Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 1057–1067 | Cite as

Assessing in vivo digestibility and effects on immune system of sheep fed alfalfa hay supplemented with a fixed amount of Ulva rigida and Gracilaria vermiculophylla

  • Ana R. J. CabritaEmail author
  • Alexandra Correia
  • Ana R. Rodrigues
  • Paulo P. Cortez
  • Manuel Vilanova
  • António J.M. Fonseca
Article

Abstract

Ruminants could be the most suitable domestic animals to be supplemented with seaweeds as the rumen ecosystem might provide the animal the ability to use these feed resources by breaking down the complex polysaccharides. The objective of the present in vivo study was to determine the digestibility and the effects on the immune system of one green (Ulva rigida) and one red (Gracilaria vermiculophylla) seaweed cultivated in an integrated multitrophic aquaculture system (IMTA) and included in the diet of sheep at a supplementing level up to 25%. Both seaweeds showed lower dry matter digestibilitity than alfalfa hay, the organic matter digestibility of U. rigida being higher than that of G. vermiculophylla. The studied seaweeds had similar fiber and energy digestibility. Seaweed supplementation did not influence hematological parameters, reactive oxygen species production by neutrophils, nor lymphocytic response to T and B cells mitogens. The low fiber digestibility of selected seaweeds would be the major constraint to their use in high amounts in ruminant diets. Dietary seaweed supplementation has no deleterious effect on the immune function of cells mediating innate and acquired immunity.

Keywords

Digestibility Immunity Seaweeds Sheep 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work received financial support from the European Union (FEDER funds through COMPETE) and National Funds (FCT) through projects EXPL/CVT-NUT/0286/2013 - FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-041111 and UID/QUI/50006/2013 - POCI/01/0145/FERDER/007265 (LAQV). To all financing sources, the authors are greatly indebted. The authors also acknowledge Sílvia Azevedo (ICBAS-UP) for the valuable technical assistance.

Compliance with ethical standards

The present experiment was conducted at the Clinical and Veterinary Investigation Center of Vairão (Vila do Conde, Portugal) from the Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), in strict accordance with good animal practice as defined by national authorities and European Union Directive 2010/63/EU. The experimental animal procedures were approved by the Local Animal Ethics Committee of ICBAS-UP, licensed by the Portuguese Directorate-General of Food and Veterinary Medicine (Direção Geral de Alimentação e Veterinária) of the Ministry for Agriculture and Sea (Ministério da Agricultura e do Mar), and conducted by trained scientists following FELASA category C recommendations. All methods and procedures were performed following the established guidelines from these institutions.

References

  1. Abreu MH, Pereira R, Buschmann AH, Sousa-Pinto I, Yarish C (2011a) Nitrogen uptake responses of Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Ohmi) Papenfuss under combined and single addition of nitrate and ammonium. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 407:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abreu MH, Pereira R, Sousa-Pinto I, Yarish C (2011b) Ecophysiological studies of the non-indigenous species Gracilaria vermiculophylla (Rhodophyta) and its abundance patterns in Ria de Aveiro lagoon, Portugal. Eur J Phycol 46:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abreu MH, Varela DA, Henríquez L, Villarroel A, Yarish C, Sousa-Pinto I, Buschmann AH (2009) Traditional vs. integrated multi-trophic aquaculture of Gracilaria chilensis C. J. Bird, J. McLachlan & E. C. Oliveira: productivity and physiological performance. Aquaculture 293:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed S, Minuti A, Bani P (2013) In vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of some naturally occurring and synthetic sugars. Ital J Anim Sci 12:359–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amulic B, Cazalet C, Hayes GL, Metzler KD, Zychlinsky A (2012) Neutrophil function: from mechanisms to disease. Annu Rev Immunol 30:459–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrieux C, Hibert A, Houari AM, Bensaada M, Popot F, Szylit O (1998) Ulva lactuca is poorly fermented but alters bacterial metabolism in rats inoculated with human fecal flora from methane and non-methane producers. J Sci Food Agric 77:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Angell AR, Mata L, Nys R, Paul NA (2016) The protein content of seaweeds: a universal nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of five. J Appl Phycol 28:511–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. AOAC (1990) Official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Arieli A, Sklan D, Kissil G (1993) A note on the nutritive value of Ulva lactuca for ruminants. Anim Sci 57:329.331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Azevedo G, Domingues B, Abreu H, Sousa-Pinto I, Feio G, Hilliou L (2015) Impact of cultivation of Mastocarpus stellatus in IMTA on the seaweeds chemistry and hybrid carrageenan properties. Carbohyd Polym 116:140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Balasse M, Tresset A, Dobney K, Ambrose SH (2005) The use of isotope ratios to test for seaweed eating in sheep. J Zool 266:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barbeyron T, Lerat Y, Sassi JF, Le Panse S, Helbert W, Collén PN (2011) Persicivirga ulvanivorans sp. nov., a marine member of the family Flavobacteriaceae that degrades ulvan from green algae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:1899–1905CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cabrita ARJ, Maia MRG, Oliveira HM, Sousa-Pinto I, Almeida AA, Pinto E, Fonseca AJM (2016) Tracing seaweeds as mineral sources for farm-animals. J Appl Phycol 28:3135–3150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cao YZ, Maddox JF, Mastro AM, Scholz RW, Hildenbrandt G, Reddy CC (1992) Selenium deficiency alters the lipoxygenase pathway and mitogenic response in bovine lymphocytes. J Nutr 122:2121–2127PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Caroprese M, Ciliberti MG, Annicchiarico G, Albenzio M, Muscio A, Sevi A (2014) Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation and immune regulation in heat-stressed sheep after supplementation with polyunsaturated fatty acids. J Dairy Sci 97:4247–4258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Carvalho LPF, Melo DSP, Pereira CRM, Rodrigues MAM, Cabrita ARJ, Fonseca AJM (2005) Chemical composition, in vivo digestibility, N degradability and enzymatic intestinal digestibility of five protein supplements. Anim Feed Sci Technol 119:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ciliberti MG, Albenzio M, Annicchiarico G, Sevi A, Muscio A, Caroprese M (2015) Alterations in sheep peripheral blood mononuclear cell proliferation and cytokine release by polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in the diet under high ambient temperature. J Dairy Sci 98:872–879CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Collén PN, Sassi J-F, Rogniaux H, Marfaing H, Helbert W (2011) Ulvan lyases isolated from the Flavobacteria Persicivirga ulvanivorans are the first members of a new polysaccharide lyase family. Journal Biol Chem 286:42063–42071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Correc G, Hehemann J-H, Czjzek M, Helbert W (2011) Structural analysis of the degradation products of porphyran digested by Zobellia galactanivorans β-porphyranase a. Carbohydr Polym 83:277–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cronin G, Hay M (1996) Within-plant variation in seaweed palatability and chemical defenses: optimal defense theory versus the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis. Oecologia 105:361–368CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. de Paula Silva PH, McBride S, de Nys R, Paul NA (2008) Integrating filamentous ‘green tide’ algae into tropical pond-based aquaculture. Aquaculture 284:74–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Domingues B, Abreu M, Sousa-Pinto I (2015) On the bioremediation efficiency of Mastocarpus stellatus (Stackhouse) Guiry, in an integrated multi-trophic aquaculture system. J Appl Phycol 27:1289–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Domozych DS, Ciancia M, Fangel JU, Mikkelsen MD, Ulvskov P, Willats WGT (2012) The cell walls of green algae: a journey through evolution and diversity. Front Plant Sci 3:82CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Droke EA, Spears JW (1993) In vitro and in vivo immunological measurements in growing lambs fed diets deficient, marginal or adequate in zinc. J Nutr Immunol 2:71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Esteban-Redondo I, Innes EA (1997) Toxoplasma gondii infection in sheep and cattle. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 20:191–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Farenzena R, Kozloski GV, Gindri M, Stefanello S (2016) Minimum length of the adaptation and collection period in digestibility trials with sheep fed ad libitum only forage or forage plus concentrate. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12550 Google Scholar
  27. FEDNA (2010) Tablas FEDNA de composición y valor nutritivo de alimentos para la fabricación de piensos compuestos, 3ª edición edn. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal, MadridGoogle Scholar
  28. Felix N, Brindo RA (2014) Evaluation of raw and fermented seaweed, Ulva lactuca as feed ingredient in giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. International J Fish Aquat Stud 1:199–204Google Scholar
  29. Fonseca AJM, Dias-da-Silva AA, Ørskov ER (1998) In sacco degradation characteristics as predictors of digestibility and voluntary intake of roughages by mature ewes. Anim Feed Sci Technol 72:205–219Google Scholar
  30. Graham SP, Jones GE, MacLean M, Livingstone M, Entrican G (1995) Recombinant ovine interferon gamma inhibits the multiplication of Chlamydia psittaci in ovine cells. J Comp Pathol 112:185–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hansen HR, Hector BL, Feldmann J (2003) A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the seaweed diet of north Ronaldsay sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 105:21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hehemann JH, Correc G, Barbeyron T, Helbert W, Czjzek M, Michel G (2010) Transfer of carbohydrate-active enzymes from marine bacteria to Japanese gut microbiota. Nature 464:908–912CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hind Z, Rabah A, Christelle B, Hacène B, Yves B (2014) Chemical and biological evaluation of the nutritive value of Algerian green seaweed Ulva lactuca using in vitro gas production technique for ruminant animals. Int J Adv Res 2:916–925Google Scholar
  34. Imbs AB, Latyshev NA, Svetashev VI, Skriptsova AV, Le TT, Pham MQ, Nguyen VS, Pham LQ (2012) Distribution of polyunsaturated fatty acids in red algae of the genus Gracilaria, a promising source of prostaglandins. Russ J Mar Biol 38:339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ito K, Hori K (1989) Seaweed: chemical composition and potential foods uses. Food Rev Int 5:101–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jeon HJ, Choi HS, Lee OH, Jeon YJ, Lee BY (2012) Inhibition of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) by Gelidium elegans using alternative drying and extraction conditions in 3 T3-L1 and RAW 264.7 cells. Prev Nutr Food Sci 17:122–128CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Jeon HJ, Seo MJ, Choi HS, Lee OH, Lee BY (2014) Gelidium elegans, an edible red seaweed, and hesperidin inhibit lipid accumulation and production of reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species in 3 T3-L1 and RAW264.7 cells. Phytother Res 28:1701–1709CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jiménez-Escrig A, Sánchez-Muniz F (2000) Dietary fibre from edible seaweeds: chemical structure, physicochemical properties and effects on cholesterol metabolism. J Nutr Res 20:585–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kannan G, Saker KE, Terrill TH, Kouakou B, Galipalli S, Gelaye S (2007) Effect of seaweed extract supplementation in goats exposed to simulated preslaughter stress. Small Ruminant Res 73:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Khairy HM, El-Shafay SM (2013) Seasonal variations in the biochemical composition of some common seaweed species from the coast of Abu Qir Bay, Alexandria, Egypt. Oceanologia 55:435–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kumar CS, Ganesan P, Suresh PV, Bhaskar N (2008) Seaweeds as a source of nutritionally beneficial compounds - a review. J Food Sci Tech Mys 45:1–13Google Scholar
  42. Lawton RJ, Mata L, de Nys R, Paul NA (2013) Algal bioremediation of waste waters from land-based aquaculture using Ulva: selecting target species and strains. PLoS One 8(10):e77344CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Makkar HPS, Tran G, Heuzé V, Giger-Reverdin S, Lessire M, Lebas F, Ankers P (2016) Seaweeds for livestock diets: a review. Anim Feed Sci Technol 212:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mata L, Schuenhoff A, Santos R (2010) A direct comparison of the performance of the seaweed biofilters, Asparagopsis armata and Ulva rigida. J Appl Phycol 22:639–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Michel G, Nyval-Collen P, Barbeyron T, Czjzek M, Helbert W (2006) Bioconversion of red seaweed galactans: a focus on bacterial agarases and carrageenases. Appl Microbiol Biot 71:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mišurcová L (2011) Chemical composition of seaweeds. In: Kim S-K (ed) Handbook of marine macroalgae: biotechnology and applied phycology. John Wiley, NY, pp. 171–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mouritsen OG, Dawczynski C, Duelund L, Jahreis G, Vetter W, Schröder M (2013) On the human consumption of the red seaweed dulse (Palmaria palmata (L.) Weber & Mohr). J Appl Phycol 25:1777–1791Google Scholar
  48. Nagalakshmi D, Dhanalakshmi K, Himabindu D (2009) Effect of dose and source of supplemental zinc on immune response and oxidative enzymes in lambs. Vet Res Commun 33:631–644Google Scholar
  49. Neori A, Chopin T, Troell M, Buschmann AH, Kraemer GP, Halling C, Shpigel M, Yarish C (2004) Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 231:361–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oltenacu PA, Algers B (2005) Selection for increased production and the welfare of dairy cows: are new breeding goals needed? Ambio 34:311–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Orpin CG, Greenwood Y, Hall FJ, Paterson IW (1985) The rumen microbiology of seaweed digestion in Orkney sheep. J Appl Bacteriol 58:585–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Peña-Rodríguez A, Mawhinney TP, Ricque-Marie D, Cruz-Suárez LE (2011) Chemical composition of cultivated seaweed Ulva clathrata (Roth) C. Agardh. Food Chem 129:491–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pereira L, Amado AM, Critchley AT, van de Velde F, Ribeiro-Claro PJA (2009) Identification of selected seaweed polysaccharides (phycocolloids) by vibrational spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR and FT-Raman). Food Hydrocolloid 23:1903–1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ramnani P, Chitarrari R, Tuohy K, Grant J, Hotchkiss S, Philp K, Campbell R, Gill C, Rowland I (2012) In vitro fermentation and prebiotic potential of novel low molecular weight polysaccharides derived from agar and alginate seaweeds. Anaerobe 18:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Rey-Crespo F, López-Alonso M, Miranda M (2014) The use of seaweed from the Galician coast as a mineral supplement in organic dairy cattle. Animal 8:580–586CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ (1981) The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In: James WPT, Theander O (eds) The analysis of dietary fiber in food. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY, pp. 123–158Google Scholar
  57. Rupérez P (2002) Mineral content of edible marine seaweeds. Food Chem 79:23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rymer C (2000) The measurement of forage digestibility in vivo. In: Givens DI, Owen E, Omed HM, Axford RFE (eds) Forage evaluation in ruminant nutrition. CAB International, Wallingford, p. 113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Saker KE, Fike JH, Veit H, Ward DL (2004) Brown seaweed - (Tasco) treated conserved forage enhances antioxidant status and immune function in heat-stressed wether lambs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 88:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Santos SA, Vilela C, Freire CS, Abreu MH, Rocha SM, Silvestre AJ (2015) Chlorophyta and Rhodophyta macroalgae: a source of health promoting phytochemicals. Food Chem 183:122–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Schuenhoff A, Shpigel M, Lupatsch I, Ashkenazi A, Msuya FE, Neori A (2003) A semi-recirculating, integrated system for the culture of fish and seaweed. Aquaculture 221:167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shields RJ, Lupatsch I (2012) Algae for aquaculture and animal feeds. Technikfolgenabschätzung-Theorie und Praxis 21:23–37Google Scholar
  63. Silva DM, Valente LMP, Sousa-Pinto I, Pereira R, Pires MA, Seixas F, Rema P (2015) Evaluation of IMTA-produced seaweeds (Gracilaria, Porphyra, and Ulva) as dietary ingredients in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L., juveniles. Effects on growth performance and gut histology. J Appl Phycol 27:1671–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spears JW, Kegley EB (2002) Effect of zinc source (zinc oxide vs zinc proteinate) and level on performance, carcass characteristics, and immune response of growing and finishing steers. J Anim Sci 80:2747–2752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  66. Turner RJ, Finch JM (1990) Immunological malfunctions associated with low selenium-vitamin E diets in lambs. J Comp Pathol 102:99–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. van Ginneken VJ, Helsper JP, de Visser W, van Keulen H, Brandenburg WA (2011) Polyunsaturated fatty acids in various macroalgal species from North Atlantic and tropical seas. Lipids Health Dis 10:104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Ventura MR, Castañón JIR (1998) The nutritive value of seaweed (Ulva lactuca) for goats. Small Ruminant Res 29:325–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wattegedera S, Sills K, Howard CJ, Hope JC, McInnes CJ, Entrican G (2004) Variability in cytokine production and cell proliferation by mitogen-activated ovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells: modulation by interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-12. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 102:67–76CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Williams AG, Withers S, Sutherland AD (2013) The potential of bacteria isolated from ruminal contents of seaweed-eating North Ronaldsay sheep to hydrolyse seaweed components and produce methane by anaerobic digestion in vitro. Microb Biotech 6:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yarish C, Pereira R (2008) Mass production of marine macroalgae. In: Jørgensen SE, Fath BD (eds) Ecological engineering. Encyclopedia of Ecology, vol 3. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 2236–2247Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana R. J. Cabrita
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alexandra Correia
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ana R. Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Paulo P. Cortez
    • 3
  • Manuel Vilanova
    • 2
    • 3
  • António J.M. Fonseca
    • 1
  1. 1.REQUIMTE, LAQV, ICBAS, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel SalazarUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.I3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, IBMC, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e CelularUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.ICBAS - Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel SalazarUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations