Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 1145–1157 | Cite as

Effects of cell motility and morphology on the rheology of algae suspensions

  • N. Cagney
  • T. Zhang
  • R. Bransgrove
  • M. J. Allen
  • S. BalabaniEmail author
Article

Abstract

Algae have been proposed as a source of biofuels and high value chemical products, but if this potential is to be fully realised, it is crucial to understand the factors affecting the suspension rheology. Suspensions of three algae species, Tetraselmis chuii, Chlorella sp. and Phaeodactylum tricornutum, were sheared in a rotational rheometer in order to characterise their rheology and examine the effects of cell concentration, motility and morphology. The volume fraction ranged from 0.05 to 0.2, and the shear rate from 20 to 200 s−1. The rheology measurements are fitted to the Herschel-Bulkley model, and the intrinsic viscosity is estimated using both Einstein’s equation and the Krieger-Dougherty model, which are found to perform well for low concentrations. The intrinsic viscosity of T. chuii suspensions is shown not to be constant, but decreases with strain rate, indicating that the suspension viscosity is less sensitive to the cell concentration at high strain rates. The rate of decline is constant for strain rates below approximately 100 s−1, after which it continues to decline linearly, but at a slower rate. It is speculated that this transition at 100 s−1 is related to the appearance of flocculation at low strain rates. The effect of the cell motility on the rheology of T. chuii suspensions is investigated by comparing the rheology of motile and passive cells. The shear-thinning behaviour is absent and the effective viscosity is considerably lower for the passive cell suspensions, indicating that the motility of the T. chuii cells causes them to align to resist the flow. In contrast, the Chlorella sp. suspensions exhibit shear-thickening behaviour, which has not previously been reported. Finally, the influence of the effective aspect ratio on the cell suspensions is examined by comparing the intrinsic viscosity of all three species. The algal species with the largest aspect ratio, P. tricornutum, has the largest intrinsic viscosity, while the smallest aspect ratio strain, Chlorella sp., has the smallest viscosity. However, it is shown that the increase in viscosity of motile compared to non-motile T. chuii suspensions cannot be attributed to a change in the effective aspect ratio of individual cells due to the motion of the flagella alone.

Keywords

Algae suspension Effective viscosity Non-Newtonian Cell motility Cell morphology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by a grant awarded from the Innovate UK (formerly known as Technology Strategy Board) (TSB 4783-44269). The authors would like to thank Dr. Efstathios Kaliviotis for helpful discussions regarding the rheometer measurements.

References

  1. Adesanya VO, Vadillo DC, Mackley MR (2012) The rheological characterization of algae suspensions for the production of biofuels. J Rheol 56:925–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey JM, Neish AC (1954) Starch synthesis in Chlorella vulgaris. Can J Biochem Phys 32(4):452–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes HA (1989) Shear-thickening (“dilatancy”) in suspensions of nonaggregating solid particles dispersed in Newtonian liquids. J Rheol 33:329–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes HA (1995) A review of the slip (wall depletion) of polymer solutions, emulsions and particle suspensions in viscometers: its cause, character, and cure. J Non-Newon Fluid 56:221–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes HA, Hutton JF, Walters K (1989) An introduction to rheology, vol 3. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. Borowitzka MA (2013) High-value products from microalgae—their development and commercialisation. J Appl Phycol 25:743–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borowitzka MA, Volcani BE (1978) The polymorphic diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum: Ultrastructure of its morphotypes. J Phycol 14:10–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borowitzka MA, Moheimani NR (2013) Sustainable biofuels from algae. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 18:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buscall R (2010) Letter to the Editor: wall slip in dispersion rheology. J Rheol 54:1177–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chengwu Z, Hongjun H (2002) Taxonomy and ultrastructure of five species of Tetraselmis (Prasinophyceae) isolated from China seas. Acta Oceanol Sinica 24:557–579Google Scholar
  11. Esser AE, Grossmann S (1996) Analytic expression for Taylor-Couette stability boundary. Phys Fluids 8:1814–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fields CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Falkowski Randerson P J T (1998) Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281:237–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foffano G, Lintuvuori JS, Morozov AN, Stratford K, Cates ME, Marenduzzo D (2012) Bulk rheology and microrheology of active fluids. Euro Phys J E 35:98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Genovese DB (2012) Shear rheology of hard sphere, dispersed and aggregated suspensions, and filler-matrix composites. Adv Colloid Interfac 171:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giomi L, Liverpool TB, Marchetti MC (2010) Sheared active fluids: Thickening, thinning, and vanishing viscosity. Phys Rev E 81:051–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldstein RE (2015) Green algae as model organisms for biological fluid dynamics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 47:343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Grima EM, Belarbi EH, Fernández F A, Medina AR, Chisti Y (2003) Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics. Biotechnol Adv 20:491–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guillard RRL, Ryther JH (1962) Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: i. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea. (Cleve) Gran. Can J Microbiol 8:229–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamilton ML, Haslam RP, Napier JA, Sayanova O (2014) Metabolic engineering of Phaeodactylum tricornutum for the enhanced accumulation of omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Metabolic Engineering 22:3–9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hatwalne Y, Ramaswamy S, Rao M, Simha RA (2004) Rheology of active-particle suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 92(11). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.118101
  21. Hatzikiriakos SG (2015) Slip mechanisms in complex fluid flows. Soft Matter 11:7851–7856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaplan D, Christiaen D, Arad S (1987) Chelating properties of extracellular polysaccharides from Chlorella sp. Appl Environ Microb 53:2953–2956Google Scholar
  23. Mueller S, Llewellin EW, Mader HM (2009) The rheology of suspensions of solid particles. Proc R Soc A 466:1201–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mussler M, Rafaï S, Peyla P, Wagner C (2013) Effective viscosity of non-gravitactic Chlamydomonas reinhardtii microswimmer suspensions. Eur Phys Lett 101:54004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quemada D (1998) Rheological modelling of complex fluids. I. The concept of effective volume fraction revisited. Eur Phys J-Appl Phys 1:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Darzins A, Posewitz MC (2010) Genetic engineering of algae for enhanced biofuel production. Eukaryot Cell 9:486–501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Rafaï S, Jibuti L, Peyla P (2010) Effective viscosity of microswimmer suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 104:098102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sherwood JM, Dusting J, Kaliviotis E, Balabani S (2012) The effect of red blood cell aggregation on velocity and cell-depleted layer characteristics of blood in a bifurcating microchannel. Biomicrofluidics 6(2):024119CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Smayda TJ (1997) Harmful algal blooms: Their ecophysiology and general relevance to phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Limnol Oceanogr 42:1137–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sokolov A, Aranson IS (2009) Reduction of viscosity in suspension of swimming bacteria. Phys Rev Lett 148(14):101Google Scholar
  32. Soulies A, Pruvost J, Legrand J, Castelain C, Burghelea TI (2013) Rheological properties of suspensions of the green microalga Chlorella vulgaris at various volume fractions. Rheol Acta 52 :589–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stickel JJ, Powell RL (2005) Fluid mechanics and rheology of dense suspensions. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 37:129–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tesson B, Gaillard C, Martin-Jézéquel V (2009) Insights into the polymorphism of the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin. Bot Mar 52:104–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trainor FR (1965) Motility in Scenedesmus cultures incubated in nature. Bull Torrey Bot Club 92:329–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Walker DA (2009) Biofuels, facts, fantasy, and feasibility. J Appl Phycol 21:509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wileman A, Ozhan A, Berberoglu H (2012) Rheological properties of algae slurries for minimizing harvesting energy requirements in biofuel production. Bioresource Technol 104:432–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu ZY, Shi XM (2008) Rheological properties of Chlorella pyrenoidosa culture grown heterotrophically in a fermentor. J Appl Phycol 20:279–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang X, Jiang Z, Chen L, Chou A, Yan H, Zou YY, Zhang X (2013) Influence of cell properties on rheological characterization of microalgae suspensions. Bioresource Technol 139:209–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Cagney
    • 1
  • T. Zhang
    • 2
  • R. Bransgrove
    • 3
  • M. J. Allen
    • 3
  • S. Balabani
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Plymouth Marine LaboratoryPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations