Advertisement

Journal of Applied Phycology

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 95–104 | Cite as

Identification and quantification of suspended algae and bacteria populations using flow cytometry: applications for algae biofuel and biochemical growth systems

  • G. T. Peniuk
  • P. J. Schnurr
  • D. G. AllenEmail author
Article

Abstract

Species diversity in algae biofuel and biochemical culturing systems can affect yield; in many large-scale algae growth systems, it is not practical to maintain a monoculture. To better understand and monitor these complex systems, techniques are required which can quickly and effectively quantify the species distribution and overall growth of a mixed microbial community in suspension. A flow cytometric method has been developed which can be used to differentiate populations of three Chlorophyta species, one diatom species, cyanobacteria, and heterotrophic bacteria according to their fluorescence and morphology. The nucleic acid stain SYTO9 was used to discriminate species with similar natural autofluorescence and to identify heterotrophic bacteria. Absolute cell enumeration was performed with counting beads and validated with a hemocytometer. Species identification was validated by analyzing known mixtures of axenic cell cultures. The utility of the method was demonstrated by studying the effect of light intensity on species succession, growth, and biomass accumulation in small algae growth systems over 22 days. Flow cytometric analysis, augmented with SYTO9 stain and counting beads, can be utilized to monitor algae biofuel and biochemical growth systems involving multiple species. This method allows for monitoring of contamination, succession, and overall growth in both natural and intentionally created microbial communities.

Keywords

Phytoplankton Flow cytometry Biofuels Bacteria Quantification SYTO9 dye 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for financial support in the form of a strategic grant, and a Canadian Graduate Scholarship (CGS D). Additional thanks to the Division of Engineering Science at the University of Toronto for supplementary financial support. Lastly, special acknowledgement to Dionne White at the University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine Flow Cytometry Facility for her guidance with the flow cytometer.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bertozzini E, Galluzzi L, Penna A, Magnani M (2011) Application of the standard addition method for the absolute quantification of neutral lipids in microalgae using Nile red. J Microbiol Methods 87:17–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Benemann J (2013) Microalgae for biofuels and animal feeds. Energies 6:5869–5886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beutler M, Wiltshire KH, Meyer B, Moldaenke C, Lüring C, Meyerhöfer M, Hansen UP, Dau H (2002) A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ. Photosynth Res 72:39–53CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cellamare M, Rolland A, Jacquet S (2010) Flow cytometry sorting of freshwater phytoplankton. J Appl Phycol 22:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen W, Zhang C, Song L, Sommerfeld M, Hu Q (2009) A high throughput Nile Red method for quantitative measurement of neutral lipids in microalgae. J Microbiol Methods 77:41–47CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chisti Y (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol Adv 25:294–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Crosbie ND, Teubner K, Weisse T (2003) Flow-cytometric mapping provided novel insights into the seasonal and vertical distributions of freshwater autotrophic picoplankton. Aquat Microb Ecol 33:53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dennis MA, Landman M, Wood SA, Hamilton D (2011) Application of flow cytometry for examining phytoplankton succession in two eutrophic lakes. Water Sci Technol 64:999–1008CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ebenezer V, Medlin LK, Ki J-S (2012) Molecular detection, quantification, and diversity evaluation of microalgae. Mar Biotechnol 14:129–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregor J, Maršálek B (2005) A simple in vivo fluorescence method for the selective detection and quantification of freshwater cyanobacteria and eukaryotic algae. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 33:142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffiths MJ, Garcin C, van Hille RP, Harrison STL (2011) Interference by pigment in the estimation of microalgal biomass concentration by optical density. J Microbiol Methods 85:119–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilton J, Rigg E, Jaworski G (1989) Algal identification using in vivo fluorescence spectra. J Plankton Res 11:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Imade GE, Towobola OA, Sagay AS, Otubu JAM (1993) Discrepancies in sperm count using Improved Neubauer, Makler, and Horwells counting chambers. Arch Androl 31:17–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Irving TE, Allen DG (2011) Species and material considerations in the formation and development of microalgal biofilms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 92:283–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Li WKW, Dickie PM (2001) Monitoring phytoplankton, bacterioplankton, and virioplankton in a coastal inlet (Bedford Basin) by flow cytometry. Cytometry 246:1–21Google Scholar
  17. Lustigman B, Lee LH, Weiss-Magasic C (1995) Effects of cobalt and pH on the growth of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 55:65–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Marie D, Partensky F, Jacquet S, Vaulot D (1997) Enumeration and cell cycle analysis of natural populations of marine picoplankton by flow cytometry using the nucleic acid stain SYBR Green I. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:186–93PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Marie D, Simon N, Vaulot D (2005) Phytoplankton cell counting by flow cytometry. In: Andersen RA (ed) Algal Culture Techniques. Academic Press, London, pp 253–267Google Scholar
  20. Mata TM, Martins AA, Caetano NS (2010) Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:217–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neidhardt F (1996) Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2nd edn. ASM Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Petersen TW, Harrison CB, Horner DN, van den Engh G (2012) Flow cytometric characterization of marine microbes. Methods 57:350–358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rutten TPA, Sandee B, Hofman ART (2005) Phytoplankton monitoring by high performance flow cytometry: a successful approach? Cytom Part A 26:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schnurr PJ, Espie GS, Allen DG (2013) Algae biofilm growth and the potential to stimulate lipid accumulation through nutrient starvation. Bioresour Technol 136:337–344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Stockenreiter M, Graber A-K, Haupt F, Stibor H (2011) The effect of species diversity on lipid production by micro-algal communities. J Appl Phycol 24:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sukenik A, Shelef G (1984) Algal autoflocculation—verification and proposed mechanism. Biotechnol Bioeng 26:4–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun J, Liu D (2003) Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. J Plankton Res 25:1331–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vandamme D, Foubert I, Fraeye I, Meesschaert B, Muylaert K (2012) Flocculation of Chlorella vulgaris induced by high pH: role of magnesium and calcium and practical implications. Bioresour Technol 105:114–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Vuorio K, Lepistö L, Holopainen A-L (2007) Intercalibrations of freshwater phytoplankton analyses. Boreal Environ Res 12:561–569Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied ChemistryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations