng
  • Jiaoli Zheng
  • Shun Huang
  • Shuangshuang Li
  • Dunhai LiEmail author
  • Mingyu Cheng
  • Yongding Liu
Article

Abstract

Induced biological soil crust (IBSC) technology has proved to be an effective means for speeding up the recovery of biological soil crusts (BSC) in arid and semi-arid regions. This study aims at improving the IBSC technology by using sodium alginate (SA) due to its sand-stabilizing ability in the early development stage of IBSCs. Results showed that SA can easily form a thin film on the surface of soil and can significantly enhance the compressive strength of the topsoil. More importantly, no negative effects of SA on the development and physiological activity of IBSCs were observed, and SA could facilitate the colonization and growth of cyanobacteria on sand. Moreover, the application of SA was much cheaper than the straw checkerboard barriers which are widely used in desertification control. This study suggests that SA can promote and accelerate the formation of BSCs; thus, it can be applied in IBSC technology to enhance the sand-stabilizing property of BSCs in the early stage.

Keywords

Biological soil crusts Ecological restoration Sand stabilization Sodium alginate Water retention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been jointly supported by the Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare (20140420402), National Key R&D program (2016YFD0200309-4), and Fund for Sand Stabilization and Circular Economy (2013-N-121) from Qinghai Science and Technology Department. The authors wish to gratefully express their thanks to Yuan Xiao in Testing and Analysis Center of Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, for her assistance in the ultrastructure observation.

Supplementary material

10811_2017_1061_MOESM1_ESM.docx (836 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 835 kb)

References

  1. Belnap J, Eldridge D (2001) Disturbance and recovery of biological soil crusts. In: Belnap J, Lange OL (eds) Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management. Springer, Berlin, pp 363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belnap J, Gardner JS (1993) Soil microstructure in soils of the Colorado Plateau: the role of the cyanobacterium Microcoleus vaginatus. The Great Basin Naturalist 53:40–47Google Scholar
  3. Belnap J, Gillette D (1997) Disturbance of biological soil crusts: impacts on potential wind erodibility of sandy desert soils in southeastern Utah. Land Degrad Develop 8:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowker MA (2007) Biological soil crust rehabilitation in theory and practice: an underexploited opportunity. Restoration Ecol 15:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenowitz S, Castenholz RW (1997) Long-term effects of UV and visible irradiance on natural populations of a scytonemin-containing cyanobacterium (Calothrix sp.). FEMS Microbiol Ecol 24:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buttars SM, St. Clair LL, Johansen JR, Sray JC, Payne MC, Webb BL, Terry RE, Pendleton BK, Warren SD (1998) Pelletized cyanobacterial soil amendments: laboratory testing for survival, escapability, and nitrogen fixation. Arid Soil Res Rehab 12:165–178Google Scholar
  7. Cabala J, Rahmonov O, Jablonska M, Teper E (2011) Soil algal colonization and its ecological role in an environment polluted by past Zn–Pb mining and smelting activity. Water Air Soil Pollution 215:339–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan LW, Lee HY, Heng PW (2006) Mechanisms of external and internal gelation and their impact on the functions of alginate as a coat and delivery system. Carbohydr Polym 63:176–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaudhary VB, Bowker MA, O’Dell TE, Grace JB, Redman AE, Rillig MC, Johnson NC (2009) Untangling the biological contributions to soil stability in semiarid shrublands. Ecol Appl 19:110–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen LZ, Xie ZM, Hu CX, Li DH, Wang GH, Liu YD (2006) Man-made desert algal crusts as affected by environmental factors in Inner Mongolia, China. J Arid Environ 67:521–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen LZ, Rossi F, Deng SQ, Liu YD, Wang GH, Adessi A, De Philippis R (2014) Macromolecular and chemical features of the excreted extracellular polysaccharides in induced biological soil crusts of different ages. Soil Biol Biochem 78:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colica G, Li H, Rossi F, Li DH, Liu YD, De Philippis R (2014) Microbial secreted exopolysaccharides affect the hydrological behavior of induced biological soil crusts in desert sandy soils. Soil Biol Biochem 68:62–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Colica G, Li H, Rossi F, De Philippis R, Liu YD (2015) Differentiation of the characteristics of excreted extracellular polysaccharides reveals the heterogeneous primary succession of induced biological soil crusts. J Appl Phycol 27:1935–1944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Vos J (1996) Testing compost as an anti wind erosion agent in a wind tunnel. Soil Technol 9:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eldridge D (1998) Trampling of microphytic crusts on calcareous soils, and its impact on erosion under rain-impacted flow. Catena 33:221–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fan S, Zhou L (2001) Desertification control in China: possible solutions. Ambio 30:384–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Garcia Pichel F, Castenholz RW (1991) Characterization and biological implications of scytonemin, a cyanobacterial sheath pigment. J Phycol 27:395–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geist H (2005) The causes and progression of desertification. Ashgate studies in environmental policy and practice. Ashgate Publishing Limited, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  19. Harper KT, Belnap J (2001) The influence of biological soil crusts on mineral uptake by associated vascular plants. J Arid Environ 47:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawkes CV (2003) Nitrogen cycling mediated by biological soil crusts and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ecology 84:1553–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hellden U 2003 Desertification and theories of desertification control: a discussion of Chinese and European concepts. In: China-EU Workshop on Integrated Approach to Combat Desertification, Beijing, Ministry of Science and Technology of China, China Association for International Science and Technology Cooperation, pp 94–104Google Scholar
  22. Housman DC, Powers HH, Collins AD, Belnap J (2006) Carbon and nitrogen fixation differ between successional stages of biological soil crusts in the Colorado Plateau and Chihuahuan Desert. J Arid Environ 66:620–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu CX, Liu YD, Song LR, Zhang DK (2002) Effect of desert soil algae on the stabilization of fine sands. J Appl Phycol 14:281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu CX, Liu YD, Paulsen BS, Petersen D, Klaveness B (2003) Extracellular carbohydrate polymers from five desert soil algae with different cohesion in the stabilization of fine sand grain. Carbohydr Polym 54:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lahalih SM, Ahmed N (1998) Effect of new soil stabilizers on the compressive strength of dune sand. Construct Build Mat 12:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lan SB, Wu L, Zhang DL, Hu CX, Liu YD (2010) Effects of drought and salt stresses on man-made cyanobacterial crusts. Eur J Soil Biol 46:381–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lan SB, Zhang QY, Wu L, Liu YD, Zhang DL, Hu CX (2014) Artificially accelerating the reversal of desertification: cyanobacterial inoculation facilitates the succession of vegetation communities. Environ Sci Technol 48:307–315Google Scholar
  28. Li X, Zhou H, Wang X, Zhu Y, O’conner P (2003) The effects of sand stabilization and revegetation on cryptogam species diversity and soil fertility in the Tengger Desert, Northern China. Plant Soil 251:237–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu J, Shi B, Lu Y, Jiang H, Huang H, Wang G, Kamai T (2012) Effectiveness of a new organic polymer sand-fixing agent on sand fixation. Environ Earth Sci 65:589–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lowdermilk WC (1939) Conquest of the land through seven thousand years. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Maestre FT et al (2011) Ecology and functional roles of biological soil crusts in semi-arid ecosystems of Spain. J Arid Environ 75:1282–1291CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Mager DM, Thomas AD (2011) Extracellular polysaccharides from cyanobacterial soil crusts: a review of their role in dryland soil processes. J Arid Environ 75:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazor G, Kidron GJ, Vonshak A, Abeliovich A (1996) The role of cyanobacterial exopolysaccharides in structuring desert microbial crusts. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 21:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miao LJ, Moore JC, Zeng FJ, Lei JQ, Ding JL, He B, Cui XF (2015) Footprint of research in desertification management in China. Land Degrad Develop 26:450–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mukherjee S, Chakraborty D (2015) Environmental challenges and governance: diverse perspectives from Asia. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Rao BQ, Liu YD, Lan SB, Wu PP, Wang WB, Li DH (2012) Effects of sand burial stress on the early developments of cyanobacterial crusts in the field. Eur J Soil Biol 48:48–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Read CF, Duncan DH, Vesk PA, Elith J (2011) Surprisingly fast recovery of biological soil crusts following livestock removal in southern Australia. J Vegetation Sci 22:905–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reynolds JF et al (2007) Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science 316:847–851CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rhim JW (2004) Physical and mechanical properties of water resistant sodium alginate films. Lebensm Wissensch Technol 37:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossi F, Potrafka RM, Pichel FG, De Philippis R (2012) The role of the exopolysaccharides in enhancing hydraulic conductivity of biological soil crusts. Soil Biol Biochem 46:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Siddiqi RA, Moore JC (1981) Polymer stabilization of sandy soils for erosion control. Transp Res Rec:30–34Google Scholar
  42. Starks TL, Shubert LE, Trainor F (1981) Ecology of soil algae: a review. Phycologia 20:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang WB, Liu YD, Li DH, Hu CX, Rao BQ (2009) Feasibility of cyanobacterial inoculation for biological soil crusts formation in desert area. Soil Biol Biochem 41:926–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. West NE (1990) Structure and functions of microphytic soil crusts in wildland ecosystems of arid to semi-arid regions. Adv Ecol Res 20:179–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitford WG (2002) Ecology of desert systems. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Wu YW, Rao BQ, Wu PP, Liu YD, Li GB, Li DH (2013) Development of artificially induced biological soil crusts in fields and their effects on top soil. Plant Soil 370:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xie ZM, Liu YD, Hua CX, Chen LZ, Li DH (2007) Relationships between the biomass of algal crusts in fields and their compressive strength. Soil Biol Biochem 39:567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yan F, Wu B, Wang Y (2015) Estimating spatiotemporal patterns of aboveground biomass using Landsat TM and MODIS images in the Mu Us Sandy land, China. Agric Forest Meteorol 200:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang J, Wang F, Fang L, Tan TW (2007) Synthesis, characterization and application of a novel chemical sand-fixing agent-poly (aspartic acid) and its composites. Environ Pollut 149:125–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao Y, Xu M, Belnap J (2010) Potential nitrogen fixation activity of different aged biological soil crusts from rehabilitated grasslands of the hilly Loess Plateau, China. J Arid Environ 74:1186–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chengrong Peng
    • 1
  • Jiaoli Zheng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shun Huang
    • 1
  • Shuangshuang Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dunhai Li
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mingyu Cheng
    • 3
  • Yongding Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Algal Biology, Institute of HydrobiologyChinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Qinghai Bei Xiang Municipal Investment CorporationXiningChina

Personalised recommendations