Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 223–233 | Cite as

Aqueous silica removal from agricultural drainage water and reverse osmosis concentrate by brackish water diatoms in semi-batch photobioreactors

  • Keisuke IkehataEmail author
  • Yuanyuan Zhao
  • Nima Maleky
  • Andrew T. Komor
  • Michael A. Anderson


A novel aqueous silica removal process using naturally occurring diatoms for water and wastewater treatment, in particular water reuse and desalination, was developed. Brackish agricultural drainage water containing 39 mg L−1 of total silica and 10 g L−1 of total dissolved solids was used as a source of silica-assimilating diatoms. The drainage water was statically incubated in 500-mL and 7.5-L photobioreactors at 27 ± 2 °C under continuous illumination using two 13-W compact fluorescent light bulbs as a light source. After 10 days, brown algal biomass became noticeable and silica removal started to occur. Silica removal accelerated as algal biomass accumulated. In the fourth semi-batch cycle, more than 95 % of molybdate reactive silica was removed within 28 h. Removal of nonreactive silica was also confirmed. Reverse osmosis concentrate samples from advanced water reclamation facilities with high silica concentration (>120 mg L−1) were also tested. More than 75 % of silica was removed within 6 days. Microscopic analysis revealed the presence of Pseudostaurosira, Nitzschia, and Halamphora species in the photobioreactors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the use of diatoms for aqueous silica removal in water treatment.


Diatoms Photobioreactor Silica Brackish water Desalination Water reuse 



The authors would like to thank Dr. John P. Smol from Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada, and Mr. Paul B. Hamilton from Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, ON, Canada, for their kind helps with preliminary diatom identification. The authors would also like to thank Dr. Kenneth P. Ishida and Mr. Donald W. Phipps from the Orange County Water District, Fountain Valley, CA, and Dr. Cathy Chang and Dr. Paul Fu from the Water Replenishment District of Southern California, Lakewood, CA, for providing RO concentrate samples and valuable information and suggestions. Assistance of Ms. Kelly M. Huston, Ms. Yao (Fiona) Jin, and Yuan (Abby) Li, Pacific Advanced Civil Engineering, Inc., Fountain Valley, CA, is also gratefully acknowledged. This work was financially supported by Pacific Advanced Civil Engineering, Inc.

Conflict of interest

Two of the authors (Keisuke Ikehata and Andrew T. Komor) have applied for a US patent (application no. 20120175301) based on this discovery. The authors declare that there is no other conflict of interest.


  1. APHA, AWWA, and WEF (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater, 21st edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, pp. 4-164–4-165Google Scholar
  2. AWWA (2010) Algae: source to treatment—manual of water supply practices – M57, 1st edn. American Water Works Association (AWWA), Denver, p. 219Google Scholar
  3. Asano T, Burton FL, Leverenz HL, Tsuchihashi R, Tchobanoglous G (2007) Water reuse: issues, technologies, and applications. McGraw-Hill, NY, pp. 487–492Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury J (2004) Nature’s nanotechnologists: unveiling the secret of diatoms. PLoS Biol 10:306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bien GS, Contois DE, Thomas WH (1958) The removal of soluble silica from fresh water entering the sea. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 14:35–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behrman AS, Gustafson H (1940) Removal of silica from water. Ind Eng Chem 4:468–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borowitzka MA (1987) Calcification in algae: mechanisms and the role of metabolism. CRC Crit Rev in Plant Sci 6:1–45Google Scholar
  8. Bozarth A, Maier U-G, Zauner S (2009) Diatoms in biotechnology: modern tools and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82:195–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Caron DA, Garneau ME, Seubert E, Howard MD, Darjany L, Schnetzer A, Cetinić I, Filteau G, Lauri P, Jones B, Trussell S (2010) Harmful algae and their potential impacts on desalination operations off southern California. Water Res 42:385–416Google Scholar
  10. Crittenden JC, Trussel RR, Hand DW, Howe KJ, Tchobanoglous G (2005) Water treatment: principles and design, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, pp. 1592–1616Google Scholar
  11. Egge JK, Aksnes DL (1992) Silicate as regulating nutrient in phytoplankton competition. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 83:281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finkel ZV (2016) Silicification in the microalgae. In: Borowitzka MA, Beardall J, Raven JA (eds) The physiology of microalgae. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 289–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gallego S, del Vigo F, Chesters S (2008) Practical experience with high silica concentration in RO waters. Proc. WIM 2008 International Congress on Water Management in the Mining Industry, Santiago, Chile, July 9–11, 2008Google Scholar
  14. Gilpina LC, Davidson K, Roberts E (2004) The influence of changes in nitrogen: silicon ratios on diatom growth dynamics. J Sea Res 51:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gordon R (2010) Diatoms and nanotechnology: early history and imagined future as seen through patents. In: Smol JP, Stoermer EF (eds) The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 590–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenleea LF, Lawlerb DF, Freemana BD, Marrotc B, Moulin P (2009) Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Res 43:2317–2348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grogera C, Sumper BM, Brunner E (2008) Silicon uptake and metabolism of the marine diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: solid-state 29Si NMR and fluorescence microscopic studies. J Struct Biol 161:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grossart HP, Czub G, Simon M (2006) Algae-bacteria interactions and their effects on aggregation and organic matter flux in the sea. Environ Microbiol 8:1074–1084Google Scholar
  19. Harrison PJ, Conway HL, Dugdale RC (1976) Marine diatoms grown in chemostats under silicate or ammonium limitation. I. Cellular chemical composition and steady-state growth kinetics of Skeletonema costatum. Mar Biol 35:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper HE, Knoll AH (1975) Silica, diatoms, and cenozoic radiolarian evolution. Geology 14:175–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iler RK (1979) The chemistry of silica—solubility, polymerization, colloid and surface properties, and biochemistry. John Wiley & Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  22. Kociolek P (2011) Nitzschia amphibia. Diatoms of the United States. Accessed 9 Feb 2016
  23. Kang G, Cao Y (2012) Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: a review. Water Res 46:584–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee KP, Arnot TC, Mattia D (2011) A review of reverse osmosis membrane materials for desalination—development to date and future potential. J Membr Sci 370:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee RE (2008) Phycology. Chapter 17. Heterokontophyta. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 360–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewin JC (1954) Silicon metabolism in diatoms. I. Evidence for the role of reduced sulfur compounds in silicon utilization. J Gen Physiol 37:589–599CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim GW, Lim JK, Ahmad AL, Chan DJC (2015) Influences of diatom frustule morphologies on protein adsorption behavior. J Appl Phycol 27:763–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin-Jézéquel V, Hildebrand M, Brzezinski MA (2000) Silicon metabolism in diatoms: implications for growth. J Phycol 36:821–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matin A, Khan Z, Zaidi SMJ, Boyce MC (2011) Biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes for seawater desalination: phenomena and prevention. Desalination 281:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCree KJ (1972) Test of current definitions of photosynthetically active radiation against leaf photosynthesis data. Agric Meteorol 10:443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morales EA (2001) Morphological studies in selected fragilarioid diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) from Connecticut waters (U.S.A.). Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia 151:105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ning RY (2002) Discussion of silica speciation, fouling, control and maximum reduction. Desalination 151:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nassif N, Livage J (2011) From diatoms to silica-based biohybrids. Chem Soc Rev 40:849–859CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Paasche E (1973a) Silicon and the ecology of marine plankton diatoms. I. Thalassiosira pseudonana (Cyclotella nana) grown in a chemostat with silicate as limiting nutrient. Mar Biol 19:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paasche E (1973b) Silicon and the ecology of marine plankton diatoms. II. Silicate uptake kinetics in five diatom species. Mar Biol 19:262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Perez-Gonzalez A, Urtiaga AM, Ibanez R, Ortiz I (2012) State of the art and review on the treatment technologies of water reverse osmosis concentrates. Water Res 46:267–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sumper M, Brunner E (2006) Learning from diatoms: nature’s tools for the production of nanostructured silica. Adv Funct Mater 16:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spaulding S, Edlund M (2008) Pseudostaurosira. Diatoms of the United States. Accessed 9 Feb 2016
  39. Stepanek J, Kociolek P (2010) Halamphora veneta. Diatoms of the United States. Accessed 9 Feb 2016
  40. Villacorte LO, Ekowati Y, Winters H, Amy GL, Schippers JC, Kennedy MD (2013) Characterisation of transparent exopolymer particles (TEP) produced during algal bloom: a membrane treatment perspective. Desalin Water Treat 51:1021–1033Google Scholar
  41. Vrieling EG, Beelen TPM, Van Santen RA, Gieskes WWC (1999) Diatom silicon biomineralization as an inspirational source of new approaches to silica production. J Biotechnol 70:39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pacific Advanced Civil Engineering, Inc.Fountain ValleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of California, RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations